Trustworthy Visual Predicates for Robust Manipulation Understanding under Degradation

Fatemeh Ziaeetabar

cs.CVJun 6, 2026

Trustworthy Visual Predicates for Robust Manipulation Understanding under Degradation

Authors: Fatemeh Ziaeetabar

Organizations: Department of Computer Science, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Manipulation understanding requires reliable relational evidence, such as contact, support, containment, motion coupling, grasp, release, and active-hand involvement. Although these visual predicates are widely used in event-chain, graph-based, and neuro-symbolic models, their reliability under visual degradation is rarely analyzed directly. This paper introduces a predicate-level reliability framework for robust manipulation understanding under blur, occlusion, illumination change, low resolution, frame dropping, and detection noise. The framework defines a structured predicate vocabulary, confidence-aware predicate estimation, and reliability metrics for predicate preservation, degradation sensitivity, temporal consistency, confidence-weighted stability, and downstream impact. Experiments on controlled manipulation videos and public egocentric or bimanual datasets, including VISOR/EPIC-KITCHENS, H2O, and ARCTIC, show that predicate failures are structured rather than uniform. Static spatial predicates remain comparatively robust, whereas contact-sensitive, dynamic, and derived predicates such as grasp and release are more fragile. Under severe degradation, detection noise, occlusion, and frame dropping cause the strongest reliability losses. Downstream analysis shows that degraded predicates reduce manipulation-understanding accuracy from 0.89 to 0.58, while removing confidence weighting under moderate degradation reduces accuracy from 0.74 to 0.64. These results show that predicate reliability provides a diagnostic layer between visual perception and structured manipulation reasoning.

Explore similar work

Sep 21, 2026cs.RO

LIBERO-VPro: Benchmarking Closed-Loop Visual Robustness of Robotic Foundation Models

Robotic foundation models achieve impressive performance on standard manipulation benchmarks, yet these evaluations typically assume clean, timely, and consistent visual observations throughout execution. We introduce LIBERO-VPro, a benchmark for systematically evaluating the closed-loop visual robustness of robotic foundation models by perturbing the visual evidence available during execution. LIBERO-VPro covers four complementary dimensions, including Visual Evidence Degradation, Camera Staleness, Visual Source Consistency, and Task-Relevant Scene Variation, spanning 12 challenge categories, 96 experimental settings, and 3,296 task-condition cases. We evaluate three vision-language-action models and three world-action models over approximately 196,000 simulated episodes, complemented by 200 real-world rollouts on a Franka Research 3. Our results reveal that strong nominal performance can mask substantial weaknesses in visual grounding and adaptation. Models often remain successful despite severe object-level occlusion, yet degrade sharply when local interaction cues are disrupted or familiar spatial priors are violated. They are also highly sensitive to stale or missing observations and struggle when changed task preconditions require behavioral adaptation. Finally, VLAs and WAMs exhibit distinct robustness profiles, showing that visual robustness is multi-dimensional and architecture-dependent. LIBERO-VPro provides a systematic diagnostic framework for developing robotic foundation models that can more reliably ground and adapt their actions under challenging visual conditions.

Huiqiong Li, Zhiting Mei, Anirudha Majumdar +3

Topic pending

Ask PDF

Sep 3, 2026cs.RO

FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate robot manipulation outcomes, but existing benchmarks offer limited evidence of cross-domain generalization. We introduce FailBench, a benchmark for robot failure detection comprising 2,197 manipulation attempts across 14 public sources (12 real-world, 2 simulated). In FailBench, 75% of failures occur naturally, and six real-world sources come from non-failure-detection datasets. Evaluating 13 VLM-based detectors, we find the best model achieves only 0.77 mean balanced accuracy. Notably, models fine-tuned for failure detection consistently underperform general-purpose VLMs and their own pretrained baselines. Performance depends heavily on required visual evidence: models approach saturation when outcomes depend on observable object motion, but degrade to near-chance (<0.60 balanced accuracy) on contact-intensive assembly tasks. Error analysis reveals a systematic bias toward predicting success under ambiguous evidence, which persists even with increased reasoning effort. Finally, we show that input-level intervention--spatially localizing and cropping outcome-relevant regions--improves the top detector by 2.4 percentage points without extra training.

Zaruhi Navasardyan, Tatul Danielyan, Hrant Davtyan

Executable Robot Behavior Robot Systems Visual Evidence

Ask PDF

Jun 30, 2026cs.RO

Robustness of Robotic Manipulation: Foundations and Frontiers

Humans and animals exhibit remarkable robustness in physical manipulation, yet robots remain far behind. Progress toward human-level manipulation robustness is hindered by the absence of a unified and systematic understanding: different subfields frame robustness in distinct ways, often leaving the concept ambiguous and limiting deeper analysis as well as communication across research areas. This paper presents a systematic study of manipulation robustness. We begin with a formal definition, characterizing robustness as the degree to which a manipulation system can achieve its goal in the presence of uncertainty and variation. Building on this definition, we introduce general formulations of manipulation robustness from probabilistic and control-theoretic perspectives. We then synthesize the guiding principles and concrete mechanisms of manipulation robustness across perception, planning, control, policy learning, and hardware, illustrating each mechanism through representative works, including foundational and recent studies. In addition, we revisit existing metrics and evaluation methods for quantifying manipulation robustness. Finally, we distill broader lessons for designing robust manipulation systems and discuss open problems and future directions toward achieving human-level robustness in robotic manipulation.

Yifei Dong, Zhanyi Sun, Lujie Yang +5

Robust Manipulation Manipulation Frontiers

Ask PDF