Organizations: Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo · Shanghai Jiao Tong University · University of Waterloo · The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Abstract
Standard on-policy distillation (OPD) for large language models estimates the reverse-KL objective using student-sampled tokens, yielding an unbiased single-sample Monte Carlo estimator that avoids vocabulary-wide computation. However, we show that this estimator suffers from severe training pathologies in practice: sample inefficiency, unstable generation dynamics, and a substantial performance gap compared to exact full-vocabulary OPD. Reward-level diagnosis traces these pathologies to the log-ratio reward, which is unbounded by construction, producing extremely high-variance gradients concentrated at early positions and persisting throughout training; standard post-hoc scaling fail as they operate only after this distortion occurs. To solve this problem, we propose PowerOPD: a family of natively bounded, sign-consistent rewards from the Box-Cox power transformation, parameterized by alpha > 0, of which the log-ratio is the degenerate alpha -> 0 limit. Across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks and four Qwen3 teacher-student pairs, PowerOPD achieves benchmark-averaged Avg@8/Pass@8 gains of up to +6.37/+5.71 over vanilla OPD, +3.01/+3.54 over post-hoc stabilization, and +2.59/+8.90 over full-vocabulary OPD, while reducing wall-clock time by 59.2% and peak GPU memory by 23.1%. Larger alpha generally improves accuracy, consistently shortens responses, and keeps gradient norms more than 3,000x smaller than vanilla OPD.
On-Policy Distillation (OPD) has emerged as a dominant post-training paradigm for large language models, especially for reasoning domains. However, OPD remains unstable in practice due to the high gradient variance of its single-sample Monte Carlo estimator, and recipes for stable training are still immature. We propose vOPD (On-Policy Distillation with a control variate baseline), which casts OPD as policy-gradient RL and stabilizes it by introducing a control variate baseline-canonically a value function -- from the RL literature. We show that the OPD value function admits a closed form as the per-token negative reverse KL divergence between the student and the teacher, available directly from the already-computed forward pass with no additional critic or inference. Existing stabilization methods either compute the full token-level reverse KL over the entire vocabulary, adding significant overhead, or restrict it to a top-k support, biasing the objective. vOPD instead preserves the lightweight single-sample estimator, subtracting the value function as a detached baseline to keep the gradient unbiased while reducing variance. Furthermore, we show that a top-k approximation of the baseline further lowers cost without compromising performance. Across mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks, vOPD consistently outperforms vanilla OPD and matches the most expensive full-vocabulary baseline, offering an efficient stabilization of On-Policy Distillation through principled RL variance reduction.
On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as an effective approach for large language model post-training, yet existing objectives face a trade-off between objective fidelity and optimization stability. Token-level OPD provides stable but local supervision, whereas sequence-level OPD captures future credit at the cost of horizon-dependent variance. We establish a unified temporal-credit view of these formulations, showing that practical token-level OPD can be interpreted as a temporal approximation to the sequence-level reverse-KL gradient. Building on this connection, we propose γOPD, which uses discounted temporal credit assignment to balance long-horizon supervision and optimization stability, while admitting a horizon-independent variance bound. We further develop a reward-compatible bounded mixing (RBM) mechanism for γOPD that balances verifiable outcome feedback with the discounted OPD advantage to move beyond purely teacher-dependent optimization. Experiments on mathematical and code reasoning demonstrate consistent improvements over existing OPD methods across vanilla, size-mismatched, and multi-teacher distillation settings.
On-policy distillation (OPD) and on-policy self-distillation (OPSD) have emerged as promising post-training methods for large language models, offering dense token-level supervision on trajectories sampled from the model's own policy. However, existing results on their effectiveness remain mixed: while OP(S)D has shown promise in system prompt and knowledge internalization, recent studies also report instability and degradation. In this work, we present a comprehensive empirical study of when OPD and OPSD work, when they fail, and why. We find that OPD on mathematical reasoning is highly sensitive to teacher choice and loss formulation, whereas OPSD fails in our tested settings due to test-time absence of instance-specific privileged information (PI). In contrast, OPSD is effective when PI represents a shared latent rule, such as a system prompt or alignment preference. We identify three failure mechanisms: (1) distribution mismatch between teacher and student caused by conditioning on student-generated prefixes, (2) optimization instability from biased TopK reverse-KL gradients, and (3) an OPSD-specific limitation where the student learns a PI-free policy that aggregates PI-conditioned teachers, which is insufficient when PI is instance-specific. We further show that stop-gradient TopK objectives, RLVR-adapted teachers, and SFT-stabilized students mitigate these failures.