We study how trajectory-shape diversity in demonstrations affects imitation learning (IL) performance across models, tasks, and data scales. We introduce Geometric Entropy (H_G), a task-agnostic metric that quantifies the intrinsic diversity of transit trajectories after normalizing away extrinsic variation, such as goal pose and workspace scale, via target-frame alignment. Across multiple IL architectures and both simulated and real-robot contact-rich manipulation tasks, we observe a consistent inverted-U relationship between success and H_G: increasing geometric diversity improves robustness in low-diversity regimes but degrades performance once diversity induces strategy ambiguity. Moreover, the optimal entropy shifts toward lower values as task mastery increases through more data, easier tasks, or stronger priors, and for a pretrained vision-language-action model the trend becomes effectively monotonic decreasing. Practically, H_G enables fast pre-training auditing of demonstration datasets and offers a simple guideline for calibrating demonstrations toward the learnable regime.
Applying an imitation learning policy to a new manipulation task usually requires collecting new demonstrations and retraining the model, which makes sample efficiency a practical concern. Pretraining on large-scale robot datasets is effective in this respect, but such datasets are costly to collect and train on, while data augmentation techniques typically require a new round of data generation and retraining for each task. A complementary question is what useful prior can be provided to a policy at negligible cost before any task-specific data are collected. In this study, we construct a geometric visual pretraining dataset in which each scene contains only a plane, an object, and a hand, and trajectories are generated automatically. The scenes contain neither textures nor backgrounds; pretraining primarily exposes the policy to the geometric relationship between the hand and the object. Furthermore, representing the hand as a cube avoids tailoring the dataset to a specific robot morphology. We evaluate this geometric prior using ACT on three simulated robots across five manipulation tasks each, as well as on three real-world robot tasks. Across many of these robot--task combinations, fine-tuning from the geometric prior achieves higher success rates in the early stages of training than training from scratch while using only a small number of task demonstrations. These results suggest that even highly simplified geometric scenes can provide a useful initialization that transfers across robots and to real-world tasks when task data are limited.
A robot that can be taught a new task from a handful of demonstrations has to work out for itself what it still cannot do, and then ask for exactly that. Interactive imitation learning takes a step in that direction by letting a policy practice on its own and calling an expert when it goes wrong. Existing methods decide when to interrupt the learner. A further 2 decisions are left to whichever episode happened to trigger the interruption: which failure to correct, and where the demonstration should start. This paper is a first attempt at making both of them deliberately. DISEIL (Demonstration dIstillation for Sample-Efficient Imitation Learning) marks each failed episode at the step where the policy first becomes unreliable, represents that moment with a geometric descriptor, and groups the failures into recurring failure modes. A vision-language model and a language model read the selected mode and write a request for the next demonstration, and a store of task constraints checks that the request can be carried out before any expert time is spent. No model produces a robot action. Across 5 simulated tasks under state and image observations, changing only what the expert is asked for gives the highest mean held-out success rate in all 10 settings, with a tie in 1, and the margin is widest at the smallest budget we tested. The scope is narrow: a single round of practice at a time, in simulation, with experts that are mostly scripted. The longer-term aim is a learner that also tracks what its demonstration set already covers, and that asks a human teacher for the missing behavior in proportion to the effort each request costs them.
Imitation learning is effective for training agents when expert demonstrations are available, but collecting demonstrations for every complex task in an environment is costly. We study the long-horizon, goal-conditioned setting where a fixed demonstration dataset contains useful behavior, but not complete examples for every task the agent must solve. Existing imitation learning methods can learn strong policies from demonstrations, but when solving long-horizon tasks, small errors accumulate over long primitive-action trajectories and make zero-shot adaptation to new tasks unreliable. We introduce Zero-shot Agents from Latent Topologies (ZALT), an imitation-learning method that solves unseen start-goal tasks beyond those demonstrated during training. ZALT identifies latent hub states where trajectories converge or diverge, learns policies and a dynamics model over hub-to-hub transitions, and plans over the hub topology to complete new tasks. This topology makes demonstrated behaviors explicitly composable while compressing long tasks into shorter sequences of abstract transitions -- combined, these enable ZALT to perform zero-shot adaptation. In a complex 3D maze environment, ZALT achieves 55% zero-shot success on unseen tasks, compared to 6% for the strongest baseline.