Organizations: Department of Artificial Intelligence, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea · School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA · Department of Electronic Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea
Abstract
Conventional machine-vision pipelines typically rely on high-quality optics that produce clean, human-interpretable images, and optical design has therefore been driven by image-level criteria such as resolution, aberration correction, and pixel fidelity. However, such optics are often impractical for size-, cost-, or form-factor-constrained applications, where compact meta-optics offer an attractive alternative but operate under strict physical efficiency limits. We propose CODA, a co-design framework that optimizes a continuous-density meta-optic front-end for frozen-model recognition using differentiable image formation and adjoint-gradient updates of Maxwell-based simulations. CODA directly optimizes the cross-entropy loss of a fixed zero-shot CLIP classifier without learned reconstruction, image signal processing, or image-fidelity auxiliary objectives. In a two-dimensional simulated imaging benchmark on ImageNet-100, CODA improves CLIP ViT-L/14 zero-shot accuracy from 53.75 ± 3.57% with a focal-concentration baseline to 65.41 ± 3.99%. The optimized optics further transfer without re-optimization across CLIP, SigLIP, and DINOv2 on ImageNet-100, CIFAR-100, and Food-101. These results demonstrate that, under constrained meta-optic imaging, downstream recognition can be improved by aligning optical design with frozen vision-model objectives rather than conventional image-formation criteria.
Automatic prompt optimization (APO) has been widely adopted to adapt vision-language models (VLMs) to downstream tasks without weight updates, yielding promising results. However, on multimodal tasks, the effectiveness of APO is fundamentally bottlenecked by a blind feedback channel: the optimizer reads the question, the prediction, and the gold answer, but never the input image on which the model failed, and therefore cannot diagnose visually grounded errors. As a remedy, we introduce Cross-Modal Visual Feedback (CMVF). CMVF incorporates (1) a failure-conditioned visual diagnosis stage, in which a stronger optimizer VLM inspects each failed image without access to predictions or labels, and (2) an error-aware aggregation stage that compresses these observations into reusable, task-level visual blind-spot patterns that drive the prompt rewrite. Crucially, the image is consumed only during optimization; the deployed artifact is an ordinary text prompt that runs at the same inference cost as any text-only baseline. Extensive results across 12 VQA datasets and 4 target VLMs demonstrate that CMVF consistently ranks first, improving over the strongest baseline on every target by 2.4 points on average, with gains of up to 6.5 points on individual benchmarks. Moreover, the optimizer self-organizes into expert-style visual checklists that transfer across models without re-optimization.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) achieve strong cross-modal performance, yet recent evidence suggests they over-rely on textual descriptions while under-utilizing visual evidence -- a phenomenon termed ``text shortcut learning.'' We propose an adversarial evaluation framework that quantifies this cross-modal dependency by measuring accuracy degradation (Drop) when semantically conflicting text is paired with unchanged images. Four adversarial strategies -- shape_swap, color_swap, position_swap, and random_text -- are applied to a controlled geometric-shapes dataset (n=1,000). We compare three configurations: Baseline CLIP (ViT-B/32), LoRA fine-tuning, and LoRA Optimized (integrating Hard Negative Mining, Label Smoothing, layer-wise learning rates, Cosine Restarts, curriculum learning, and data augmentation). The optimized model reduces average Drop from 27.5% to 9.8% (64.4% relative improvement, p<0.001) while maintaining 97% normal accuracy. Attention visualization and embedding-space analysis confirm that the optimized model attends more to visual features and achieves tighter cross-modal alignment.
Vision-language models such as CLIP embed images and text in a shared space, where modality-specific distributions often remain separated. Existing accounts connect this modality gap to initialization, contrastive dynamics, and information imbalance, while its distributional and pairwise contributions to retrieval remain unresolved. We introduce UOT-Gap, a training-free variational diagnostic that models frozen image and text embeddings with unbalanced entropic optimal transport (UOT). The UOT optimum separates transport, coupling complexity, and marginal mass variation; a complementary pair-aware residual compares observed image-caption pairs with the UOT soft matching. On Flickr8K and COCO-1K with frozen CLIP, OpenCLIP, and SigLIP encoders, caption degradation reduces Flickr8K Recall@1 from 0.559 to 0.003. Across six dataset-model conditions, the pair-aware residual tracks retrieval degradation with mean absolute Spearman 0.973, compared with 0.392 for the mean gap. The association remains stable across five random COCO-1K subsets at 0.954±0.026, with a minimum of 0.943. UOT barycentric updates reduce the transport objective while degrading retrieval, distinguishing geometric objective descent from task improvement. These results establish UOT-Gap as a diagnostic for caption quality, modality alignment, and retrieval robustness.