Learning Diachronic Representations of Ancient Greek Letterforms
Authors: John Pavlopoulos, Spyros Barbakos, Lavinia Ferretti, Dionysis Voulgarakis, Asimina Paparrigopoulou, Maria Konstantinidou, Giuseppe De Gregorio, Isabelle Marthot-Santaniello, +2 more
Organizations: Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece · Archimedes, Athena Research Center, Greece · Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Sweden · Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy · University of Basel, Switzerland · Democritus University of Thrace, Greece · Computer Vision Center (CVC) - Barcelona, Spain · Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Germany
Abstract
Learning representations that remain robust across centuries of variation in handwriting is a key challenge in diachronic representation learning. Taking one of the longest continuously used writing systems, ancient Greek, as a case study, we introduce three datasets for diachronic representation learning: Hell-Char, a curated training set spanning the 3rd-1st centuries BCE, and two evaluation sets, PaLit-Char (2nd-5th c. CE) and Med-Char (9th-14th c. CE). To address the challenges of symbolic variation, scarce data, and systematic degradation, we propose: a similarity-weighted supervised contrastive loss that biases embeddings using dynamically estimated inter-class similarities, and a lacuna-driven augmentation scheme that simulates realistic manuscript corruptions. Trained with these strategies, both a lightweight CNN and a pretrained ResNet achieve strong recognition performance and produce embeddings that more coherently separate character classes than PCA or generic pretrained models. These embeddings enable clustering, identification of stylistic subgroups, and construction of prototype images that visualize diachronic evolution and transitional letterforms. Our results demonstrate that respecting intrinsic inter-letter relationships and augmenting with domain-informed corruptions yield robust, interpretable representations, offering a transferable paradigm for representation learning under scarce, temporally evolving, and noisy conditions. Code and data available at: https://github.com/ipavlopoulos/diachronic-greek-letterforms.
We introduce Stoicheia, a 405M-parameter character-level masked-diffusion encoder for Ancient Greek whose input factors into five aligned, independently maskable planes: letters, word and sentence boundaries, diacritics, capitalization, and punctuation. A single backbone can therefore restore lacunae, re-segment, accentuate, and punctuate unspaced text without task-specific retokenization. We pretrain it on an open, revision-pinned corpus of 380M words and release eleven checkpoints: ten rotated, decontaminated folds, guaranteeing that for any given literary passage at least one released model has never seen its text, and one with no exposure to documentary texts. Three experiments - reconstruction of damaged inscriptions and papyri, morphosyntactic tagging and dependency parsing, and macronization with metrical scansion - each carry a matched random-initialization control, isolating what character-level diffusion pretraining contributes: 5.6 CER points on inscription reconstruction, 12.9 LAS on parsing, and 6.0 points of balanced accuracy on macronization. On Ithaca's own test split, with identical frozen samples and strict scoring, Stoicheia reduces character error relative to both prior state-of-the-art systems, from 24.6 (Ithaca) and 23.5 (its 2025 Aeneas-framework successor) to 15.5, and raises top-1 accuracy from 63.0 and 64.0 to 74.5.
Vision Large Language Models (VLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in modern text-rich visual understanding. However, their perceptual robustness in the face of the continuous morphological evolution of historical writing systems remains largely unexplored. Existing ancient text datasets typically focus on isolated historical periods, failing to capture the systematic visual distribution shifts spanning thousands of years. To bridge this gap and empower Digital Humanities, we introduce Chronicles-OCR, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the cross-temporal visual perception capabilities of VLLMs across the complete evolutionary trajectory of Chinese characters, known as the Seven Chinese Scripts. Curated in collaboration with top-tier institutional domain experts, the dataset comprises 2,800 strictly balanced images encompassing highly diverse physical media, ranging from tortoise shells to paper-based calligraphy. To accommodate the drastic morphological and topological variations across different historical stages, we propose a novel Stage-Adaptive Annotation Paradigm. Based on this, Chronicles-OCR formulates four rigorous quantitative tasks: cross-period character spotting, fine-grained archaic character recognition via visual referring, ancient text parsing, and script classification. By isolating visual perception from semantic reasoning, Chronicles-OCR provides an authoritative platform to expose the limitations of current VLLMs, paving the way for robust, evolution-aware historical text perception. Chronicles-OCR is publicly available at https://github.com/VirtualLUOUCAS/Chronicles-OCR.
Recent studies have shown that handwritten text recognition (HTR) systems perform worse on Arabic-script datasets than on Latin-script data. However, the reasons for this gap are still not well understood due to the lack of controlled comparisons. In this work, we present a comprehensive study of Arabic and Latin scripts HTR using a unified CRNN model for line-level HTR across nine datasets (including KHATT (Arabic), Muharaf (Arabic), NUST-UHWR (Urdu), PHTD (Persian), IAM (English), READ-2016 (German), and others) and di ferent training sizes (K in {100, 500, 1000, 2000, ..., Kfull}). Our results show the performance gap remains: it is large in low-resource settings, decreases with more data, but remains even at full scale, with a consistent difference of 5-7 CER points. We show that annotation quality matters, as many datasets contain labeling errors. Cleaning reduces error rates and narrows the gap, but does not eliminate it. In addition, we find that a fixed number of training samples provides less effective coverage in Arabic due to higher visual variability, requiring more data to learn similar representations. We compare recognition across datasets in terms of the number of text lines and the number of characters, showing an equivalence trade-off. We compare character frequency distributions across scripts and show that Arabic is significantly more heavy-tailed than Latin. Our error analysis reveals that around 30 percent of substitution errors in Arabic datasets (e.g., KHATT) are caused by confusion between visually similar characters, compared to about 15 percent in Latin-script datasets such as IAM.