Dynamic Regret for Non-Stationary Linear Bandits via Misspecification Reductions

We study linear contextual bandits under rare parameter updates: the learner may incorporate reward feedback into its parameter estimate only at a small number of update times, while still observing contexts online and selecting actions sequentially. This viewpoint clarifies a practical distinction that is often blurred in the literature: many "strictly batched" methods additionally restrict within-interval context adaptivity, meaning that the action rule inside an interval cannot depend on the sequence of realized contexts/actions in that interval (beyond the current round's context). For linear contextual bandits, we propose two practical algorithms with only $O(\log\log T)$ parameter updates. Our first algorithm BLCE-G attains minimax-optimal regret (up to polylogarithmic factors in $T$) simultaneously in both the small-$K$ and large-$K$ regimes under a static schedule. Our second algorithm BLCE removes the near G-optimal design step -- a dominant computational bottleneck in prior strictly batched static-grid methods -- yet preserves minimax-optimal regret and achieves the lowest known runtime complexity among optimal algorithms. We further extend these rare-update and computational principles to generalized linear contextual bandits. Overall, our results yield statistically optimal algorithms under $O(\log\log T)$ parameter updates that are also computationally efficient in practice.

We consider a variant of the linear contextual stochastic multi-armed bandits, where the learner must provide recommendations to a group of users, each having its personalized preference vector, and in the presence of context distributions that are drifting over time. Under practitioner-friendly assumptions, we reduce this setting to linear bandit with stationary mean but heteroskedastic and non-stationary noise. We further study the case when the learner must ensure the mean reward of each decision must exceed that of a baseline strategy $\boldsymbolπ_0$ at each decision step. We introduce Dri-MED, an algorithm inspired from the linear version of the MED strategy, and carefully adapted to handle the non-stationary heteroskedastic noise. We show that the instance-dependent regret scales as $\tilde{\mathcal O}\left(\fracκ{\tildeΔ}d^2(\log(T)\right)$, where $\tildeΔ$ is the constraint-aware sub-optimality gap subject to policy $π_0$, with variance-aware multiplicative term $κ$ that we carefully handle using heteroskedastic regression. We further show Dri-MED enjoys $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d)$ expected constraint violations. Our numerical results suggest that Dri-MED significantly outperforms conservative baselines that ignores the drift and preference structure.

We study non-stationary linear contextual bandits where the reward model drifts over time, rendering classical contextual bandit algorithms brittle because historical data becomes systematically biased. We propose Flow-Corrected Thompson Sampling (fcTS), a Bayesian method that reuses experience by transporting past rewards to the present using an explicit drift model and incorporating each transported observation with a confidence weight that reflects transport reliability. This yields a unified template that specializes in (i) linear parameter drift via online slope estimation and reward correction, (ii) periodic variation via phase-aware reuse across cycles, and (iii) recurring regime switches via changepoint detection and regime-specific posterior memory. The resulting posterior updates remain closed-form under a linear Gaussian model and can be implemented efficiently with truncated, incrementally updated sufficient statistics. Across five controlled case studies and a semi-synthetic portfolio-selection benchmark with multiple overlapping non-stationarities, fcTS outperforms standard forgetting-based baselines (discounting, sliding windows, and periodic restarts), with the largest gains in settings exhibiting recurring temporal structure. These results demonstrate that when non-stationarity is structured, correcting and reweighting historical observations can be substantially more sample-efficient than uniformly discarding them.