Technical lectures mix Mandarin speech with English technical terms. These terms carry the core meaning of the lecture, yet they occupy few characters. Character error rate (CER) therefore hides their recognition failures. We study whether lecture context helps recognize these terms. We build a term-rich Mandarin AI/ML lecture benchmark, and we define term-centric metrics that measure technical-term recognition directly. We then propose a two-pass, reference-free decoding method. The first pass runs segment-only ASR. We extract the most frequent technical terms from the first-pass hypotheses, and we prompt the recognizer with this self-built glossary in the second pass. Across five ASR backbones, the first-pass glossary raises term recall for every model and holds or lowers CER on all five. On Breeze-ASR-25 it lifts term recall from 52.50% to 60.13% while lowering CER, and a hybrid that adds a small external term list reaches 62.05% recall and 82.73% term precision. Lecture context, recovered from the model's own output, is a practical signal for technical-term recognition. Term-centric evaluation exposes errors that CER misses.
Contextual ASR can benefit from semantic cues or from target words explicitly provided in the context. We introduce HearInContext, a Mandarin-English benchmark that pairs shared synthetic speech with assistant replies supporting different interpretations. The benchmark comprises 3,764 semantic test cases built around homophones. Implicit contexts exclude candidate words; explicit contexts name the target. No-context and unrelated-context controls measure the benefit of relevant history and sensitivity to irrelevant history. Context-capable models benefit from implicit cues but achieve higher target recall with explicit hints. Fine-tuning Qwen3-ASR-1.7B improves implicit-context target recall by 11.4 percentage points in both Mandarin and English, while absolute CER/WER changes on AISHELL-1 and LibriSpeech remain below 0.1 percentage points. Gains extend to explicit conditions excluded from fine-tuning and to Mandarin hotword recognition on real recordings. Code and data are available at https://github.com/OPPO-Mente-Lab/HearInContext
Recognizing new and rare words - named entities, acronyms, domain specific special words, and other items scarce in training data - remains a key challenge for automatic speech recognition (ASR). We compare two strategies for this: context biasing methods, where an ASR model is extended such that during inference a word list can be supplied, and speech large language models (LLMs) prompted with context directly. We evaluate two context biasing methods based on Whisper against three speech LLMs across read and non-read speech, reporting biased, unbiased, and overall word error rate (WER). The context biasing methods cut biased WER by up to 88% relative while leaving other words largely unaffected. Speech LLMs excel on read speech but generalize less well to non-read speech, and prove sensitive to distractor count and prompt word order. We characterize the resulting trade-offs to guide method selection.
Extra context is valuable for simultaneous speech translation of technical talks, but injecting the entire document context into every streaming segment is often too coarse. Through diagnostic experiments, we find that context gains mainly come from paper-specific terminology recovery rather than uniform semantic enhancement. We therefore propose EGTA, an Evidence-Grounded Terminology Adaptation framework that builds a document terminology memory, selects compact candidate terms conditioned on the current streaming state, and adapts ASR/speech-side and decoder-side decision spaces using only the selected terms. EGTA can be instantiated in cascaded, end-to-end, and generation-only SimulST settings without full-model fine-tuning. We evaluate EGTA on an ACL technical-talk SimulST evaluation suite consisting of MCIF-dev and ACL60/60-dev. On MCIF-dev, EGTA-RG improves BLEU by +1.05/+0.59, XCOMET-XL by +0.019/+0.006, named-entity recall by +79%/+73% relative, and acronym recall by +0.099/+0.171 on En→Zh and En→De. Across MCIF-dev latency settings, EGTA consistently improves XCOMET-XL, named-entity recall, and acronym recall. External validation on ACL60/60-dev further shows consistent terminology-recall gains without additional fine-tuning. Shuffled-memory controls and activation audits provide evidence that the improvements are tied to paper-specific evidence alignment rather than generic context prompting.