q-bio.QMJun 21, 2026

Performance and Interpretability of Convolutional, Transformer, and Hybrid Deep Learning Models in Colorectal Histology Classification

Authors: Reza Bozorgpour

Organizations: College of Engineering & Applied Science, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA

Abstract

Deep learning has become an important tool in computational pathology, enabling automated analysis of histopathological images. While convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have traditionally dominated this field, transformer-based and hybrid architectures have recently demonstrated promising performance. However, comprehensive comparisons of these approaches for colorectal histopathology remain limited. This study evaluated twelve ImageNet-pretrained CNN, transformer, and hybrid architectures using the Kather colorectal histopathology dataset containing 5,000 image tiles from eight tissue classes. All models were trained using a standardized transfer-learning and fine-tuning protocol and assessed using multiple performance metrics, including accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, ROC-AUC, Cohen's kappa, and Matthews correlation coefficient. All evaluated models achieved high classification performance, with accuracies ranging from 93.2% to 97.1%. EVA-02 achieved the highest overall performance (97.1% accuracy, 97.0% F1-score), closely followed by ViT-B/16. Among CNNs, ResNet34 and ConvNeXt-Tiny demonstrated highly competitive performance, achieving accuracies of 96.4% and 96.3%, respectively. Transformer architectures generally produced the strongest results across evaluation metrics, although the performance gap between the best transformer and CNN models was relatively small. Per-class analysis showed consistently strong classification performance across all tissue categories, with Complex Stroma representing the most challenging class. Overall, transformer-based architectures achieved the highest predictive performance, whereas modern CNNs provided a favorable balance between accuracy and model complexity. These findings provide a comprehensive benchmark of major deep learning paradigms for colorectal histopathology classification.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Sep 12, 2026cs.CV

A Comparative Evaluation of Pre-trained Convolutional Neural Networks for Melanoma Detection

Early diagnosis of melanoma is critical for improving patient survival rates. However, accurately distinguishing melanoma from other skin lesions remains a significant clinical challenge due to the high visual similarity among lesion types and variability in image acquisition conditions. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning, has emerged as a promising tool to support dermatological diagnosis by automating feature extraction from medical images. Among the available approaches, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have demonstrated strong performance in image classification tasks, making them well-suited for analyzing both dermatoscopic and histopathological images, given their ability to capture hierarchical visual patterns relevant to lesion characterization. Nevertheless, despite numerous pre-trained CNN architectures having been proposed, selecting the most appropriate one for a given imaging modality remains an open challenge. In this study, we evaluate pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for skin lesion classification using dermatoscopic and histopathological image datasets. Experiments were conducted on the HAM10000, ISIC 2018, and CR-AI4SkIN datasets, evaluating the ResNet50, VGG16, VGG19, MobileNet, and InceptionV3 architectures under the same training protocol. The experimental evaluation showed that the models achieved accuracies ranging from 71% (InceptionV3 on ISIC 2018) to 84% (ResNet50 on HAM10000) on dermatoscopic images. For histopathological images, accuracies ranged from 72% (VGG19) to 83% (ResNet50) on the CR-AI4SkIN dataset. The results demonstrate that model performance differs between dermatoscopic and histopathological image modalities, showing that architectures exhibiting similar performance on dermatoscopic images exhibit different performance on histopathological data.
Wagner Moreno Schmitz, Marco Antonio de Castro Barbosa, Thiago Magalhães Amaral +2
Skin Lesion ClassificationConvolutional Neural NetworksLesion SegmentationDigital Pathology
AskPDF
Jun 17, 2026cs.CV

Multi-Class Brain Tumor Classification Using Advanced Deep Learning Models: A Comparative Study

Despite recent advancements in deep learning, accurately classifying brain tumors from MRI images continues to pose challenges. In this research, we present a comprehensive evaluation of five different convolutional neural networks (CNN) architectures, including a customized baseline model and four pre-trained models - for use in classifying multi-class brain tumors using a clinically-sourced dataset of approximately 10,000 MRI images. We have utilized five different architectures; VGG16, VGG19, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0, which were all tested and trained within an identical experimental framework. Performance was measured by both overall accuracy and tumor-wise recall as a means to measure the clinically-relevant performance of each architecture. We found that EfficientNetB0 had the best overall classification accuracy at 95%, when compared to the other architectures tested; specifically VGG16 (94.37%), VGG19 (92.29%), DenseNet121 (90.91%) and the customized CNN (78.00%). An especially important finding of our research was the considerable improvement in detecting meningiomas; specifically, while simple CNNs could detect meningiomas with a recall rate of approximately 20%, EfficientNetB0 was able to detect meningiomas with a recall rate of 89%. Meningiomas are often difficult to detect because they can appear very subtly on MRI images. Additionally, an interesting finding was that the deeper VGG19 performed worse than the shallower VGG16. This indicates that in many cases the architectural efficiency of a CNN model may be more important than its depth when working with medical images. Overall, EfficientNetB0 appears to provide the optimal trade-off between classification accuracy, number of parameters used in the model and clinically meaningful performance.
Asad Channa, Asghar Ali Chandio, Akhtar Hussain Jalbani +2
Brain Tumor ClassificationConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep Learning ModelsComparison
AskPDF
May 25, 2026cs.CV

CNNs, Transformers, Hybrid, and Vision Language Models for Skin Cancer Detection

Skin cancer is a common and fast rising malignancy worldwide. Early detection is critical for improving outcomes. Deep learning models trained on dermoscopic and clinical images can support automated and fast triage. However, many studies evaluate only a limited set of architectures. Experimental setups also vary across studies. In this paper, we present a unified evaluation of twelve deep learning models for binary skin cancer detection on the PAD-UFES-20 dataset. The models span four families: convolutional neural networks (CNN), vision transformers (ViT), hybrid convolution transformer backbones, and vision language models (VLM). Performance is assessed using AUC, the maximum F1 score with its precision and recall, and sensitivity at 80% specificity, reflecting screening oriented requirements. Our results show that well tuned CNNs already provide strong baselines, but transformer based families consistently improve discrimination. Hybrid models (MaxViT Tiny, CoAtNet0) and a SigLIP based VLM achieve the best overall trade off between ranking performance and clinically relevant operating points, while CLIP based model offers high precision. The full codebase for all experiments is publicly released. Together, these findings offer practical guidance on which model families are most suitable for real world deployment in skin cancer screening and establish a reproducible reference point for future work on PAD-UFES-20.
Durjoy Dey, Yuhong Yan, Hassan Hajjdiab
Skin Lesion ClassificationHybrid TransformerDeep Learning ModelsConvolutional Neural NetworksAuc-RocTriage+1
AskPDF