Benchmarking Geospatial Foundation Models for Agriculture Applications

Global food security and sustainable climate action increasingly rely on robust, scalable agricultural monitoring. Earth observation foundation models have emerged as powerful, label-efficient tools across general remote sensing domains, yet early attempts to deploy them for agricultural applications have yielded surprisingly poor results. We hypothesize that this performance gap stems from the extreme heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes and the inherent inability of current earth observation foundation models to adapt to task-specific nuances. In this work, we systematically evaluate two critical bottlenecks hindering the deployment of foundation models in agricultural tasks, benchmarking two earth observation foundation models, a foundation model designed for tabular data, and conventional supervised baselines across seven real-world agricultural datasets spanning yield prediction, phenology estimation, and crop classification. First, we identify a pretraining-deployment modality gap: agricultural downstream tasks frequently require diverse, non-imagery data modalities that earth observation foundation models are architecturally unequipped to ingest, while a foundation model built for tabular data handles this heterogeneity more naturally. Second, we formalize the agricultural task space across five structural axes to demonstrate why current models fail to generalize reliably, resulting in highly unstable model rankings across evaluation settings. By characterizing these structural and modal gaps, our insights highlight the friction between general-purpose architectures and specialized agricultural downstream data, providing a strategic roadmap for developing the next generation of domain-aware foundation models.

Geospatial foundation models provide reusable representations of satellite imagery that support downstream mapping with limited task-specific modelling. We evaluate whether annual AlphaEarth embeddings support binary cultivated-versus-non-cultivated mapping in Maine, USA, using 192 spatially separated patches and labels derived from the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL). Without fine-tuning the foundation model, a lightweight classifier reaches 93.7% overall accuracy and 90.8% balanced accuracy on held-out patches. Logistic regression is within 0.3 percentage points of a gradient-boosted ensemble, while a nearest-class-centroid rule, which uses class centroids but fits no parameters, reaches 90.2%. A balanced sample of 60,000 labelled pixels is within 1.3 percentage points of the full pool of 8.6 million pixels; because pixels are spatially autocorrelated, this result concerns pixel-sample efficiency rather than 60,000 independent annotation sites. In a same-region transfer experiment, classifiers trained in one year remain accurate across 2018 to 2023. Against a blind, two-interpreter consensus at 385 randomly sampled points in one contiguous 2023 block, the AlphaEarth-plus-random-forest map agrees at 95.3% ($κ=0.82$), compared with 91.7% for the CDL ($κ=0.72$; exact two-sided McNemar $p=0.0161$). This local result is consistent with partial smoothing of CDL label noise, but it does not establish statewide correction of the reference product. On the same points, the difference from a fine-tuned TerraMind segmentation model is not statistically significant (95.3% versus 93.5%; $p=0.14$), and the experiment is not a controlled comparison of computational cost. These results support frozen geospatial embeddings as a low-compute candidate for regional cropland mapping, subject to the limits of a single-state study, a 30 m-derived training reference, and a one-block human validation.

Geospatial foundation models have emerged as state-of-the-art methods for downstream Earth observation tasks. However, existing pretraining methodologies process imagery through a single-concept lens, failing to capture the highly compositional nature of complex satellite scenes. We propose a composition-aware pretraining framework that explicitly encodes fractional land-cover mixtures. Each satellite image cell is mapped to a histogram representing its fractional land-cover distribution, which we term the "composition target". These targets serve as the primary prediction objective and are distilled into the backbone using Earth Mover's Distance. Experimental evaluation shows that composition-aware pretraining yields substantial gains on region-level understanding tasks requiring semantic similarity judgment, including zero-shot image retrieval and scene classification, while remaining competitive on tasks requiring fine-grained spatial precision, such as segmentation and object detection. With a 36.8M-parameter backbone, our framework outperforms SatMAE and Prithvi-EO-2.0, which contain 303M and 600M parameters, respectively, in most retrieval and scene classification settings. On the fine-grained ForestNet-12 dataset, a rigorous testbed for compositional discrimination, our method boosts baseline mAP@10 from 0.279 to 0.434, a 55.6% relative improvement, providing direct evidence for the effectiveness of explicit composition modeling. The code implementation can be found at https://github.com/05kashyap/GFM_Composition_Pretraining