Computational Analysis of Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults
Authors: María J. Lado, Arturo J. Méndez, Leandro Rodriguez-Liñares, Baltasar García Pérez-Schofield, Pedro Cuesta-Morales, Brais Iglesias-Otero, Xose A. Vila
Organizations: Escola Superior de Enxeñaría Informática, IFCAE - Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas, Ourense, 32004, Spain. · Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Telecomunicac, Informat Proc & Telecommun Ctr, Speech Technol & Machine Learning Grp, Madrid, 28040, Spain
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) analysis is a key indicator of cardiac physiological state and aids in disease diagnosis. However, research on HRV parameters in healthy individuals remains limited, and no gold standard exists. This study evaluates HRV indices in 40 healthy adults (20 men, 20 women, aged 30-50) to improve HRV's clinical utility. Using computational methods for signal processing and data analysis, time, frequency, and nonlinear indices were analyzed to address five questions: (1) normality, (2) stability, (3) correlation, (4) reproducibility, and (5) consistency. Key findings: (1) Time-domain and nonlinear indices, particularly global and LF (low frequency), follow normal distributions, with gender differences noted. (2) Most indices are stable except HF (high frequency)-related ones. (3) High correlations in HF-related indices suggest redundancy, indicating only one is necessary in studies. (4) Comparisons with the Fantasia database revealed less than 10% error for most indices, except SD2 and SDNN in women (greater than 15%). (5) Time-domain and nonlinear indices show low inter-study variability, while frequency-domain indices exhibit high variability, limiting cross-study comparisons. The selected indices-ApEn and IRRR (global variability), HRVi and SD2 (LF), and MADRR or rMSSD (HF)-are best suited for accurately representing HRV components and enhancing its clinical and research relevance.
Short-term Heart Rate Variability (HRV) forecasting could provide clinicians with actionable lead time for detecting autonomic dysfunction and adverse cardiac events. Consumer wearable devices generate fragmented, artifact-rich HRV signals that challenge conventional forecasting approaches. In this study, we evaluated the forecasting ability of three Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs), TimesFM, Chronos, and MOIRAI, against traditional baselines (Mean, Exponential Smoothing, and Exponentially Weighted Moving Average) on real-world wearable data collected from 49 healthy individuals. To address data fragmentation, we introduce a variability-preserving imputation method that augments linear interpolation with locally adaptive stochastic noise, retaining physiological dynamics essential for accurate forecasting. The results show that TSFMs outperformed all baselines without fine-tuning, achieving average Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE) between 0.81 and 0.87 across TSFMs and both context lengths (32 and 64 time steps), with Chronos and TimesFM as the top models, though MOIRAI showed limited gains over baselines. With up to a 2-hour forecast horizon, the results establish a baseline for TSFMs' performance on a real-world dataset, highlighting domain-specific fine-tuning as a promising direction for clinical deployment.
Cardiovascular stability estimation from wearable photoplethysmography (PPG) requires a principled nonlinear framework, yet major gaps persist in heuristic parameter selection and evaluation protocols that inflate reported performance. We introduce a Stability-Constrained Cardiovascular Stability Index (SCSI) grounded in Cardiac Stability Theory and validate it across 176,742 segments from four heterogeneous PPG datasets at three temporal scales. Cross-dataset analysis demonstrates a large Kruskal-Wallis effect size (eta2 = 0.351, p < 0.001), strong cross-scale consistency (kappa > 0.97), and significant correlation with respiratory rate across 53 ICU records (Spearman r = 0.346, p = 0.011). We identify three evaluation artifacts that inflate heuristic AUC from a true baseline of 0.573 to 0.752: segment-level cross-validation leakage, test-set normalization leakage, and pooled-AUC overweighting that conceals per-patient failure. Correcting these artifacts and applying Bayesian optimization over 15 joint parameters yields SCSI with cross-validation AUC of 0.720. On 18 held-out records, SCSI achieves pooled AUC of 0.757 (95% CI: 0.686-0.828) and negative predictive value of 0.966 for tachypnea screening, while per-record AUC of 0.497 +/- 0.207 is disclosed for transparency. External validation on 42 elective-surgery records yields AUC of 0.621, confirming cross-population generalization. Ablation analysis identifies the nonlinear complexity module as the dominant component. A sparse three-component architecture is proposed as the minimal deployable configuration. The corrected protocol provides a reproducible benchmark for future wearable cardiovascular stability indices.
The cardiovascular system evolves along a bounded trajectory in physiological state space that converges to a compact geometric object: the cardiac attractor. A wearable photoplethysmograph (PPG) or electrocardiograph (ECG) observes a one-dimensional projection of this attractor; by Takens' embedding theorem, delay coordinates reconstruct its full geometry. Three decades of nonlinear cardiac dynamics have extracted Lyapunov exponents, recurrence statistics, and sample entropy from reconstructed attractors, yet no principled account exists of which attractor properties capture which cardiovascular quantities, or why, leaving feature selection as a search problem and negative results uninterpretable. We introduce Attractor Domain Theory (ADT), which proves that the reconstructed attractor's information partitions into three mutually non-redundant domains: the Geometry Domain G (delay embedding; native capability: artifact rejection), the Ergodic Domain S (asymptotic statistical invariants; native capability: stability estimation), and the Variational Domain V (finite-time Lyapunov exponent field; native capability: hemodynamic inference). We prove a Domain Sufficiency Theorem (the Parseval analog for attractor information) and establish that three domains are necessary and sufficient. Geometry Domain validation via the SCSI framework across 176,742 PPG segments from four datasets yields AUC = 0.757 [0.686-0.828] and NPV = 0.966 after correcting three systematic evaluation artifacts (+0.179 net inflation). Ablation confirms C_NL as the dominant Geometry Domain component (Delta AUC = -0.413) and intra-domain redundancy across five components.