Despite modeling temporal motion, dynamic 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) methods still inherit a static densification strategy that is ill-suited for dynamic scenes. This neglect of temporal behavior leads to under-reconstructed and blurry dynamic regions, as short-lived Gaussians receive sparse supervision and fail to densify effectively. We propose a Visibility-Aware Densification (VAD) framework that integrates temporal visibility into the densification process, ensuring that Gaussians are refined based on their actual temporal presence. A Temporally-Adaptive Thresholding (TAT) mechanism further adjusts each Gaussian's densification threshold according to its temporal lifespan, promoting balanced refinement of both static and dynamic regions. Finally, a Temporal Offset Warping (TOW) design enhances deformation capacity around temporal centers, extending the lifespan of highly dynamic Gaussians and facilitating more effective densification. Our approach achieves substantial improvements in the visual quality of dynamic regions, outperforming existing methods across three dynamic multi-view benchmark datasets. Moreover, the proposed VAD module generalizes across diverse dynamic 3DGS methods, consistently improving dynamic reconstruction as a plug-and-play component.
Recent extensions of 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) enable real-time novel view synthesis in dynamic scenes by learning time-conditioned Gaussian deformations. However, existing MLP-based methods typically estimate deformations independently at each timestamp, making them less robust to large or abrupt motions. To address this issue, we propose \textbf{EvoGS}, a 3DGS-based dynamic reconstruction framework that models Gaussian deformation as a temporal evolution process. EvoGS maintains persistent deformation states for each Gaussian, extrapolates future states from historical deformation states, and corrects the predictions with MLP-derived observations. The correction is adaptively weighted using a temporal residual memory and evolution statistics such as deformation velocity and trajectory deviation. To further improve reconstruction quality, EvoGS introduces deformation-aware densification. Clone and split operations are performed along corrected deformation directions, while an uncertainty-aware strategy suppresses densification for Gaussians with unstable deformation histories. Experiments show that EvoGS improves dynamic novel view synthesis quality and achieves competitive performance across benchmarks.
3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) enables real-time novel view synthesis for static scenes. Extending it to dynamic scenes via deformation fields has recently attracted significant attention, particularly for dynamic scene reconstructionband distractor-free. However, existing deformation networks lack explicit motion awareness: they neither capture long-term motion intensity nor exploit short-term temporal coherence, leading to inaccurate foreground deformation and pseudo-static residuals in the background. We present MVFusion-GS, a method that enhances deformation networks with two complementary motion-aware mechanisms. The Motion-Variance Guided Refinement aggregates per-Gaussian deformation statistics across time to estimate motion variance and uses it to guide dynamic-static separation during deformation prediction. The MotionFormer Temporal Attention module applies Transformer self-attention over neighboring timesteps to model local motion dependencies and improve temporal consistency. Extensive experiments on both dynamic scene reconstruction and distractor-free reconstruction benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, showing that explicit motion awareness improves both foreground motion modeling and static background reconstruction.
Dynamic scene reconstruction via 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) has emerged as a compelling approach for representing evolving environments, yet understanding trade-offs between methodologies remains crucial. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of dynamic 3DGS methods, categorizing them into two paradigms: structure-guided methods employing auxiliary representations (deformation fields, canonical spaces, grids) to model temporal changes, and gaussian-centric methods encoding dynamics directly into primitives via continuous functions or 4D representations. We evaluate representative methods from both paradigms on the D-NeRF benchmark. Our findings reveal that structure-guided methods achieve superior reconstruction fidelity and compact model sizes, while gaussian-centric approaches demonstrate significantly higher rendering speeds enabling real-time performance, though with greater quality variability and potentially substantial storage overhead. This analysis highlights a fundamental trade-off between reconstruction quality/compactness versus rendering speed, providing insights to guide future research and application development in dynamic scene reconstruction.