cs.DSJul 1, 2026

The Binary Tree Mechanism is Optimal for Approximate Differentially Private Continual Counting

Authors: Konstantina BairaktariKasper Green Larsen

Organizations: Department of Computer Science, Aarhus University.

Abstract

Private continual counting is a fundamental problem in differential privacy: given a binary stream of length nn, where each 11 corresponds to the contribution of one individual, the goal is to release all running counts while protecting the privacy of each individual. The standard algorithm is the binary tree mechanism, whose Gaussian-noise variant achieves expected \ell_\infty error proportional to log3/2n\log^{3/2} n for approximate differential privacy. Whether this dependence on the stream length is necessary has remained a central open problem. In this work, we resolve the dependence on nn by proving that every differentially private mechanism for continual counting must incur expected \ell_\infty error Ω(log3/2n)Ω(\log^{3/2} n). This shows that the binary tree mechanism is asymptotically optimal in the approximate-DP setting. As a consequence, we also obtain a largest-possible separation between hereditary discrepancy and private \ell_\infty error for linear queries, showing that the known general upper bound in terms of hereditary discrepancy has the optimal dependence on the number of queries.

Explore similar work

Jun 6, 2026cs.DS

Differentially Private Range Subgraph Counting

Subgraph counting is a fundamental problem in graph analysis. Motivated by practical scenarios where graph analytics are performed on subgraphs induced by selected vertices -- rather than on the entire graph -- and by growing privacy concerns, we initiate the study of differentially private range subgraph counting (DPRSC). The goal is to privately count occurrences of a fixed pattern graph within induced subgraphs defined by multi-dimensional attribute ranges. Unlike classical point counting, subgraph counting is inherently nonlinear and exhibits high sensitivity: a single edge modification can affect many subgraph occurrences. We present the first efficient algorithms for DPRSC with small additive error. Our approach introduces a subgraph projection that reduces DPRSC to weighted orthogonal range counting, enabling the use of range trees and local sensitivity estimation to achieve accurate private query answering. We complement our algorithms with matching lower bounds, obtained by reducing reconstruction attacks to DPRSC and leveraging discrepancy theory. In particular, we show that any differentially private algorithm for DPRSC must incur additive error exponential in the dimension. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that our algorithms significantly outperform baseline methods in accuracy and runtime while maintaining strong privacy guarantees.
Xian Chen, Ruobing Bai, Pan Peng
May 27, 2026cs.CR

Mind the Gap: Mixtures of Gaussians in Approximate Differential Privacy

We design a class of additive noise mechanisms that satisfy (ε,δ)(\varepsilon, δ)-differential privacy (DP) for scalar, real-valued query functions with known sensitivities, with a particular focus on moderate and low-privacy regimes. These mechanisms, which we call \textit{mixture mechanisms}, are constructed by mixing multiple Gaussian distributions that share the same variance but differ in their means and mixture weights. The resulting distributions can be interpreted as convex combinations of a zero-mean Gaussian (as used in the analytic Gaussian mechanism) and additional Gaussians whose means depend on the sensitivity of the query function. We derive tight conditions on the variances required for (ε,δ)(\varepsilon, δ)-DP and provide efficient algorithms to compute them. Compared to the analytic Gaussian mechanism, our mechanisms yield substantially lower expected noise amplitudes (l1l_1-loss) and variances (l2l_2-loss for zero-mean distributions). In the low-privacy regime that motivates our design, our mechanisms approach optimality, mitigating nearly all of the optimality gap of the analytic Gaussian mechanism.
Huikang Liu, Aras Selvi, Wolfram Wiesemann
May 13, 2026cs.CR

Limits of Personalizing Differential Privacy Budgets

A key technical difficulty in differential privacy is selecting a privacy budget that satisfies privacy requirements while maximizing utility. A natural and well-studied workaround is to use personalized privacy budgets, which may differ across agents. In this paper, we show that personalized budgets come with major limitations and that for mean estimation, the dominant factor is not full personalization, but rather choosing the right effective privacy budget. This can be achieved through a simple thresholding operator that we describe. Compared with this thresholding baseline, the gains obtained by fully personalized mechanisms are limited. In particular, we precisely quantify the constant-factor improvement in settings with mixed private and public datasets and in private datasets with two levels of privacy requirements. We also establish upper bounds and identify regimes of maximal gain for arbitrary privacy requirements.
Edwige Cyffers, Juba Ziani