Rigorous evaluation of learning-based robotic systems is an essential prerequisite for deployment. However, real-world test data is expensive to gather; moreover, in a typical iterative development context, data gathered from the latest policy is necessarily limited in scale. This motivates evaluation methodologies that make use of heterogeneous data sources, including simulation, historical policy logs, and data collected from related platforms or environments. While such auxiliary data are abundant and inexpensive, they are generally not directly representative of real-world outcomes -- for example, performance in simulation may differ substantially from performance in the real world -- making their principled use for high-confidence performance estimation challenging. In this paper, we introduce X4Val, a general framework for variance-reduced real-world metric estimation in the presence of non-paired, multi-domain data. X4Val embeds samples from real and auxiliary domains into a shared representation space and learns a transferable predictor of real-world metrics; this learned predictor is then incorporated into a control-variates estimator, enabling variance reduction even when paired samples are unavailable. We provide theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations on autonomous driving and real-world robot manipulation tasks, domains across which X4Val achieves up to 38.4% variance reduction and demonstrates consistent improvements over strong baselines. These results show that non-paired, heterogeneous data can be leveraged to substantially improve the sample efficiency of rigorous robotic system validation.
Generalist robot manipulation policies trained on large, diverse datasets have shown remarkable promise across a wide range of tasks. However, rigorously evaluating these policies remains a fundamental challenge. Real-world performance depends on a large combinatorial space of task factors including object poses and camera viewpoints, making full, exhaustive evaluation intractable. Additionally, real hardware evaluation is slow and resource-intensive, so current practice is to use narrow test suites that can miss critical failure modes and misrepresent true deployment readiness. We propose an active evaluation framework that addresses this challenge by treating policy evaluation as a sequential experimental design problem. Our approach fits a probabilistic surrogate model over a structured space of task factors and adaptively selects evaluation configurations to maximize information gain over the policy's performance distribution, allowing for sample-efficient characterization of policy behavior across unseen conditions and a systematic identification of failure-prone regions. We conduct 2331 real-world evaluations across 3 tasks with 3 factor variations and find that our approach typically saves the evaluator at least 20-40% of trials compared to typical random testing.
This paper studies the problem of robot performance evaluation, focusing on how to obtain accurate and efficient estimates of real-world behavior under severe constraints on physical experimentation. Such estimates are essential for benchmarking algorithms, comparing design alternatives, validating controllers, and supporting certification or regulatory decision-making, yet real-world testing with physical robots is often expensive, time-consuming, and safety-limited. To mitigate the scarcity of real-world trials, sim-to-real methodologies are commonly employed, using low-cost simulators to inform, supplement, or prioritize physical experiments. Departing from (and complementary to) existing approaches in variance reduction (e.g., importance-sampling variants) or bias-correction (e.g., through prediction-powered inference or learned control variates), we examine this performance-evaluation problem through the lens of betting. We establish theoretical conditions under which a betting mechanism can yield accurate and efficient estimates (provably outperforming the Monte Carlo estimator) and we characterize how such bets should be constructed. We further develop theoretically grounded yet practically implementable approximations of the ideal bet, and we provide concrete decision rules that diagnose when these approximate betting strategies are working as intended. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods using both synthetic examples and cross-fidelity computational simulators. Notably, we also showcase an illustrative case in which a group of synthetic distributions are used to infer the real-world pick-and-place accuracy of a robotic manipulator, a seemingly unconventional sim-to-real transfer that becomes natural and feasible under the proposed betting perspective. Programs for reproducing empirical results are available at https://github.com/ISUSAIL/Bet4Sim2Real.
We present EVA-Client, an open-source framework for deployment, data collection, and evaluation of trained manipulation policies on real robots. Sitting between a policy server and the physical hardware, EVA-Client unifies the real-robot stages of the policy iteration loop within a single codebase. It makes three contributions. First, a component-decoupled architecture in which robot backends, inference strategies, and transport middlewares form an orthogonal grid: adding a robot or a strategy touches only its own layer. Second, inspectable execution through Debug, Collect, and Eval workflows, with modes ranging from open-loop simulation to continuous real-time control. Third, every evaluation run doubles as a data collection, recording full rollouts in training-ready format alongside exhaustive logs and a side-by-side comparison viewer, so each evaluation feeds the next round of training rather than ending as an unrecorded impression. EVA-Client further consolidates major real-time inference strategies, synchronous and asynchronous execution, ACT-style temporal ensembling, Real-Time Chunking, and a naive-async ablation baseline, behind a single configuration surface.