cs.LGJul 3, 2026

Do ECG Foundation Models Transfer to Rare Cardiac Diseases? Evidence from Brugada Syndrome Detection

Authors: Beatrice Zanchi, Giuliana Monachino, Alvise Dei Rossi, Luigi Fiorillo, Georgia Sarquella-Brugada, Giulio Conte, Francesca Dalia Faraci

Abstract

Background: Foundation models (FMs) trained on large-scale unlabeled physiological data have emerged as a promising paradigm for medical artificial intelligence. Their ability to capture clinically meaningful, transferable representations for rare diseases remains largely unproven. This study investigates whether FM pre-training provides genuine clinical generalization benefits beyond improved optimization for rare electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotypes. Methods: We systematically evaluated nine publicly available ECG FMs for Brugada syndrome detection on the BrSwiss cohort (294 patients, 87 cases) and the independent external HUCA cohort (363 patients, 76 cases), under three strategies (from-scratch training, linear probing, full fine-tuning) across several configurations, including a 3% data ablation and zero-shot cross-site transfers. Results: Pre-training was necessary for high-capacity architectures unable to converge from scratch (AUC gain up to 0.411, p < 0.05), but gave no significant gain for compact architectures already converged on labeled data alone. On full BrSwiss, the best fine-tuned FM (ECG-CPC, AUC = 0.962) only marginally exceeded the strongest supervised baseline (ECG-CPC from scratch, AUC = 0.932; p = 0.091). At matched training-set size, the data-efficiency advantage on BrSwiss-3% (AUC gain = 0.055, p < 0.01) did not replicate on HUCA. Under zero-shot cross-site transfer, FM-based pipelines did not generalize better than supervised baselines, all approaching chance-level performance. Conclusion: For Brugada syndrome detection, FM pre-training is mechanical rather than semantic, providing optimization stability rather than transferable clinical knowledge. These findings challenge the assumption that large-scale pre-training inherently encodes clinically meaningful representations, highlighting the central role of model architecture and data-domain alignment.

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 12, 2026eess.SP

Pretraining Strategies and Scaling for ECG Foundation Models: A Systematic Study

Specialized foundation models are beginning to emerge in various medical subdomains, but pretraining methodologies and parametric scaling with the size of the pretraining dataset are rarely assessed systematically and in a like-for-like manner. This work focuses on foundation models for electrocardiography (ECG) data, one of the most widely captured physiological time series world-wide. We present a comprehensive assessment of pretraining methodologies, covering five different contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learning objectives for ECG foundation models, and investigate their scaling behavior with pretraining dataset sizes up to 11M input samples, exclusively from publicly available sources. Pretraining strategy has a meaningful and consistent impact on downstream performance, with contrastive predictive coding (slightly ahead of JEPA) yielding the most transferable representations across diverse clinical tasks. Scaling pretraining data continues to yield meaningful improvements up to 11M samples for most objectives. We also compare model architectures across all pretraining methodologies and find evidence for a clear superiority of structured state space models compared to transformers and CNN models. We hypothesize that the strong inductive biases of structured state space models, rather than pretraining scale alone, are the primary driver of effective ECG representation learning, with important implications for future foundation model development in this and potentially other physiological signal domains.
M A Al-Masud, Nils Strodthoff
Electroencephalography Foundation ModelsElectrocardiogramElectronic Health Record Foundation ModelsPhysiological SignalsPredictive CodingScaling+1
AskPDF
Apr 25, 2026cs.LG

Domain-Adapted Fine-Tuning of ECG Foundation Models for Multi-Label Structural Heart Disease Screening

Transthoracic echocardiography is the reference standard for confirming structural heart disease (SHD), but first-line screening is limited by cost, workflow burden, and specialist availability. We evaluated whether open pretrained electrocardiogram (ECG) foundation models can support echo-confirmed multi-label SHD detection using the public EchoNext Mini-Model benchmark. Six echocardiography-derived abnormalities were targeted: reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, increased left ventricular wall thickness, aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and right ventricular systolic dysfunction. Under a common pipeline, we compared engineered ECG features with gradient boosting, end-to-end waveform learning from scratch, and transfer from open ECG foundation models. We then applied in-domain self-supervised adaptation of an ECG foundation model (ECG-FM) on EchoNext waveforms followed by selective supervised fine-tuning, and evaluated trade-offs between discrimination and adaptation cost. Adapted ECG-FM models achieved the best overall performance: peak macro-AUROC 0.8509 and macro-AUPRC 0.4297, while a parameter-efficient operating point preserved AUROC (0.8501) and attained the highest fixed-threshold macro-F1 0.3691. Late fusion with covariates did not improve threshold-independent discrimination, and evaluated LoRA, alternative backbones, and mixture-of-foundations strategies did not surpass the best adapted single-backbone models. These results indicate that for ECG-based case finding and echocardiography triage, combining target-domain self-supervised adaptation with selective supervised updating of a pretrained ECG backbone is the most effective transfer strategy.
Duc N. Do, Minh N. Do, Dang Nguyen +14
EchocardiographyElectrocardiogramElectronic Health Record Foundation ModelsDomain Adaptation
AskPDF
May 17, 2026cs.LG

How Do Electrocardiogram Models Scale?

While scaling laws have established a fundamental framework for foundation models in natural language processing, their applicability to electrocardiogram (ECG) models remains poorly characterized. Indeed, recent studies do not always yield consistent downstream gains as one increases the model size or pre-training dataset size of ECG models, leaving the exact roles of architectural inductive biases, pre-training paradigms, and expected improvements with size largely unanswered. In this work, we systematically investigate neural and loss-to-loss scaling laws within the ECG domain. By pre-training over 120120 models (ranging from 2020K to 200200M parameters) on the large-scale CODE dataset (2.32.3M records), we decouple the effects of model architecture (ResNet vs. Transformer) and pre-training paradigm, namely supervised learning (SL) versus self-supervised learning (SSL). We found that (i) SL models are data-bottlenecked in-distribution, whereas SSL models scale robustly across both model and data sizes; (ii) for out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, ResNets are 1.31.3 to 2.52.5 times more parameter-efficient than Transformers, while SSL is up to 1616 times more data-efficient and achieves up to 7.67.6 times higher transfer efficiency than SL on unseen clinical tasks; (iii) across the observed scales, ResNet-based models generally achieve the lowest OOD loss, with SSL dominating on unseen clinical tasks and self-supervised Transformers overtaking at very large model sizes. Our results suggest that the path to effective ECG foundation models lies in the strategic alignment of architecture and paradigm rather than brute-force scaling.
Jiawei Li, Fabio Bonassi, Ming Jin +4
ElectrocardiogramElectroencephalography Foundation ModelsElectronic Health Record Foundation ModelsModel PretrainingScalingArchitectural Inductive Biases
AskPDF