The risk of KV cache compression

KV cache eviction methods typically use a single retention-rule family throughout a model, making eviction-method identity a model-level design choice. Yet Transformer layers differ substantially in their attention behavior, representations, and sensitivity to compression, suggesting that a uniform rule may overlook useful layer-wise structure. This raises a basic question: should eviction methods themselves vary across layers? We investigate this question by composing existing eviction methods across Transformer layers and systematically exploring the resulting layer-wise design space. Using simple offline profiles, we construct fixed routes and study how their quality varies with method placement and cache budget. On LongBench, heterogeneous routing improves performance on a majority of tasks over homogeneous policies at the same cache budget. Even when method counts are held fixed, the profile-guided placement ranks second among 100 evaluated assignments, demonstrating that routing quality depends strongly on where methods are placed. Moreover, the same fixed route outperforms the best of nine standalone baselines across all five tested cache budgets. Together, these results establish layer-wise method composition as an exploitable, placement-sensitive design dimension for KV cache compression.

The key-value (KV) cache is the dominant memory bottleneck during Transformer inference, yet little is known theoretically about how aggressively it can be compressed before multi-step reasoning degrades. We study this through $k$-hop pointer chasing on $n$ tokens under a shared KV cache of size $s$, attention dimension $m$, $H$ heads, $p$-bit precision, and a locality-respecting cache controller (satisfied by all standard KV-compression methods). We give three results. (1) Product depth lower bound (conjectured). We conjecture that any such Transformer ($n \geq 4k$, $s \leq \sqrt{n}/4$) requires depth $L = Ω(\lceil k/s \rceil \cdot \lceil \log_2 n/(Hmp) \rceil)$, and isolate the sole remaining gap as a probabilistic step on the joint distribution of cache trace and pointer chain. Unconditionally, we prove a matching upper bound $L = O(\min(k, \lceil k/s \rceil \log s) \cdot \log n/(mp))$ via windowed pointer doubling, and a max-bound $L = Ω(\max(\lceil k/s \rceil, \log n/(Hmp)))$. Closing the conjecture amounts to upgrading max to product. (2) Bandwidth barrier. The product bound binds only when $Hmp \lesssim \log n$. Any lower bound provable via per-window distinguishability counting -- including reachability, bandwidth, and combinations -- cannot exceed $\lceil k/s \rceil$ once $Hmp \geq \log_2 n$. Breaking this requires lifting unconditional communication-complexity bounds for pointer chasing to Cache-Transformer depth. (3) Adaptive vs oblivious error scaling. Under random cache over $T = \lceil \log_2 k \rceil$ doubling stages, oblivious caches give $\Pr[\mathcal{E}] \leq (s/(n-T))^T + 2T^3/n$ (exponential in $T$), while adaptive locality-respecting caches achieve $\Pr[\mathcal{E}] = s/n$ exactly, independent of $T$. The $Ω((n/s)^{T-1})$ separation explains why heavy-hitter eviction empirically dominates random eviction for multi-hop reasoning.

Long-context inference in Large Language Models (LLMs) is bottlenecked by the linear growth of Key-Value (KV) cache memory. Existing KV cache compression paradigms are fundamentally limited by heuristics: heuristic budgeting relies on statistical priors rather than task objectives, causing resource misallocation, while heuristic selection relies on coupled query-key interactions or static inductive biases (e.g., attention sinks). To address this limitation, we introduce LKV (Learned KV Eviction), which formulates KV compression as an end-to-end differentiable optimization problem. LKV integrates LKV-H to learn task-optimized global budgets, and LKV-T to derive intrinsic KV importance without materializing attention matrices. This design bypasses heuristic proxies, strictly aligning compression with task objectives. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that LKV achieves state-of-the-art performance on both LongBench and RULER benchmarks at high compression rates. In particular, on LongBench, LKV achieves near-lossless performance with only 15% KV cache retention. Crucially, our analysis identifies learned budgeting as the dominant driver of fidelity, demonstrating that data-driven allocation is essential to overcome the limitations of hand-crafted heuristics.