cs.ARJun 11, 2026

BigPower: Hierarchical Source-Level Module Power Estimation for CPUs with Large Language Models

Authors: Honghua ZhuChunjie LuoJianfeng Zhan

Abstract

Accurate power estimation is important for understanding and optimizing CPU power behavior, yet practical workflows often rely on simulation-derived information or post-silicon analysis. In this work, we present BigPower, a hierarchical source-level surrogate model for fine-grained module-level power estimation during CPU design. BigPower leverages large language model-based representations together with architectural hierarchy, module connectivity, configuration parameters, and workload context to estimate module-level power consumption directly from source-level design information, without requiring additional simulation during inference. Experimental results in the open-source XiangShan processor family demonstrate practical fine-grained power estimation across diverse configurations and workloads, offering an efficient alternative to conventional simulation-based workflows.

Explore similar work

May 26, 2026cs.DC

A Methodology to Assess Power Modeling in Energy-Aware Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Mobile Devices

Estimating CPU power on heterogeneous ARM-based commodity devices is challenging due to limited access to CPU's voltage domains. As a result, state-of-the-art energy-aware Federated Learning (FL) frameworks typically rely on simplified approximate power models to estimate computation energy, rather than the more accurate analytical CMOS-based model. To bridge this gap, we propose a reproducible CPU power estimation methodology combined with a rail-to-cluster mapping technique to retrieve cluster-level supply voltage. We evaluate our approach on two commodity Android devices and show that the analytical model predicts CPU power with errors below 10%, whereas the approximate model incurs errors of up to 959%. Using AnycostFL, a state-of-the-art energy-aware FL framework, we show that the analytical model achieves the same 80% model accuracy while consuming 1.4x less energy than the approximate model. These results highlight that approximate models can severely misestimate computation energy and lead to suboptimal decisions. This work facilitates the use of analytical CPU power models on heterogeneous multi-cluster ARM-based mobile SoCs without additional hardware support or external power measurement tools.
Chaimae Jallouli, Karim Boubouh, Robert Basmadjian
May 20, 2026cs.AI

PALS: Power-Aware LLM Serving for Mixture-of-Experts Models

Large language model (LLM) inference has become a dominant workload in modern data centers, driving significant GPU utilization and energy consumption. While prior systems optimize throughput and latency by batching, scheduling, and parallelism, they largely treat GPU power as a static constraint rather than a controllable resource. In this paper, we present a power-aware runtime for LLM serving, PALS, that treats GPU power caps as a first-class control knob and jointly optimizes them with software parameters such as batch size. The system combines lightweight offline power-performance models with a feedback-driven controller to select configurations that satisfy throughput targets while maximizing energy efficiency. We implement PALS within an existing LLM serving framework, vLLM, demonstrating that it requires no model retraining or API changes. Across multi-GPU systems and both dense and mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, PALS improves energy efficiency by up to 26.3%, reduces QoS violations by 4x to 7x under power constraints, and tracks dynamic power budgets. These results highlight the potential of integrating power control directly into LLM inference runtimes, enabling energy-proportional and grid-interactive AI systems.
Can Hankendi, Rana Shahout, Minlan Yu +1
Jul 2, 2026cs.DC

WattGPU: Predicting Inference Power and Latency on Unseen GPUs and LLMs

Large Language Model (LLM) inference workloads are a rapidly growing contributor to data center energy consumption. Optimizing these deployments requires matching specific LLMs to the most efficient GPUs, but operators currently lack the tools to do so without exhaustively profiling each combination. While some predictive models exist, they still require profiling data and struggle to generalize to hardware unseen during training. To address this, we introduce \textit{WattGPU}, featuring two predictive models for mean GPU power draw and Inter-Token Latency (ITL). Our approach leverages only publicly available LLM metadata and GPU specifications, eliminating the need for hardware access or profiling while enabling generalization to unseen NVIDIA server-grade GPUs and LLMs. We evaluate our models using rigorous leave-one-GPU-out and leave-one-LLM-out cross-validation on a dataset of 42 open-source LLMs (0.1B--27B parameters) and 8 GPUs under both offline and server scenarios. The mean power draw model achieves a median absolute percentage error of 3.4%\leq3.4\% for offline and 13.5%\leq13.5\% for server scenarios on unseen GPUs, while the latency model achieves 8.5%\leq8.5\% in server mode, both maintaining strong GPU ranking correlations for server scenarios (Kendall τ0.76τ\geq0.76). Compared to standard physically grounded baselines -- Load-Scaled Thermal Design Power (TDP) for power draw and roofline for latency -- our models reduce median absolute percentage error by approximately 4×\times on unseen LLM-GPU combinations for server scenarios or approximately 2×\times for completely unseen GPUs. WattGPU's data and code are publicly available at https://github.com/maufadel/wattgpu.
Mauricio Fadel Argerich, Jonathan Fürst, Marta Patiño-Martínez