Transition Information Density: Morphological Trajectories, Synesthetic Perception, and Structured Interpolation in Neural Training (or: The Synesthetic AI)

The analysis of neural representation has become an integral part of research aiming to better understand the inner workings of neural networks. While there are many different approaches to investigate neural representations, an important line of research has focused on doing so through the lens of intrinsic dimensions (IDs). Although this perspective has provided valuable insights and stimulated substantial follow-up research, important limitations of this approach have remained largely unaddressed. In this paper, we highlight a crucial discrepancy between theory and practice of IDs in neural representations, theoretically and empirically showing that common ID estimators are, in fact, not tracking the true underlying ID of the representation. We contrast this negative result with an investigation of the underlying factors that may drive commonly reported ID-related results on neural representation in the literature. Building on these insights, we offer a new perspective on ID estimation in neural representations.

Understanding how transformer representations evolve across layers, not merely what they encode, remains an open problem in mechanistic interpretability. We recast the transformer forward pass as a discrete population trajectory through a high-dimensional representation manifold, drawing on geometric tools from computational neuroscience. Rather than probing for pre-specified features, we characterize trajectory geometry using five metrics computed directly in the ambient space: trajectory length, curvature, a semantic convergence index, layerwise cosine similarity, and representational stability. Across three model families (GPT-2, TinyLlama, Qwen2.5) and five controlled prompt families, we report four findings. First, semantically related prompts converge significantly in middle-to-late layers (peak CI 0.41--0.58, p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U), consistent with attractor-like dynamics. Second, reasoning tasks produce trajectories of greater curvature than lexical variations (0.71--0.83 rad vs. 0.27--0.31 rad), suggesting curvature encodes computational complexity. Third, ambiguous tokens exhibit trajectory bifurcation with up to 5.6x representational separation by the final layer, absent in unambiguous controls. Fourth, layerwise cosine similarity reveals a universal three-phase structure: encoding, elaboration, and output preparation, consistent across all three architectures. All four effects vanish under shuffled-layer and random-embedding controls. We release a fully open-source, model-agnostic pipeline and argue that trajectory geometry constitutes a principled, probe-free lens for mechanistic interpretability.

Grokking describes a delayed generalization phenomenon in which a neural network achieves perfect training accuracy long before validation accuracy improves, followed by an abrupt transition to strong generalization. Existing detection signals are indirect: weight norm reflects parameter-space regularization and consistently lags the transition, while GrokFast's slow gradient EMA, used without gradient amplification, is unstable across seeds with standard deviation exceeding mean lead time. We propose the Inter/Intra-class Distance Ratio (ILDR), a geometric metric computed on second-to-last layer representations as the ratio of inter-class centroid separation to intra-class scatter. ILDR provides an early detection signal: it rises and crosses a threshold at 2.5 times its baseline before the grokking transition appears in validation accuracy, indicating early geometric reorganization in representation space. Grounded in Fisher's linear discriminant criterion, ILDR requires no eigendecomposition and runs in O(|C|^2 + N). It is evaluated exclusively on held-out data, making it robust to memorization effects. Across modular arithmetic and permutation group composition (S5), ILDR leads the grokking transition by 9 to 73 percent of the training budget, with lead time increasing with task algebraic complexity. Over eight random seeds, ILDR leads by 950 +/- 250 steps with a coefficient of variation of 26 percent, and post-grokking variance drops by 1696 times, consistent with a sharp phase transition in representation space. Using ILDR as an early stopping trigger reduces training by 18.6 percent on average. Optimizer interventions triggered at the ILDR threshold demonstrate bidirectional control over the transition, suggesting ILDR tracks representational conditions underlying generalization rather than a downstream correlate.