PairWise Image Finder: An Open-source Tool for Finding Visually Aligned Street-Level Image Pairs for Urban Perception Studies
Organizations: Digital Geography Lab, Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, PO Box 64 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2), 00014, Helsinki, Finland
Abstract
Change detection and scene recognition techniques have been widely applied to Street View Imagery (SVI) to understand changes in scenes across the years. However, metadata alone is often insufficient to reliably find visually aligned image pairs. This study introduces the PairWise image finder, a tool that integrates feature detection and matching, supported by semantic segmentation masks to quantify the visual alignment of two images of varying time periods. The tool outputs the share of matched key features, the matched feature distance and coverage, and the alignment of semantic masks, which enables the user to filter image pairs depending on the alignment quality and use case. The visually aligned pairs derived from the tool can be used to accurately study explicit longitudinal change and help reduce manual effort for perception studies. The usability of the tool is demonstrated through a comparison of longitudinal changes, highlighting the importance of perspective when quantifying changes. The proposed method provides a scalable and open tool for researchers and stakeholders to find high-quality image pairs for urban analysis, perception and related applications.
Explore similar work
Finding Change in Satellite Archives from Text: How to Combine Before-and-After Images Efficiently
find the image pairs where a new building appeared.'' This means searching an archive of before-and-after (bi-temporal) satellite image pairs and ranking each pair by how well it matches a natural-language description of the change. The component that performs this match, the fusion module that combines the before'' and ``after'' views, must be run at query time across many candidate pairs, so its speed largely sets the cost of every search. We present a controlled comparison of how to build that module. Using one fixed image encoder (a frozen CLIP model) and one training recipe for all variants, we evaluate eight designs drawn from three families: attention, state-space models (Mamba), and learned compression (our Temporal Bottleneck Fusion, TBF). Each design is tested on two benchmarks (LEVIR-CC and Dubai-CC) with ten random seeds, so the reported differences are statistically grounded. We outline three findings: first, a training-free two-stage search (a cheap difference model that shortlists candidates, followed by attention fusion that re-ranks them) matches or exceeds full-fusion recall on LEVIR-CC while cutting query cost -, with comparable R@1/R@5 on Dubai-CC; second, the linear-time scan of Mamba, attractive on paper, gives no speed benefit at the patch counts typical of vision transformers (): the scan is limited by memory bandwidth, whereas attention maps cleanly onto parallel hardware; and third, compressing the fused representation (TBF) reduces parameters by and latency by for a change-only BLEU-1 cost of , although more aggressive compression quietly discards change-relevant detail that aggregate metrics fail to reveal.