cs.AIJun 12, 2026

AI Engram: In Search of Memory Traces in Artificial Intelligence

Authors: Jea KwonDong-Kyum KimJiwon KimYonghyun KimWoong KookMeeyoung Cha

Abstract

Memory formation is fundamental to intelligence, yet whether deep neural networks preserve identifiable memory traces analogous to biological memory units remains an open question. This work introduces a geometric framework to identify such "AI engrams" by formalizing the neuroscientific criteria of specificity, reactivation, sufficiency, and necessity into a constrained inverse problem. We derive a closed-form estimator that isolates individual memory traces from globally entangled parameters, and show that this biologically-derived solution corresponds to a natural gradient update on the parameter manifold. AI engrams enable surgical manipulation of learned knowledge: any subset of memories can be composed or erased through linear arithmetic, without iterative optimization. Experiments ranging from simple MLPs to LLMs demonstrate the causal validity and substantial scalability of AI engrams. Together, these results bridge theories of biological memory and artificial representation learning and offer geometric insight into how deep networks simultaneously support functional specificity within distributed storage.

Explore similar work

Jun 7, 2026cs.LG

Not Just After One: Sleep-Inspired Replay Prevents Catastrophic Forgetting After Sequential Tasks

One of the critical limitations of artificial neural networks is their lack of ability to continually learn: training on new tasks often leads to interference and forgetting of the previous ones. While several algorithms have been proposed to protect old memories from interference, they are typically applied during or immediately after each new episode of training. In contrast, humans and animals can learn continuously, acquiring multiple new memories during active learning before consolidating all of them into long-term storage. Here we show that multiple new tasks can be trained sequentially before an unsupervised sleep-like replay phase is applied to partially restore performance across all previously learned tasks. Our study further suggests that task-specific information remains resilient to new training but decays gradually as network is trained on new tasks. These findings point to novel principles for developing a broad range of continual learning AI solutions.
Anthony Bazhenov, Jean Erik Delanois, Giri P. Krishnan
Apr 26, 2026cs.AI

ZenBrain: A Neuroscience-Inspired 7-Layer Memory Architecture for Autonomous AI Systems

On LongMemEval-500, ZenBrain matches a long-context oracle's binary-judge accuracy to within 4.5 pp (47.7%47.7\% vs. 52.2%52.2\%; 91.3%91.3\%) at 1/106th1/106^\text{th} of the per-query token cost (App. F.5-F.6, Fig. 2), and wins all 12 head-to-head answer-quality cells (4 systems ×\times 3 LLM judges) against Letta, Mem0, and A-Mem under Bonferroni correction (α=0.05/18α=0.05/18, pmin=6.2×1031p_\text{min}=6.2\times 10^{-31}, d[0.18,0.52]d \in [0.18, 0.52]). ZenBrain is a 7-layer neuroscience-inspired memory architecture. The contribution is architectural integration: 15 validated neuroscience mechanisms unified under a single MemoryCoordinator -- 9 foundational algorithms (Two-Factor Synaptic KG, vmPFC-coupled FSRS, Simulation-Selection sleep, Bayesian confidence, and five more) plus 6 Predictive Memory Architecture components (NeuromodulatorEngine, ReconsolidationEngine, TripleCopyMemory, PriorityMap, StabilityProtector, MetacognitiveMonitor). No prior system integrates more than two. Stress ablation (60 days, Wilcoxon, 10 seeds) reveals a cooperative survival network: 9 of 15 mechanisms become individually critical (ΔQΔQ up to 93.7%-93.7\%), while moderate conditions mask individual contributions. Sim-Selection sleep adds 37% stability with 47.4% storage reduction (p5.1×103p \le 5.1\times 10^{-3}); TripleCopyMemory retains S(t)=0.912S(t)=0.912 at 30 days; multi-layer routing beats a flat baseline by +20.7%+20.7\% F1 on LoCoMo, +19.5%+19.5\% on MemoryArena. A cross-provider bias-direction check (ΔGPT-Anth=0.0001Δ_\text{GPT-Anth}=-0.0001 for ZB vs. 0.049-0.049 for Mem0) rules out LLM-judge-specific confounds. Open-source with 11,589 CI tests.
Alexander Bering
Apr 22, 2026cs.LG

SCM: Sleep-Consolidated Memory with Algorithmic Forgetting for Large Language Models

We present SCM (Sleep-Consolidated Memory), a research preview of a memory architecture for large language models that draws on neuroscientific principles to address a fundamental limitation in current systems: the absence of persistent, structured, and biologically plausible memory. Existing approaches rely on truncating context windows, growing vector databases without bound, or tiered storage systems that lack consolidation and forgetting mechanisms. SCM implements five core components inspired by human memory: a limited-capacity working memory, multi-dimensional importance tagging, offline sleep-stage consolidation with distinct NREM and REM phases, intentional value-based forgetting, and a computational self-model enabling introspection. Across a standardized benchmark suite of eight tests, the prototype achieves perfect recall accuracy over ten-turn conversations while reducing memory noise by 90.9% through adaptive forgetting. Memory search latency remains below one millisecond even with hundreds of stored concepts. This work establishes the architectural foundations for memory systems that consolidate, prioritize, and forget, offering a testable platform for advancing LLM memory research.
Saish Sachin Shinde