On the Convergence of Adam, Revisited

Adam is one of the most widely implemented and influential modern optimizers. Why is it effective across different optimization problems in practice? This question arguably lies at the center of the optimization community over the last decade and has motivated a substantial body of work aimed at understanding its convergence behavior. However, existing studies have mainly focused on the convergence rate of Adam in smooth nonconvex optimization, which unfortunately does not adequately capture practical settings, since many real-world problems are nonsmooth, such as those arising in training neural networks. Thus, these studies cannot fully explain the popularity and empirical success of Adam. Recently, an insightful and powerful framework called Online-to-Nonconvex Conversion has opened a new way to analyze Adam for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. Unfortunately, prior works along this line share two common limitations. First, all of them ignore the important bias-correction term in the original Adam algorithm. Second and more importantly, many of them require extra operations that are not used in Adam, such as a clipping step. Therefore, the convergence guarantee for the original Adam method still remains unclear. In this work, we present the first finite-time analysis for the classical form of Adam, i.e., with the bias-correction step and without further algorithmic modifications, and prove that a randomly scaled learning rate ensures a convergence rate of $1/T^{\frac{2}{13}}$ for nonsmooth nonconvex optimization. Moreover, our result provably applies to the modern heavy-tailed noise regime, which is closer to practice. Interestingly, our theory is established under the parameter choice $β_1=β_2$, aligning with the recent empirical studies.

We provide a theoretical analysis of Adam under non-stationary stochastic objectives, separating two regimes: Euclidean tracking under adaptive strong monotonicity of the Adam-preconditioned mean-gradient operator, and high-probability projected stationarity guarantees under general $L$-smooth objectives. In the tracking regime, we derive finite-time expected and high-probability bounds that decompose sharply into four components: initialization, objective drift, a first-moment tracking error governed by $\beta_1$, and a preconditioner perturbation governed by $\beta_2$. We characterize the burn-in time required for the transient terms to decay to the asymptotic tracking bound under constant and step-decay schedules. We also prove a high-probability bound on the average projected stationarity gap for Adam under distribution shift. Across both analyses, our bounds reveal a noise--drift tradeoff: in noise-dominated regimes, first-moment averaging and adaptive preconditioning can yield favorable upper guarantees, whereas in drift-dominated regimes, stale first-moment information and preconditioner perturbations can enlarge Adam's tracking guarantee, potentially allowing vanilla SGD to attain a smaller tracking error. Our explicit $(\beta_1,\beta_2,\epsilon)$-dependent bounds identify mechanisms through which adaptive step-sizing can help or hurt under nonstationarity and provide theoretical explanations consistent with Adam's empirical instability and stabilization under distribution shift.

We establish the first convergence guarantees for the plain vector-form Adam optimizer under heavy-tailed stochastic noise. While several Adam variants are known to achieve optimal iteration complexity in bounded-variance nonsmooth nonconvex optimization, little is understood about their behavior when stochastic gradients admit only a bounded $p$-th central moment for some $p \in (1,2]$, a setting increasingly observed in modern deep learning. To address this gap, we generalize the recent online-to-nonconvex conversion framework to accommodate heavy-tailed martingale-difference noise. Building on this generalized framework, we develop a discounted regret analysis for Adam, without restrictive parameter coupling. Our results show that Adam converges to $(ρ,ε)$-stationary points under heavy-tailed noise. However, it exhibits a suboptimal iteration complexity and $p$-dependent convergence, a suboptimality that persists even in the bounded-variance case ($p=2$). Specifically, the $ε$-dominant term in the iteration complexity for reaching in-expectation stationarity is $T=\mathrm{O}\left(Δρ^{1/2}(G+σ)^{\frac{5p}{3p-4}}ε^{-\left(\frac{5p}{3p-4}+\frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)$ for $p\in(\frac{4}{3},2]$, which simplifies to $T=\mathrm{O}(ε^{-13/2})$ when $p=2$. When the domain radius is known and used to control the online-learner output, a standard setup in related literature, the convergence rate improves to match the optimal complexity. In this case, the $ε$-dominant iteration complexity is $T=\mathrm{O}\left(Δρ^{1/2}(G+σ)^{\frac{p}{p-1}}ε^{-\left(\frac{p}{p-1}+\frac{3}{2}\right)}\right)$ for $p\in(1,2]$, which simplifies to $T=\mathrm{O}(ε^{-7/2})$ when $p=2$. These findings provide new theoretical insight into the robustness and limitations of Adam in heavy-tailed regimes.