How Complexity Contributes to Learning Opacity in Machine Learning

Algorithmic Information Dynamics (AID) studies systems by perturbing them and measuring changes in algorithmic complexity, but its usual estimator, the Block Decomposition Method, is piecewise constant, restricting the calculus to finite differences. We use $K^{\mathrm{CDM}}_{\mathrm{s}F}$, a certified, differentiable estimator, to bring the calculus into learning dynamics: grokking, where a complexity order parameter is known but has not been made to act. As a transient loss kick, the estimator becomes a controller that accelerates grokking in Levin's description-length--versus-time sense, within a data-dependent Occam boundary whose finite-size trend, $f_c\sim\ln p/p$, is consistent with a coupon-collector interpretation. Ablations show that a complexity gate matches a train-loss gate in rescuing failing seeds with $27\%$ less intervention; among the tested signals, only map complexity marks the transition's completion; the certified prior and the per-parameter $\nabla K$ attribution are both fungible (a uniform-prior sensor makes bit-identical gate decisions, and random supports match $\nabla K$-selected ones above a sparsity threshold); and direct field perturbation shows a nucleation-like response to the Occam field (no linear regime is resolved over the probed amplitudes, so these measurements do not justify a fluctuation--dissipation surrogate), with a finite-field response growing by orders of magnitude toward the phase-transition. These measurements account for the empirically tuned staircase: bang--bang pulses, stall-fired and released on yield, whose iteration plausibly builds the response it exploits. The kick transfers to sparse parity and to a transformer; a sustained weight-space loss fails. The algorithmic estimator's distinct contribution is timing (when to fire and when to release), not attribution.

In this paper, we make the case that a scientific theory of deep learning is emerging. By this we mean a theory which characterizes important properties and statistics of the training process, hidden representations, final weights, and performance of neural networks. We pull together major strands of ongoing research in deep learning theory and identify five growing bodies of work that point toward such a theory: (a) solvable idealized settings that provide intuition for learning dynamics in realistic systems; (b) tractable limits that reveal insights into fundamental learning phenomena; (c) simple mathematical laws that capture important macroscopic observables; (d) theories of hyperparameters that disentangle them from the rest of the training process, leaving simpler systems behind; and (e) universal behaviors shared across systems and settings which clarify which phenomena call for explanation. Taken together, these bodies of work share certain broad traits: they are concerned with the dynamics of the training process; they primarily seek to describe coarse aggregate statistics; and they emphasize falsifiable quantitative predictions. We argue that the emerging theory is best thought of as a mechanics of the learning process, and suggest the name learning mechanics. We discuss the relationship between this mechanics perspective and other approaches for building a theory of deep learning, including the statistical and information-theoretic perspectives. In particular, we anticipate a symbiotic relationship between learning mechanics and mechanistic interpretability. We also review and address common arguments that fundamental theory will not be possible or is not important. We conclude with a portrait of important open directions in learning mechanics and advice for beginners. We host further introductory materials, perspectives, and open questions at learningmechanics.pub.

Artificial neural networks (NNs) and machine learning (ML) algorithms are poorly understood from a theoretical perspective, which makes it difficult to fully realize their potential and overcome their weaknesses. For instance, ML algorithms train NN weights by moving them along a low-dimensional subspace of their allowed values, but this implicitly low-dimensional learning structure is not properly exploited to improve training because its nature is not well understood. Moreover, trained NNs are easily confused by pervasive adversarial attacks whose theoretical underpinnings are still unclear. This thesis aims to improve our theoretical understanding of NNs and ML, with a particular focus on adversarial attacks and implicitly low-dimensional learning. For this purpose, we use mathematical tools from statistical mechanics to study different types of NNs and ways in which they can fit the data. In particular, we study two classes of models that fit the data with various degrees of learning and memorization: dense associative memory (DAM) and restricted Boltzmann machines (RBM). In the process, we investigate connections between different versions of these models that are useful to make analytical investigations more efficient.