Room embeddings derived from reverberant speech are often unreliable: speech content and recording degradation can alter the representation even when speaker, room, and source-receiver geometry remain unchanged, degrading downstream task performance. We propose a framework that learns room embeddings robust to speech-content variation and a representation-level uncertainty score from reverberant speech without downstream-task supervision. The embedding is anchored to a structured room impulse response (RIR) latent space and trained using a multi-view data structure with Kullback-Leibler (KL)-based alignment; a multi-positive contrastive term further refines robustness. A lightweight uncertainty head is calibrated using the dispersion of corruption-induced embeddings and optimized with a rank-based objective. Across waveform- and spectrogram-level corruptions, the score is consistent with representation dispersion and enables effective selective prediction while requiring only a single utterance at inference.
Speaker embeddings aggregate frame-level acoustic features into compact representations for speaker recognition. Recent uncertainty-aware speaker modeling approaches further characterize the reliability of speaker embeddings by estimating their associated uncertainty. However, existing methods often suffer from inaccurate uncertainty estimation and uncertainty miscalibration under domain shifts. To address these challenges, we propose a robust uncertainty modeling framework from both estimation and adaptation perspectives. Specifically, we introduce an Inter- and Intra-Speaker-Aware Uncertainty Softmax that incorporates both inter-speaker separability and intra-speaker variability into uncertainty learning, enabling uncertainty estimates to better capture the reliability of speaker embeddings. Furthermore, we propose an Uncertainty-Calibrated Domain Adaptation (UCDA) framework to mitigate uncertainty miscalibration caused by domain mismatch. Extensive experiments on both in-domain and cross-domain benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently improves uncertainty reliability and speaker recognition robustness.
Speaker verification back-ends commonly combine similarity scoring, score normalization, and calibration. However, speaker embeddings extracted from real-world utterances have trial-dependent reliability because of factors such as duration, noise, and channel variation. Existing uncertainty-aware methods primarily improve the speaker encoder or the initial similarity score, while the estimated uncertainty is typically not propagated through subsequent normalization and calibration. We represent each utterance by a speaker embedding, interpreted as a posterior mean, together with its covariance as an uncertainty estimate. We present a unified uncertainty-aware back-end comprising uncertainty-aware cosine scoring, uncertainty-aware AS-Norm (UAS-Norm), and uncertainty-aware Quality Measure Function calibration (UQMF). Covariance information is incorporated throughout this pipeline to adjust score scaling, cohort statistics, normalized-score combination, and calibration features. Experiments with ECAPA-TDNN and ResNet show consistent EER reductions and improved target--non-target separation across both architectures.
Non-speech interference can change a speech representation without causing comparable task loss. We test eight frozen encoders on four tasks, adding non-speech sounds throughout recordings, during speech, or in pauses. Under whole-recording interference, embedding drift tracks task loss across seven sounds, with mean Spearman correlations of 0.81-0.88. Moving the same sound between speech and pauses changes this pattern. At quiet to moderate levels, pause interference produces larger drift, while speech interference usually causes greater loss on intent recognition, speaker verification and speech recognition. Emotion recognition shows a weaker placement effect. Pause interference also changes speech-frame representations beyond the injected region. Even below the estimated recording background, interference can change embeddings as much as repeated speech takes do. Drift helps rank the effects of different sounds, but larger drift does not consistently indicate greater task loss.