On the stability of scale-space metrics

Representational similarity analysis and related methods compare the internal geometries of neural networks, but they measure only alignment between spaces, leaving a blind spot -- whether a representation's structure is reliably recoverable, not merely similar. We introduce geometric stability, a distinct axis, and \textit{Shesha}, a metric that quantifies it from a single representation by correlating dissimilarity matrices built from complementary random halves of the feature dimensions. Unlike CKA and Procrustes distance, Shesha is provably non-invariant to orthogonal rotations of the feature basis. This is by design: the basis is privileged for learned models, since probes, patching, and steering act on coordinates, and a rotation-invariant metric cannot see whether the targeted structure survives them. A double dissociation isolates the mechanism -- removing the top principal component collapses CKA while Shesha holds, whereas rotating a representation into its eigenbasis, which preserves the spectrum and CKA exactly, collapses Shesha. Across 2,463 encoder configurations in seven domains, the metrics are redundant under geometry-preserving transforms and anti-correlate under compression ($ρ=-0.47$). Across 170 vision models spanning 6 clean and 38 corruption-shifted datasets, DINOv2 ranks first or second in transferability on three of six clean datasets yet bottom-quartile in stability on five, an isolated dissociation rather than a trade-off.

Assessing the quality of single image super-resolution (SISR) results remains an open methodological problem. Common full-reference metrics (PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS) do not explicitly evaluate the preservation of the geometric structure of images, which is critical for the correctness of scale-based reconstruction. In addition, they require the forced alignment of images to the same size (\textit{forced resizing}), which introduces an external interpolation error into the evaluation process. This paper proposes a diagnostic scale-invariant quality measure, MSIQ (\textit{Moment-based Scale-Invariant Quality}), based on the comparison of normalized central geometric moments of two images. MSIQ enables direct comparison of images with different spatial resolutions without resizing, is mathematically deterministic (\textit{model-free}), and has an analytical form. To provide a theoretical basis for the approach, we introduce a conceptual distinction between the ability of metrics to monotonically track degradation (\textit{tracking ability}) and their geometric selectivity (\textit{geometric specificity}). The experimental validation confirmed the stability of MSIQ under uniform scaling and, at the same time, revealed the high sensitivity of traditional metrics to the choice of interpolation method. The results show that MSIQ has pronounced geometric selectivity: the proposed measure effectively separates geometric deformations from non-geometric artifacts, in particular JPEG compression, unlike pixel-based and perceptual metrics. It is also shown that the response of MSIQ to structural perturbations remains stable across different classes of SR algorithms, including DNN models with different architectures. The proposed measure is a complementary diagnostic tool for domains where geometric fidelity has priority, in particular medical imaging and remote sensing.

Parametric projections let analysts embed new points in real time, but input variations from measurement noise or data drift can produce unpredictable shifts in the 2D layout. Whether and where a projection is locally stable remains largely unexamined. In this paper, we present a stability evaluation framework that probes parametric projections with Gaussian perturbations around selected anchor points and assesses how neighborhoods deform in the 2D embedding. Our approach combines quantitative measures of mean displacement, bias, and nearest-anchor assignment error with per-anchor visualizations of displacement vectors, local PCA ellipsoids, and Voronoi misassignment for detailed inspection. We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness on UMAP- and t-SNE-based neural projectors of varying network sizes and study the effect of Jacobian regularization as a gradient-based robustness strategy. We apply our framework to the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets. The results show that our framework identifies unstable projection regions invisible to reconstruction error or neighborhood-preservation metrics.