Architecture Shapes Transfer Specificity in Implicit Neural Representations

D Yang Eng

cs.LGJun 5, 2026

Architecture Shapes Transfer Specificity in Implicit Neural Representations

Authors: D Yang Eng

Abstract

Transfer in coordinate networks is often measured by warm-start gain, but whether that gain reflects source-specific structure or generic weight reuse is less clear. We study this question across three implicit neural representation (INR) families, SIREN, ReLU MLPs, and Fourier-feature MLPs, using controlled analytic tests, a 2D lid-driven-cavity Navier--Stokes benchmark, and 1D PDE reference-solution suites for heat, viscous Burgers, and focusing cubic NLS. The analytic tests use independent-seed random controls, while the PDE benchmarks use alternate same-family source controls and auxiliary ablations. Across settings, transfer magnitude and transfer specificity separate clearly. In a 10-seed controlled 1D geometric test, Fourier Features show the largest structured transfer ( $33.1\times$ ), followed by SIREN ( $23.0\times$ ) and ReLU ( $10.7\times$ ), but ReLU is far more selective: random-control transfer is $0.41\times$ for ReLU versus $14.24\times$ for SIREN. On a controlled two-parameter 1D family, the ranking changes: ReLU gives the clearest structured-versus-control separation at default settings, whereas Fourier Features improve only after bandwidth retuning. In Navier--Stokes and the broader 1D PDE suite, no single architecture dominates every equation, yet the same pattern remains: SIREN often reuses weights broadly, whereas ReLU and, in some equations, Fourier Features are more source-selective. Static diagnostics remain weak, and the heuristic scaling law $A_{\text{transfer}} \propto 1/Δt^2$ is rejected in the implemented 1D audit. These results position transfer specificity as a useful diagnostic for coordinate networks and suggest that architecture selection in scientific machine learning should be evaluated under explicit control conditions, not by transfer magnitude alone.

Explore similar work

May 8, 2026cs.LG

What Cohort INRs Encode and Where to Freeze Them

Reusing the early layers of cohort-trained INRs as initialization for new signals has been shown to accelerate and improve signal fitting, yet it remains unclear which layers of the shared encoder learn transferable representations and what those representations encode. We address both questions for two standard backbones, SIREN and Fourier-feature MLPs (FFMLP). First, sweeping the freeze depth across the shared encoder at test time, we find that the optimum coincides with the layer of highest weight stable rank. Moreover, freezing at this depth matches or improves on the standard fine-tuning recipe across all our experiments. Second, identifying which layer transfers does not characterize what that layer encodes. To address this we adopt sparse autoencoders (SAEs), the dominant tool in mechanistic interpretability, and present the first SAE decomposition of INR activations into sparse dictionary atoms. Interestingly, SIREN and FFMLP achieve comparable cohort-fitting quality, but learn qualitatively different dictionaries. Cohort SIREN's atoms are localized, tiling the coordinate plane such that each atom fires in a confined region independent of cohort content. Cohort FFMLP's atoms are image-spanning, tracing the contours of memorized cohort signals. Single-atom ablations confirm causal use of these dictionaries: a single FFMLP atom out of 4096 can drop PSNR by up to 10.6 dB across the image, while SIREN ablations remain confined to where the atom fires. Together, these results give the first mechanistic account of what transfers in cohort-trained INRs and turn their activations into inspectable dictionary atoms. These tools open a path towards characterizing what INRs encode and towards architectures designed for generalization rather than memorization.

Vasiliki Sideri-Lampretsa, Sophie Starck, Robbie Holland +2

Implicit Neural Representations Encode Fourier

Ask PDF

May 28, 2026cs.LG

Striding Across Reynolds Numbers: Representation Geometry in Neural PDE Generalisation

Cross-Reynolds generalisation in neural PDE solvers remains poorly characterised. On the canonical forced 2D Navier-Stokes benchmark, a trained Fourier Neural Operator reaches 46.68% relative L2 error under a 10x Reynolds-number shift, yet zero-forward-model retrieval baselines already improve to 41-42%. This suggests representation geometry as a major organising variable among the tested methods. We test this hypothesis through ConvAE-Relay, which matches states in a source-trained convolutional autoencoder latent space and borrows dynamics from a source-regime database, achieving 38.34+/-0.07% using only a source-regime database and no target-regime fitting, labels, or database entries. A 2x2 ablation isolates matching quality as dominant over the update rule. Oracle experiments confirm that source-regime dynamics directions remain transferable (cosine similarity ~0.84) when matching stays on-manifold; autoregressive drift is the primary bottleneck (~12 percentage points). From the learned-prediction side, a U-Net with multi-scale skip connections achieves 34.72+/-0.60%, consistent with the retrieval-side finding that local, multi-scale representations organise cross-Reynolds transfer among tested methods. All claims are scoped to this benchmark.

Jianing Shi

Shallow Water Equations Neural Partial Differential Equation Solvers Masked Autoencoders Representation Space

Ask PDF

May 8, 2026cs.CV

Is Class Signal Clustered or Routed in Task-Induced Implicit Neural Representation Weight Spaces?

Implicit neural representations (INRs) encode images as neural-network weights, making image classification a problem of weight-space classifiability. A natural geometric hypothesis is that classifier feedback should make image-specific weights cluster by class in the shared-anchor coordinate. We test this hypothesis in the SIREN-based Meta Weight Transformer (MWT) regime, where end-to-end training meta-learns a shared initialization and inner-loop update schedule for fitting image-specific SIRENs. We find that this prediction fails. Exposed weight-space geometry and supervised clustering pressure do not reliably track trained-reader accuracy; clustering can even make local neighborhoods more class-consistent while making the trained reader worse. Crucially, the reader constructs rather than inherits class-aligned geometry: token-flow diagnostics show that class-aligned neighborhoods become strongly predictive of trained-reader accuracy only after late reader interactions, not in the input coordinate. We further identify the native SIREN bias column in the augmented weight token as a low-dimensional, sample-dependent causal readout route for the trained reader; targeted controls rule out generic scalar-column and marginal-distribution artifacts. The diagnosis motivates interventions that strengthen reader routing, add an explicit bias route, or use denser inner-loop fitting; under the lane-specific training conventions used here, route-directed variants often outperform the shared-anchor baseline but interact non-additively. Task-induced INR weights are classifiable not because they form raw geometric clusters, but because their class signal is routed through the reader.

Xinyi Guo, Mingyi He, Haobin Ding +7

Implicit Neural Representations Model Weights Ground-Truth Signal

Ask PDF