Agentic generation of verifiable rules for deterministic, self-expanding reaction classification

Large language models (LLMs) are beginning to reshape how organic-synthesis workflows are represented, queried, planned, and connected to experimental automation. Assessing their contribution is not straightforward because reaction-specific transformers, chemistry-adapted LLMs, tool-using agents, optimizers, and autonomous laboratories are often discussed under the same broad terminology despite operating at different levels of the synthesis workflow. This Review traces the progression from reaction prediction and retrosynthetic planning to reaction development, literature-to-protocol translation, and robotic execution, with representative numerical claims verified against primary sources available through 4 September 2026. We examine where language models provide genuine added value, where established specialist methods remain the principal source of performance, and how retrieval, uncertainty-aware optimization, deterministic chemistry tools, robotics, sensing, and human oversight alter system behavior. The evidence shows a clear transition from isolated language-model demonstrations toward modular scientific systems that combine broad language priors with specialized computation and experimentally grounded feedback. Emerging work on multimodal reaction understanding, standardized tool interoperability, provenance-aware execution, and programmable laboratory infrastructure extends this transition further. Despite this progress, reliable deployment continues to depend on generalization beyond historical reaction corpora, calibrated uncertainty, transparent component attribution, safety controls, reproducible system state, and prospective experimental validation.

Synthesis planning seeks an efficient sequence of chemical reactions that produce a target molecule. Typically, a pretrained single-step (autoregressive) retrosynthesis model is repeatedly invoked to generate such a sequence. Classifier guidance can, in principle, help steer the output of single-step model toward reactions that satisfy specific constraints or accommodate chemist's preferences during inference without having to retrain the autoregressive generator. We expose the insufficiency of auxiliary classifiers trained with cross-entropy loss to override the unconditional token-level distributions learned from typical sparse single-disconnection reaction datasets. We overcome this issue with a novel method called Sequence Completion Ranking (SCR), which employs contrastive argumentation and a margin-based loss to calibrate the classifier so that it can meaningfully discriminate between continuations during decoding. We formally establish that margin-calibrated classifiers can expand the set of property-satisfying sequences reachable under guided beam search. Empirically, on USPTO-190, given chemist-specified guidance targets, SCR substantially improves multi-step solve rates from $16.8\%$ (unguided generator) to $78.4\%$ with reaction-type guidance and $95.3\%$ with Tanimoto guidance, unlocking valid routes for 33 targets ($17.4\%$) previously unsolvable with baselines. Our method also effectively closes the long-standing diversity gap between template-free and template-based methods.

The total synthesis of a complex molecule is among the most demanding intellectual and experimental feats in chemistry: a chemist must plan many steps ahead for how to assemble simple building blocks into an intricate target, devise backup strategies, and anticipate procedural challenges. It is also a profoundly creative activity. For half a century, efforts to automate the retrosynthetic design of natural products and other complex molecules have drawn on catalogued reactions, and the resulting tools now report near-complete success on benchmarks built from that same source. But these tools were shaped to fit benchmarked chemistry, and they falter on many natural products, the frontier of the field, whose densely functionalized, polycyclic architectures demand precisely the inventive chemistry the record contains least. Whether a machine could reasonably design such syntheses like an expert chemist does has remained unclear. Here, we show that SynthEx, an agentic framework built on large language models, plans routes to complex natural products that lie beyond the reach of conventional design algorithms. SynthEx proposes competing strategies, assembles a sequence of routine and key steps into a cohesive route, and critiques and improves its own design; the chemistry it favours is more convergent than existing tools produce, and spans a region of reaction space that catalogue-based tools cannot match. Most notably, in blinded assessments, expert chemists judged its key steps comparable to those of published human syntheses and engaged with them as genuine synthesis plans, a response algorithmic route prediction has not previously accomplished. We release routes to more than a thousand natural products as SynthAtlas, an open, interactive database, and anticipate it will become a shared resource for a collection of complex target molecules that lack existing literature routes.