Human-Enhanced Loop Modeling (HELM): Agent-Based Finite Element Modeling of Concrete Bridge Barriers

The design of reinforced concrete (RC) highway barriers is a safety-critical engineering task that requires strict compliance with regulatory provisions such as the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. Current engineering practice relies largely on manual, iterative, and experience-driven procedures to satisfy complex material, geometric, and mechanical constraints. Although standalone large language models (LLMs) show strong capabilities in knowledge representation and text generation, their direct use in structural engineering design is limited by hallucination, numerical reasoning errors, and insufficient integration with physics-based analysis. To address these limitations, this study proposes a "generation-validation-modification" closed-loop framework for automated RC barrier design based on the multi-agent orchestration capability of AutoGen. The framework integrates specialized agents for parameter generation, mechanics-based calculation, target-interval evaluation, deviation diagnosis, and rule-based design modification. The multi-agent framework (MAF) was evaluated on three barrier testing levels (TL-3, TL-4, and TL-5) using sixty RC barrier designs with different geometric configurations. Three DeepSeek models with different parameter scales, DS-8B, DS-32B, and DS-671B, were investigated. All designs were evaluated according to Section 13 of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 10th Edition (2024). Results show that MAF-DS-8B achieves a target-interval compliance rate of 98.3%, while the best-performing standalone LLM, DS-32B, achieves 11.7%. These results demonstrate that multi-agent architectures can improve the reliability, interpretability, and accessibility of AI-assisted engineering design for practical applications.

Finite element analysis (FEA) is the most important numerical approach for solid mechanics. Challenges of FEA include a steep learning curve for entry-level users and potential false simulations due to incorrect definitions of key simulation components, such as boundary conditions, load cases, and solution variables. Years of engineering experience are usually necessary for real-world problem-solving. To address these issues, we present AbaqusAgent, a multi-agent framework grounded in large language models (LLMs) for solid mechanics analyses. AbaqusAgent is developed to facilitate analysis case generation and execution using Abaqus, one of the most widely used FEA packages, by turning users' natural-language instructions into executed FEA analyses and result visualization. AbaqusAgent is composed of six agents, including interpreter, architect, input writer, runner, reviewer, and visualizer agents, encompassing all the essential pre-processing and post-processing steps of standard FEA analyses. A wide variety of 50 solid mechanics problems have been successfully validated, achieving an overall success rate of 86%. Beyond improving the efficiency of FEA for solid mechanics problems and lowering the barrier to computational mechanics education, AbaqusAgent advances the human-simulation interaction paradigm and enables integration with AI-empowered optimization and material characterization workflows. The code is available at https://github.com/LIRAM-LIN/AbaqusAgent

Large language models deployed for MAPDL finite-element simulation face practical reliability challenges: without structured execution control, tool encapsulation, and fault recovery, outputs may be inconsistent and task failures are common. The Agent Harness paradigm addresses this by inserting domain-specific orchestration middleware that manages tool lifecycles, workflow state, and recovery escalation. This paper presents the architecture of CAX-Agent, a lightweight agent harness purpose-built for MAPDL automation, and empirically evaluates one of its core components -- the recovery policy.CAX-Agent organizes execution into three layers -- LLM service, agent harness, and solver backend -- with a recovery ladder that escalates from deterministic rule patching through model-driven regeneration to context enrichment and human intervention. We evaluate three recovery strategies (no_recovery, rule_only, and model_only) on 50 standard structural benchmarks with three repeated runs per strategy (450 case-runs total). Two independent human raters score task completion under blind conditions; inter-rater agreement is strong (quadratic weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.84, 96 percent of score pairs within one point). Model_only achieves the best completion rate (0.9267), task score (3.59/4), total score (9.16/10), and zero-intervention rate (0.84), outperforming rule_only (0.7733, 3.17/4, 7.03/10, 0.00) and no_recovery (0.6933, 2.74/4, 5.60/10, 0.00) with large effect sizes (Cliff's delta = 0.81-0.87). The benchmark uses deliberately simple geometries to isolate recovery-policy effects; we discuss the scope of these findings and directions for broader validation.