Encoder Winners Do Not Reliably Transfer Across VLA Backbone Scale: A Frozen-Backbone Grafting Diagnostic

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models acquire broad embodied capabilities through large-scale pretraining, yet their generalization remains far more fragile than that of LLMs and VLMs. The prevailing remedy, post-training via supervised fine-tuning or reinforcement learning, improves task-specific performance but narrows the generalist capability that makes pretraining valuable. We identify a key bottleneck: VLA failures stem not only from action generation but also from action evaluation. A diagnostic pass@k study confirms that frozen VLAs already contain competent behaviors in their output distribution, with overall success rates rising from 33% at pass@1 to 92% at pass@32. Inspired by this, we propose SVA (Search, Value, and Act), a simple framework that equips frozen VLA policies with long-term consequence awareness. SVA first uses Monte-Carlo tree search in simulation to fully explore the VLA's output distribution and collect diverse trajectories annotated with empirical returns; this knowledge is then distilled into a lightweight Q-value model that predicts the expected consequence of candidate actions; at deployment, the frozen VLA proposes multiple candidates and the evaluator selects the one with the highest uncertainty-regularized Q-value, requiring no simulator access. By decoupling action proposal from consequence evaluation, SVA preserves the generalization capacity of the VLA backbone while substantially improving task success rates. Experiments across embodied benchmarks show that SVA consistently improves generalization on unseen tasks and exhibits strong test-time scaling behavior. Strikingly, SVA enables a 9B VLA to outperform a 27B VLA by 7 points at 27% lower inference latency, suggesting that scaling test-time evaluation is more cost-effective than scaling model size.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models enable instruction-driven robotic manipulation, but they inherit oversized language backbones from pretrained VLMs whose capacity far exceeds what is needed for short robotic instructions. This raises a basic question: how much of a VLA model is actually necessary for closed-loop control? In this work, we study architectural redundancy in VLA models by using transformer block removal as a controlled intervention. We introduce \textbf{Drop-Then-Recovery (DTR)}, an analysis protocol that removes selected blocks from a pretrained VLA model and then fine-tunes the resulting model to measure whether the removed capacity was necessary for downstream control. To make this intervention reliable, we propose \textbf{GateProbe}, a one-shot virtual-gate sensitivity metric that ranks blocks by their contribution to the downstream action loss. Across multiple VLA architectures, manipulation benchmarks and even real-robot industrial scenarios, we find a strong asymmetry in post-removal recoverability: \ul{\textit{language backbones are highly redundant for standard robotic manipulation tasks, whereas vision and action pathways are substantially less tolerant to removal}}. On LIBERO, removing half of the LLM blocks even improves OpenVLA-OFT from 95.0% to 98.3% under the same downstream fine-tuning budget, and retaining only two language blocks still recovers baseline-level performance. These results suggest that current VLA benchmarks may exert limited pressure on deep language grounding and compositional instruction understanding, and that future VLA architectures should allocate capacity more deliberately across language, vision, and action components. The code is available at https://github.com/s1ghhh/VLADrop.

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models transform representations from pretrained vision-language models (VLMs) into robot actions, yet the interface that routes intermediate VLM features into action decoders remains underexplored. Existing designs either expose only a narrow part of the representation hierarchy or rigidly match each decoder block to one VLM layer, restricting access to complementary task evidence across depths. We introduce LIRA, a local cross-layer action-conditioning mechanism that formulates VLM-to-action conditioning as depth-aware information routing. LIRA operates on task-token features and LIRA Query features derived from intermediate VLM states, then assigns each Parallel Fusion Block a depth-aligned local window centered on its corresponding VLM layer. Parallel Fusion Blocks aggregate neighboring LIRA Query features and integrate them with task-token features and proprioceptive inputs before action prediction. This routing interface leaves the backbone architecture, action decoder, and supervised training recipe unchanged. Across LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, CALVIN ABC$\rightarrow$D, and real-world manipulation, LIRA improves the principal aggregate metrics over the VLA-Adapter baseline under the same 0.5B-parameter configuration. In zero-shot transfer to LIBERO-Plus, LIRA increases average success from 59.1% to 78.0%, an 18.9-point gain indicating improved robustness under controlled distribution shifts.