Two-Phase Bilevel Search for the Moving-Target Traveling Salesman Problem with Moving Obstacles

The Moving Target Vehicle Routing Problem with Obstacles (MT-VRP-O) seeks trajectories for several agents that collectively intercept a set of moving targets. Each target has one or more time windows where it can be visited, and the agents must avoid static obstacles and satisfy speed and capacity constraints. Previously studied VRPs are often addressed using a framework called branch-and-price. This framework requires computing the cost for a single agent to visit a given sequence of target-time window pairings, for several candidate sequences. These sequences are called tours. Computing tour costs is more expensive in the MT-VRP-O than in previously studied VRPs due to the presence of both moving targets and static obstacles. Thus, we introduce a new exact algorithm, Lazy Branch-and-Price with Relaxed Continuity (Lazy BPRC), for the MT-VRP-O. The key idea in Lazy BPRC is to use cheap-to-compute lower bounds on tour costs where costs are traditionally used, and lazily update lower bounds to true costs. When computing a tour's true cost is needed, we do so by searching for a shortest path on a graph of convex sets, and we introduce a new heuristic to accelerate the search. We demonstrate that Lazy BPRC runs up to an order of magnitude faster than two ablations.

In many real-world settings, problem instances that need to be solved are quite similar, and knowledge from previous optimization runs can potentially be utilized. We explore this for the Traveling Salesperson problem with time windows (TSPTW), which often arises in settings where the travel-time matrix is fixed but time-window constraints change across related tasks. Existing TSPTW studies, however, have not systematically compared solving such task sequences independently with sequential transfer from previously solved tasks. We address this gap using a multi-task benchmark in which each base instance is expanded into five related tasks under two environments: partial time-window expansion and swap-additive time reassignment. We compare a standard from-scratch protocol with an iterative protocol that initializes each task from the best tour of the previous task, using the popular local search approaches LNS, VNS, and LKH-3 under a common penalized-score objective. Our experimental results show that the iterative protocol is consistently superior in the progressive-relaxation setting and generally competitive under swap-additive changes, with improvements increasing on more difficult instances.

Evolutionary multitasking allows several related problems to be solved in a single run of an algorithm. In this paper, we investigate integrating evolutionary multitasking with Edge Assembly Crossover (MT-EAX) to solve the classical Travelling Salesperson Problem (TSP). To fairly compare MT-EAX against standard EAX under strict compute budgets, we evaluate three scaling methods: generation scaling, population scaling, and balanced scaling. Our results show that generationally scaled MT-EAX is highly effective compute-wise in the early stages of the search, saving $60\%$ to $90\%$ of compute for equal or better solution quality. We observe that instance geometry has a significant impact, with clustered, normally distributed instances securing larger improvements than uniformly distributed ones. However, when scaling by population or utilising explicit solution transfer, the results are negative due to population starvation and incompatible cross-instance parent selection. We demonstrate that the advantage of MT-EAX derives from increased diversity through parallel search in early generations, which can be successfully preserved using a decoupled configuration to often strictly outperform or match standard EAX performance at final convergence.