Advancing Wood Identification in the Philippines: Utilizing the Xylorix Platform for Efficient AI Model Development and Deployment for Five Key Species

Interest in forestry automation is growing alongside rapid advances in deep learning. In particular, tree detection and taxonomic classification are seen as core tasks required for automating field surveys and forestry equipment. These operations must often be performed in under-canopy settings, which pose challenging conditions for perception systems, including heavy occlusion, variable lighting, and dense vegetation. Despite this necessity, current work has yet to properly establish the feasibility of simultaneously executing tree detection and taxonomic classification in natural forests, as available datasets primarily focus on urban settings or on a limited number of species. To address this gap, we present SilvaScenes, a benchmark dataset for instance segmentation of tree species from under-canopy images in natural forests. Collected across five bioclimatic domains in Quebec, Canada, our dataset features 1421 trees from 28 species, with segmentation masks for pixel-precise tree trunk detection and fine-grained species annotations from forestry experts. We demonstrate the relevance and difficult nature of SilvaScenes by evaluating modern deep learning approaches, showing that while trunk segmentation is feasible, with a top mean average precision (mAP) of 69.9% and mean average recall (mAR) of 76.4%, species-aware segmentation remains a significant challenge with an mAP and an mAR of only 39.2% and 68.6%, respectively. Alongside additional experiments, we highlight key challenges, namely that species imbalance and tree occlusion figure among the most pressing issues for precise segmentation and identification. Meanwhile, higher image resolutions contribute to significant performance gains and will likely prove fundamental to these tasks moving forward. Our dataset, source code, and models will be made available at https://github.com/norlab-ulaval/SilvaScenes.

Accurate classification of tropical tree species from unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery remains challenging due to high species diversity and strong visual similarity among species at typical image resolutions (centimeters per pixel). In contrast, models trained on close-up citizen science photographs captured with smartphones achieve strong plant species classification performance. Recent advances in UAV data acquisition now enable the collection of close-up images that are spatially registered with top-view aerial imagery and approach the level of visual detail found in smartphone photographs, with the trade-off that such high-resolution photos cannot be acquired for many trees. In this work, we evaluate the performance of existing methods using paired top-view and close-up UAV imagery collected in a species-rich tropical forest. Through fine-tuning experiments, we quantify the performance gap between vision foundation models and in-domain generalist plant recognition models across both image types (high-resolution close-up versus coarser-resolution top-view imagery). We show that classification performance is consistently higher on close-up images than on top-view aerial imagery, and that this performance gap widens for rare species. Finally, we propose that self-supervised representation alignment across these two spatial scales offers a promising approach for integrating fine-grained visual information into canopy-level species classification models based on top-view UAV imagery. Leveraging high-resolution close-up UAV imagery to enhance canopy-level species classification could substantially improve large-scale monitoring of tropical forest biodiversity.

Camera traps often run in the field on edge hardware with limited or no connectivity, making small, locally-deployable vision-language models (VLMs) -- not frontier-scale ones -- the practically relevant class to evaluate for species identification. We test whether models in this deployment-relevant 2--8B range carry genuine taxonomic knowledge, evaluating four such VLMs (Qwen3-VL 2B/4B/8B, Gemma3 4B) against the domain-specific specialist BioCLIP (300M parameters) on a 96-species task, comparing clean iNaturalist photographs against camera-trap imagery from 6 LILA.science collections, on two independently-sampled evaluation sets. All models identify species far above chance, but every model -- general-purpose or specialist -- degrades sharply on field imagery (domain gaps of 9.6--26.6 percentage points, consistent across taxonomic levels and both evaluation sets), indicating the degradation reflects general image legibility rather than fine-grained discrimination failure. BioCLIP substantially outperforms every VLM tested (by 33.2--59.2 percentage points across an expanded 200-image sample for every model) despite its far smaller size, suggesting the gap reflects specialized training data rather than model scale; yet BioCLIP's own domain gap (18.0 points) is statistically indistinguishable from the best VLM's (22.3 points), suggesting the clean-to-field degradation itself is a property of the image-quality shift rather than a general-purpose-model weakness. Under open-set prompting, 5.9--9.6% of responses are syntactically valid but taxonomically nonexistent species names; the relative fabrication-rate ranking across models replicates exactly across both evaluation sets, a more robust finding than any single point estimate.