Active Learning with Low-Rank Structure for Data Selection

Benchmarks of machine learning models often include many datasets, making evaluation expensive. For efficiency, it is preferable to perform evaluations on small, representative datasets instead. The selection of such subsets typically relies on heuristics and is rarely analyzed for the robustness of the resulting model rankings. We introduce a framework to perform the task of selecting datasets subsets with an evaluation of how different selection strategies preserve the global model rankings. Our framework includes bootstrap aggregation, which provides valid confidence intervals, allowing a principled comparison of selection strategies. We consider clustering, design criteria (A/D-optimality), random baselines, and greedy farthest-first (FAFI). For the latter, we derive upper bounds on selection quality in terms of ranking errors as a function of the number of selected datasets. Empirically, in time series classification (TSC, 112 datasets) and in a supplementary natural language processing benchmark derived from MTEB (57 tasks), several selection strategies improve rank preservation compared with random subsets, including simple FAFI. In contrast, in recommender systems (30 datasets), the improvement of strategies over random selection is small and typically statistically insignificant. For TSC, our best-performing strategy achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.95 with the full benchmark model rankings using only five selected datasets. Additional experiments indicate that the effectiveness of selection approaches depends on both the quality of dataset representations and the scale of the benchmarking regime.

We study the problem of k-means clustering on large datasets. The state-of-the-art for the problem is given by coresets-based approaches, which build small weighted summaries of the input and derive approximate solutions with rigorous quality guarantees from them. One of the most popular and advanced approaches to derive coresets for k-means is sensitivity sampling. However, sensitivity sampling requires to compute the importance of each input point with respect to the whole dataset over all possible choices of centers. Since the exact computation of such quantities is unfeasible, current approaches work by approximating the sensitivity values. Nevertheless, the runtime of such approaches is still impractical for large datasets. In this work, we propose to reduce the runtime of sensitivity-based approaches for k-means by leveraging predictions to approximate the importance of input points. We first formally prove that current theoretical results on coresets construction via sensitivity sampling hold for coarser approximations of sensitivities compared to the one required by existing approaches. This implies that even fairly noisy predictors can be leveraged for sensitivity-sampling approaches. We then propose a natural predictor, which applies to the common scenario where clustering is performed (over time) on a sequence of datasets from the same problem. We prove that when the datasets in the sequence come from the same (unknown) distribution, centers resulting in a low error on one dataset can be used as predictions for sensitivity sampling in subsequent datasets, with guarantees on their quality. We perform an extensive experimental evaluation showing that our approach significantly improves, in terms of clustering cost vs runtime, over uniform sampling and state-of-the-art sensitivity sampling approaches when applied to sequences of datasets.

On-device training of deep neural networks is fundamentally constrained by the computational and memory costs of large-scale datasets. Coreset selection offers a practical solution by retaining only a compact subset of real training samples. However, existing gradient-based methods commonly rely on gradients computed at a single model snapshot and employ greedy or pursuit-based selection procedures, limiting their ability to capture evolving optimization dynamics and handle strongly correlated samples. We propose GLOBE (Gradient Local-Balanced Extraction), a trajectory-aligned coreset selection framework that formulates sample selection as a globally optimized sparse weighting problem. GLOBE represents each sample by a gradient trajectory constructed across multiple training checkpoints, thereby capturing its influence throughout different stages of optimization. To preserve the training behavior of the full dataset, we introduce a multi-order matching objective that jointly aligns the first-order mean and projected uncentered second-order moments of gradient trajectories. GLOBE further combines Group LASSO, Elastic Net regularization, and nonnegative budget constraints to induce group- and sample-level sparsity while stabilizing the weights of correlated trajectories. Finally, class-balanced Top-K selection maintains adequate category coverage under limited sampling budgets. Experiments across six benchmarks and five evaluation architectures demonstrate that GLOBE consistently outperforms existing coreset selection methods in downstream test accuracy, particularly at low retention ratios. These results highlight the effectiveness of combining dynamic gradient information, multi-order distribution matching, and structured sparsity for data-efficient learning.