Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) achieve strong performance on a variety of audio understanding tasks but continue to struggle with temporal reasoning, a fundamental capability central to human auditory perception. Understanding the causes of these failures remains challenging as existing benchmarks report performance gaps without probing underlying mechanisms. To address this, we introduce a benchmark with 1,657 questions across three foundational tasks designed specifically for mechanistic analysis. Examining model outputs across varying input settings (behavioral analysis) reveals that models often under-utilize audio when textual cues are available. We also provide the first causal mechanistic analysis of temporal reasoning failures in LALMs. Comparing attention upweighting against scaling, we find that redistributing attention across audio tokens is more effective than increasing audio attention. Targeting task-relevant tokens yields further gains. These findings suggest that modality imbalance alone cannot explain failures. Attention scaling at bottleneck layers improves accuracy from 55.9% to 59.1% without fine-tuning, demonstrating a promising direction for future work.
Test-Time Scaling has shown notable efficacy in addressing complex problems through scaling inference compute. However, within Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs), an unintuitive phenomenon exists: post-training models for structured reasoning trajectories results in marginal or even negative gains compared to post-training for direct answering. To investigate it, we introduce CAFE, an evaluation framework designed to precisely quantify audio reasoning errors. Evaluation results reveal LALMs struggle with perception during reasoning and encounter a critical bottleneck: reasoning performance suffers from audio perception decay as reasoning length extends. To address it, we propose MPAR2, a paradigm that encourages dynamic perceptual reasoning and decomposes complex questions into perception-rich sub-problems. Leveraging reinforcement learning, MPAR2 improves perception performance on CAFE from 31.74% to 63.51% and effectively mitigates perception decay, concurrently enhancing reasoning capabilities to achieve a significant 74.59% accuracy on the MMAU benchmark. Further analysis demonstrates that MPAR2 reinforces LALMs to attend to audio input and dynamically adapts reasoning budget to match task complexity.
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have shown strong performance on audio reasoning benchmarks, but accuracy alone cannot distinguish true reasoning from superficial pattern matching, often overestimating reasoning ability since high scores may result from guessing rather than genuine audio understanding. Evaluating the reasoning process itself is essential for improving LALMs' reasoning ability, yet remains challenging. Existing methods either rely on costly human annotation or opaque LLM-as-judge approaches, making them impractical, biased, and lacking transparency. Moreover, audio reasoning introduces unique challenges absent in text-based settings, perceptual hallucination and cross-modal alignment between audio understanding and textual inference, hence text-based evaluation frameworks cannot be directly applied. Therefore, we propose ARIA-Rubrics (Audio Reasoning Integrity Assessment), a lightweight, annotation-free gold reasoning chains, automatic and transparent framework comprising six complementary metrics that evaluate audio reasoning quality across perceptual grounding, reasoning coherence, and answer consistency. We use Chain-of-Thought prompting as an externalization mechanism to make the reasoning process observable. Experiments on 9 models across 2 benchmarks identify three reasoning modes of current LALMs with actionable directions for future development, with ARIA-Rubrics achieving high correlation with human judgments. The code is available at the Github Repository.
Large audio-language models (LALMs) are increasingly used for a broader range of audio reasoning tasks. These models typically incorporate audio representations into a large language model (LLM) backbone to enable multimodal reasoning. Recent test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) methods further improve LLM reasoning capability by leveraging unlabelled test data after pre-training. However, the importance of the perceptual capability of LALMs remains underexplored, particularly how much acoustic evidence is integrated and relied upon during reasoning, and how this contributes to final task performance. This gap limits the development of effective post-training methods like TTRL for audio reasoning. In this work, we first analyse how audio information is integrated and utilised during reasoning process. We quantify layer-wise perceptual reliance and show that stronger acoustic reliance is associated with higher accuracy and a larger performance gain attributable to the audio input. Building on this, we propose Perception-Grounded TTRL (PG-TTRL), which aligns label-free test-time optimisation with perceptually grounded reasoning, encouraging the model to structure its reasoning more strongly on the audio input. Experiments across LALMs and benchmarks show that PG-TTRL consistently improves reasoning performance over both the base models and standard TTRL, showing the value of perceptual-grounding optimisation for test-time audio reasoning.