Quo Vadis, Visual In-Context Learning? A Unified Benchmark Across Domains and Tasks

Visual in-Context Learning (VICL) aims at making progress towards adaptive vision models, that can -- based on a few examples -- adapt to a new task at test-time. With the history of in-context learning in natural language processing research, where large, parameter-heavy models are in use, one pathway that current VICL methods take is model- and data-scaling as key ingredients. Yet, it is not clear, whether these ingredients are the key for in-context learning to take shape in vision models. To stress-test such large models, we challenge them with an extreme counterexample: we train a tiny visual in-context model with merely $1$ million parameters and a modest amount of $70,000$ images. We compare the results of this severely capacity capped tiny model to $7,000\times$ larger VICL models in different adaptive settings, (1) on image data with small distribution shifts, (2) on unseen task encodings and (3) on a completely new task, i.e., the setting VICL envisions. With the chasm of training resources between the tiny- and large models, our experiments showcase a lack in how adaptive capabilities are measured, with respect to how tasks are encoded, which tasks were used in pre-training and the choice of metrics. These gaps in current VICL benchmarking underscore a need for innovation in evaluation of adaptive capabilities.

Vision-language models (VLMs) can follow complex textual instructions, yet they struggle to reason from purely visual context. In particular, current models fail to infer shared concepts from sets of example images and apply them to new inputs. We introduce Visual Concept Inference from Sets (VICIS), a task that evaluates this capability. Given a small context set of images sharing a concept and a query image, the model must generate new images that preserve the context-defined concept while remaining consistent with the query. We show that state-of-the-art VLMs perform poorly on this task, often ignoring the visual context or defaulting to biased generations. To address this gap, we propose a training framework and architecture that learn to infer visual concepts from image sets and extract concept-specific embeddings from queries. Experiments on synthetic data and large-scale ImageNet/WordNet data show that our model generates more accurate and diverse outputs and generalizes to unseen concepts and modalities such as sketches.

Visual in-context learning (VICL) solves visual tasks by conditioning on a few input-output demonstrations without any model training. Recent advances in large vision-language models (VLMs) have shown promising VICL capability when the demonstration pair and the query belong to the same vision task, but real use cases often provide mismatched examples, making it unclear whether a VLM should imitate the demonstrated transformation or infer a new one from the query. This raises a fundamental question: Can VLMs perform cross-task VICL where demonstration and query differ? In the paper, we study this cross-task VICL setting and propose T2T-VICL, a collaborative prompt-transfer framework, which converts mismatched visual demonstrations into implicit textual guidance without explicitly naming the tasks. To do so, a large teacher VLM first generates structured descriptions of visual changes and task differences between task pairs, from which we construct a dataset of diverse implicit cross-task relations. We then distill this capability into a lightweight student VLM that produces content-dependent prompts from a task-A demonstration pair and a task-B query. The generated prompt is used to guide a frozen image-editing VLM, and a score-based inference strategy is introduced to rank multiple candidates. Experiments on 12 low-level vision tasks and over 20 evaluated cross-task pairs show that T2T-VICL consistently improves task-aware alignment over fixed prompting and often also improves image fidelity, revealing both the potential and limits of cross-task VICL. Our code is available on GitHub.