Memory as a Wasting Asset: Pricing Flash Endurance for Embodied Agents, and the Limits of Doing So

The KV-cache is the right memory for datacenters but the wrong memory for robots. Datacenter inference batches many short requests and resets them, amortizing an attention cache across a crowd. Embodied agents instead run one long, non-resetting episode on bandwidth-limited edge hardware, where high-bandwidth memory and flash are scarce, flash has finite write endurance, and memory writes rather than compute can become the binding constraint. AURA-Mem (Action-Utility Recurrent Adaptive Memory) targets this regime. It wraps a frozen vision-language-action backbone with a constant-size recurrent memory and a learned gate that writes only when the current observation would change the next action: memory that knows when to stay silent. Unlike reconstruction-based memory, the gate is trained directly against a closed-loop action-error signal. Its inference state is fixed at 4,224 bytes regardless of horizon, while a KV-cache grows to 6,061 times larger at 100,000 steps. On a controlled synthetic benchmark, AURA-Mem matches the best O(1) baseline in accuracy while using 5.19-6.13 times fewer writes, and up to 9.19 times fewer writes on easier configurations. Budget-matched random and periodic schedules do not recover this gain, isolating the benefit to the action-surprise signal. On a trained closed-loop OpenVLA-OFT 7B panel on LIBERO-Long (n=60 episodes per arm), the gate does not hurt success: AURA-Mem matches the ungated base policy (0.233) and slightly exceeds an always-write KV arm (0.217), while using 7.0 times fewer writes and constant memory. We also instantiate an approximate-information-state value-loss bound as a methodology demonstration; at this scale, the bound is vacuous rather than a guarantee.

On-device language-model agents improve by accumulating experience in retrieved memory rather than by updating weights. This memory is hard-bounded and exposed: it consumes RAM and energy, reaches peers through a thin uplink, and becomes an attack surface because it is writable by what the agent reads. Existing systems each cover one part of this problem: agentic memories grow without a budget, on-device methods keep entries by success alone, and poisoning is studied mainly as an attack rather than as a memory-governance problem. We propose \sys{}, a single net-value-per-byte score that governs an agent's experience-memory lifecycle. The main idea is to let the budget act as the curator: each entry is scored as value minus harm, per byte, so one ruler decides what to keep, share, and trust. \sys{} makes three decisions: (1) \textbf{KEEP} evicts low-value bytes under the RAM and energy budget; (2) \textbf{SHARE} sends an insight only when its value exceeds its uplink cost; and (3) \textbf{TRUST} gates a peer entry by provenance. On language-model-agent task-drift benchmarks and a real heterogeneous Jetson testbed with two robot-arm nodes and a hub, \sys{} reduces memory by $2.7\times$ and uplink by $2.4\times$, drives injection success from 0.75 to zero, and raises accuracy on cases corrupted by poison or stale memory. Curating by net value reduces footprint, energy, uplink, and injection success together without reducing accuracy. In this setting, forgetting by net value improves the agent rather than weakening it.

Embodied agents accumulate experience over time. We study how accumulated experience can be formed into persistent memory for future reasoning and action. We formulate Embodied Action Memory (EAM) as the capability to form and use memory over embodied experience, together with the persistent memory state produced by that process. We introduce MEMORA, a framework that instantiates EAM through a formation-consolidation-retrieval lifecycle and a multi-store world-memory architecture. MEMORA organizes experience into participant-specific Environment, Entity, Activity, and Inferred Knowledge stores: online editing revises memory as new evidence arrives, while offline consolidation abstracts repeated experience into reusable routines, habits, and preferences. We evaluate MEMORA with MEMORA-Bench, a 45-hour egocentric-video suite that measures both retrospective memory faithfulness and prospective memory-grounded planning. Across four open-weight answer models, MEMORA achieves the strongest aggregate planning performance among the evaluated memory interfaces, with its largest gains on out-of-distribution planning. On these tasks, MEMORA improves Robot-Grounded Plan score by up to 16.6 percent, suggesting that memory formed and consolidated across experience can support planning for new goals beyond directly observed episodes. A physical-robot demonstration further shows that memory formed solely from human egocentric video can ground high-level robot plans in participant-specific objects and preferences. Project website: https://github.com/yuzihaowashu/MEMORA