Open Problem: Is Interaction Necessary for Order-Optimal 1-bit Mean Estimation?

This paper is concerned with one-bit mean estimation, where each independent sample is represented by a single binary message. We consider distributions on $\mathbb{R}$ with mean in $[-λ,λ]$ and absolute $k$-th central moment at most $σ^k$, where $k>1$ is fixed. For this class, previous work attained the optimal sample complexity for general queries using a two-stage protocol. The first stage localizes the mean. The second-stage queries are chosen after localization and refine the estimate around the decoded center. We show that this interaction can be avoided by constructing a randomized fully non-adaptive protocol that fixes all queries before observing the data and matches the optimal adaptive sample complexity. For target accuracy $ε$ and confidence $1-δ$, its sample complexity scales as $$\log\fracλσ + \begin{cases} (σ/ε)^2\log(1/δ), & k>2,\\ (σ/ε)^2\log(σ/ε)\log(1/δ), & k=2,\\ (σ/ε)^{k/(k-1)}\log(1/δ), & 1<k<2, \end{cases}$$ up to constants depending only on $k$. In the range covered by the known lower bound, this rate is minimax optimal even among fully adaptive protocols. This gives a negative answer to the COLT 2026 open problem asking whether interaction is necessary for order-optimal one-bit mean estimation with general queries \citep[Open Problem~1]{lau2026open}.

We study distributed one-dimensional mean estimation under a 1-bit communication constraint. Each agent observes one sample, drawn independently from an unknown distribution, and returns a single bit in response to a query $Q: \mathbb{R}\to\{0,1\}$ chosen by a central learner. The distribution has mean in $[-λ,λ]$ and $k$-th central moment at most $σ^k$, for a fixed $k>1$. The order-optimal two-stage protocol of Lau and Scarlett uses responses from the first batch to choose the second-batch queries, motivating the question of whether this single round of interaction is necessary. We answer this negatively: for every $k>1$, a non-adaptive protocol attains the adaptive 1-bit minimax rate (and concurrent works reached the same conclusion via different strategies). We further determine the minimax sample complexity among non-adaptive 1-bit estimators when every one-set $Q^{-1}(1)$ is restricted to a union of at most $s$ intervals. Relative to unrestricted non-adaptive 1-bit querying, this constraint adds a term of order $(λσ/(s\varepsilon^2))\log(1/δ)$, giving the full tradeoff between sample complexity and interval complexity to within $k$-dependent constant factors. As a corollary, we identify, order-wise, the minimum interval budget needed to retain the unrestricted 1-bit minimax sample rate.

Low-precision pretraining (FP8, MXFP4, NVFP4) is now standard for frontier language models, yet the literature is almost entirely achievability -- algorithms and empirical scaling laws -- with no matching characterization of what is information-theoretically possible. We study a B-bit quantized stochastic first-order oracle: an optimizer interacts for T rounds and receives, each round, a B-bit adaptive public-coin description of its stochastic gradient. Our main contribution is an exact reduction from optimizing a strongly convex quadratic family to interactively compressed Gaussian mean estimation -- under the B-bit oracle the query carries no information, so optimization collapses exactly onto a sequential distributed-estimation problem. This yields two unconditional lower bounds, a communication bound TB = Omega(d) and a statistical bound T = Omega(sigma^2 d / eps^2), and the sharp product-form bound T = Omega((sigma^2 d / eps^2) max{1, d/B}). The product form is also unconditional: a B-bit transcript carries at most O(TB / sigma^2) of Fisher trace about the mean, so bits rather than dimension limit the recoverable information, and combined with the multivariate van Trees inequality this gives the bound directly, without bounded-likelihood-ratio truncation. We give a near-matching achievability result with exact per-round bit accounting under a bounded-dynamic-range oracle, tight up to a logarithmic factor; the lower bound is for truly Gaussian (unbounded) gradients, and closing this oracle gap is left open. A sequential rate-distortion perspective extends the reduction to correlated and drifting oracles and corrects an earlier conjecture: positive noise correlation raises the bound by (1+rho)/(1-rho) rather than relaxing it. The bounds give an information-theoretic baseline for any low-bit gradient path, not an optimality claim about deployed FP4 systems.