Applicability Condition Extraction for Therapeutic Drug-Disease Relations

Automated Drug Combination Extraction (DCE) from large-scale biomedical literature is crucial for advancing precision medicine and pharmacological research. However, existing relation extraction methods primarily focus on binary interactions and struggle to model variable-length n-ary drug combinations, where complex compatibility logic and distributed evidence need to be considered. To address these limitations, we propose RexDrug, an end-to-end reasoning-enhanced relation extraction framework for n-ary drug combination extraction based on large language models. RexDrug adopts a two-stage training strategy. First, a multi-agent collaborative mechanism is utilized to automatically generate high-quality expert-like reasoning traces for supervised fine-tuning. Second, reinforcement learning with a multi-dimensional reward function specifically tailored for DCE is applied to further refine reasoning quality and extraction accuracy. Extensive experiments on the DrugComb dataset show that RexDrug consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines for n-ary extraction. Additional evaluation on the DDI13 corpus confirms its generalizability to binary drugdrug interaction tasks. Human expert assessment and automatic reasoning metrics further indicates that RexDrug produces coherent medical reasoning while accurately identifying complex therapeutic regimens. These results establish RexDrug as a scalable and reliable solution for complex biomedical relation extraction from unstructured text. The source code and data are available at https://github.com/DUTIR-BioNLP/RexDrug

Systematic characterization of drug-disease relationships is essential for drug discovery and repurposing, yet is hindered by the heterogeneity and rapid growth of biomedical literature. Existing datasets rely on labor-intensive curation and are often incomplete, while LLM-only approaches suffer from hallucination and weak evidence grounding. We introduce UniD$^3$, a unified framework that integrates Large Language Models with Knowledge Graph-enhanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) to extract, organize, and validate drug-disease knowledge across Drug-Disease Matching (DDM), Drug Effectiveness Assessment (DEA), and Drug-Target Analysis (DTA). UniD$^3$ processes 157,849 PubMed articles with Llama 3.3-70B and constructs knowledge graphs via a dual-stage strategy combining paper-level extraction with KG-level consolidation centered on drug and disease entities. These graphs support KG-RAG-based generation of structured datasets, evaluated through external benchmarks, fuzzy matching with curated resources, and clinician review. UniD$^3$ produces six knowledge graphs and large-scale datasets, including 28,915 DDM, 15,042 DEA, and over 4,000 DTA QA pairs. External validation shows strong performance (F1: 0.85-0.87 for DDM/DEA; 0.82 for DTA), with clinician review confirming high reliability (AUROC = 0.90). KG-RAG-augmented models outperform standalone LLMs, and the UniD$^3$ chatbot enables interpretable, citation-supported exploration of drug-disease relationships. UniD$^3$ provides a scalable, extensible framework for transforming unstructured biomedical literature into high-quality, structured drug-disease knowledge, supporting AI-driven discovery, repurposing, and precision medicine.

Drug repurposing is often framed as a candidate identification task, but existing approaches provide limited guidance for distinguishing biologically plausible candidates from historically well-connected ones. Here we introduce DrugKLM, a hybrid framework that integrates biomedical knowledge graph structure with large language model-based mechanistic reasoning to enable mechanistically grounded therapeutic prioritization. Across benchmark datasets, DrugKLM outperforms knowledge graph-only and language model-only baselines, including TxGNN. Beyond improved recall, DrugKLM confidence scores exhibit functional alignment with molecular phenotypes: higher scores are associated with transcriptional signatures linked to improved survival across 12 TCGA cancers. The scoring framework preferentially captures biologically perturbational signals rather than historical indication patterns. Expert curation across five cancers further reveals systematic differences in prioritization behavior, with DrugKLM elevating candidates supported by coherent mechanistic rationale and disease-specific clinical context. Together, these results establish DrugKLM as an evidence-integrative framework that translates heterogeneous biomedical data into mechanistically interpretable and clinically grounded therapeutic hypotheses.