cs.ROJul 1, 2026

The Three Dimensions of ROS 2 Middleware

Authors: Sanghoon Lee, Taehun Kim, Angelo Corsaro, Kyung-Joon Park

Abstract

ROS 2 (Robot Operating System 2) has emerged as the de facto standard for modern robot software development, with middleware implementations such as the Data Distribution Service (DDS) and Zenoh forming the core infrastructure for distributed robotic communication. Despite their architectural flexibility, these middleware systems exhibit structural limitations, particularly under dynamic and resource-constrained wireless environments. This paper presents a systematic survey of ROS 2 middleware and introduces a conceptual framework to examine its architectural limits through three structural dimensions required by distributed robotic systems, namely Space, Time, and State. We first provide a structured analysis of middleware architecture and operational dynamics, including discovery, data exchange, and state management mechanisms. Building on this foundation, we formalize Time as temporal predictability for control loops, Space as spatial abstraction from physical topology to enable modular deployment, and State as contextual continuity despite dynamic node participation and intermittent connectivity. Through a comprehensive review of existing implementations and prior studies, we organize middleware research according to the structural trade-offs that arise among these dimensions. Under constrained wireless conditions, spatial abstraction can obscure network variability and weaken temporal guarantees, while mechanisms that preserve state continuity introduce computational and network overhead that competes with time-critical communication. These interactions reveal structural trade-offs that characterize the practical limits of contemporary robot middleware. By synthesizing architectural patterns and identifying gaps in current modeling and analysis approaches, this survey outlines a principled research roadmap for robust and scalable robotic middleware architectures.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jun 9, 2026cs.RO

ros2probe: Non-intrusive, Kernel-selective Observability for Robot Operating System 2 Middleware

Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2), the de facto standard middleware framework for robots, runs each robot as a graph of nodes communicating over the Data Distribution Service (DDS), a publish/subscribe substrate. Observing this inter-node communication in real time is essential to robot development, yet it has a price. A tool can receive data only by joining the DDS domain as a subscriber that discovery has matched to the publisher, so observing folds the tool into the system it measures and perturbs it. We define this protocol-inherent perturbation as the observer's probe effect. It inflates the discovery plane, adds deserialization cost on the observer, makes the loss it reports diverge from what the subscriber actually received, and near saturation displaces the subscriber's messages. The only escape, capturing all wire traffic passively, discards ROS 2 message semantics and scales with total traffic, not what is observed. We present ros2probe, a non-intrusive observation framework that removes the probe effect. It reconstructs the full ROS 2 communication state from the domain's discovery packets at no bandwidth cost, then drives an in-kernel filter restricted to the topics the user asks for, lifting only those packets at minimal cost and observing what the real subscriber receives. Its interfaces and recordings match the standard ROS 2 tools. Across three hardware platforms (laptop, Jetson, and Raspberry Pi), two DDS implementations, and seven robot-operation workloads, ros2probe holds the discovery graph within 0.5% of an unobserved system, whereas domain-joining tools inflate discovery up to 2.6×\times and drop 38.5% of the subscriber's messages at saturation while ros2probe drops none. It reports loss with a recall of 1.0, cuts observer CPU and memory by up to 7×\times and 28×\times, and stays practical on the embedded robots where existing tools overload the system.
Jisang Yu, Sanghoon Lee, Yeonwoo Choi +1
Partial ObservabilityRobotsWorkloadCentral Processing Units
AskPDF
Jun 21, 2026cs.RO

Integrated cloud-based architecture for robot-robot and human-robot collaboration using ROS 2--MQTT in Mediterranean Greenhouses

The imperative to develop more sustainable agriculture demands a transition from isolated automation toward the deployment of multi-robot systems (MRS) in agrifood environments. However, Mediterranean greenhouse settings-characterized by narrow corridors, dense biomass, and structural metallic interference-pose significant challenges for robust and scalable communication between agents. Traditional robotic frameworks, such as ROS 2, frequently encounter node discovery issues and latency spikes due to dynamic obstacles, dense foliage, and other characteristic greenhouse elements, creating a critical bottleneck for real-time coordination. This paper proposes an innovative cloud-based hybrid architecture that establishes a two-way communication bridge between ROS 2, acting as an edge computing platform, and iVeg as a Decision Support System (DSS), using MQTT and the European FIWARE platform. The proposed framework enables seamless interoperability between fleets of multiple robots in environments with communication constraints, facilitating the synchronised exchange of high-level telemetry, point cloud data and farmer identification for collaboration, amongst other critical data. The architecture was validated in a high-fidelity simulation environment and subsequently tested in a real-world greenhouse scenario, demonstrating its ability to maintain persistent connectivity and data integrity under adverse network conditions. The results indicate that the integration of MQTT effectively eliminates information silos, providing a scalable and decentralised solution for managing complex robotic missions, which are executed locally via Edge Computing. This work sets a new methodological precedent for the concept of Greenhouse Models as a Service (GMaaS), bridging the gap between low-level robotic control and high-level, cloud-based IoT decision-making.
F. Cañadas-Aránega, M. Muñoz, J. C. Moreno +1
Multi-Robot SystemsMediterranean GreenhousesHuman-Robot CollaborationEdge Computing
AskPDF
Jun 8, 2026cs.RO

Harness Engineering for Physical AI: Robot Middleware Is the Harness Layer

Robot middleware faces a new role in the era of Physical AI. Learned policies, planners, and vision-language-action (VLA) models now enter deployed robots as causal participants on the control path, but the layer that integrates them with timing, scheduling, and network has not been named. Recent language-agent work names this layer the harness, the external system that mediates tools, manages state, bounds resources, and records execution. The robotics community has not yet adopted this framing, and we propose that robot middleware is that harness. A Physical AI harness differs from a software harness in where it intervenes. A software harness mediates at tool-call boundaries. A Physical AI harness must mediate at control, computing, and communication simultaneously, because a learned policy's output crosses all three: its commands shift the trajectory, its inference time shifts the schedule, and its payload shifts the bandwidth. Robot middleware is the lowest robot-stack layer with mediating abstractions over all three, so it is best positioned to compose their enforcement. It already provides most of what a harness needs but lacks the enforcement for an AI model. We name this missing enforcement as three functions: Projection gates each output at emission, Isolation bounds the model's execution and transmission slot, and Transfer falls back to a verified baseline when checks fail. Each appears today as hand-built application code in deployed robot systems, built on surfaces robot middleware already provides. Robot middleware should host them not as the best single-axis enforcer but as the layer that composes all three. We sketch this as a ROS 2 Harness Profile, a deployment artifact that carries an AI model's declared output region, inference budget, and operating regime while the middleware enforces them across ROS 2, DDS, and Zenoh.
Sanghoon Lee, Jiyeong Chae, Kyung-Joon Park
Agent HarnessRobotsArtificial Intelligence SystemsArtificial Intelligence Models
AskPDF