CP-WSP: A Declarative CP-SAT Framework for Configurable Multi-Constraint Workforce Scheduling

Healthcare workforce scheduling is an NP-hard optimization problem requiring simultaneous satisfaction of labor regulations, coverage requirements, employee preferences and cost objectives. Existing approaches (genetic algorithms, integer programming, constraint programming) model 6-12 constraints at shift-level granularity and cannot guarantee regulatory compliance. They also lack support for multi-role, multi-skill heterogeneity, mandatory break scheduling with midpoint control, acuity-weighted workload equity, sub-shift granularity, inter-week stability, and cross-midnight shifts. This paper presents CP-SAT: a Constraint Programming formulation for multi-role, multi-skill healthcare scheduling. CP-SAT enforces 14 hard constraints guaranteeing zero regulatory violations, while optimizing 15 soft objectives via a unified weighted penalty function. Contributions include a shift-window decomposition enabling break scheduling with centrality control, acuity-weighted workload equity, multi-granularity resolution from 15 minutes to 1 day, inter-week stability, and grid-offset preprocessing mapping cross-midnight shifts into a single scheduling day without solver changes. CP-SAT is evaluated on 18 instances: five synthetic hospital units (10-33 nurses), 10 INRC-II benchmarks (5-80 nurses, up to 8-week horizons) and 3 NRP-23 compatible instances (10-25 nurses) with cross-midnight Night shifts. Results: zero hard-constraint violations across all 18 instances by construction; proven optimality on INRC-II n005w4 (objective 118, gap 0.0%, 104s); feasible schedules scaling to 179,800 variables and 351,425 constraints (80 nurses); service quality improved 50-67% over MOGA; and model size scaling near-linearly at approximately 4,400 variables per employee. The formulation enforces 29 total constraints (14 hard, 15 soft), nearly three times the industry average.

PyCSP$^3$ provides a productive way to build constraint models for solving combinatorial constrained problems and export them to XCSP$^3$, preserving a complete separation between modeling and solving. However, it lacks native support for scheduling abstractions such as interval variables, sequence variables, and resource functions. As a result, scheduling models must be encoded with low-level integer variables and manual channeling constraints, even though PyCSP$^3$ already provides global constraints like NoOverlap and Cumulative on integer arrays. We present PyCSP$^3$ Scheduling, a library that adds scheduling abstractions to PyCSP$^3$ through 53 dedicated constraints and 27 expressions, and compiles them down to standard PyCSP$^3$/XCSP$^3$ constraints, maintaining the modeling/solving separation that underpins the PyCSP$^3$ ecosystem. On 261 paired instances across 17 model families (5 runs each), both formulations produce identical objectives on all 72 doubly-proved optimal pairs and nearly half of the families (8/17) remain structurally unchanged after compilation; however, runtime performance diverges across families, with clear gains on some (up to 5.8x) and regressions on others due to the overhead of compilation decompositions. Code and benchmarks are available at: https://github.com/sohaibafifi/pycsp3-scheduling

This paper introduces SCHEDBench, a natural-language benchmark for evaluating combinatorial scheduling constraint faithfulness under surface-form variation. Grounded in canonical scheduling instances and solver-derived feasibility and optimality, SCHEDBench assesses whether large language models (LLMs) generate schedules with the same constraint-feasible behavior across varied natural-language (NL) surface forms. SCHEDBench spans 1,132 instances across job-shop scheduling problems (JSP), single and multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems (RCPSP), nurse rostering/scheduling, and curriculum timetabling problems of varying difficulty. Instances are templated into natural language problems using domain-specific templates, themed entities, lexical-syntactic template rephrasing, and constraint-level surface-form variation, with reference solutions verified for feasibility and objective optimality. Across thirteen frontier and open-weight LLMs, we find that models are not reliably invariant to semantically equivalent renderings of the same scheduling problem. Surface-form variation reduces feasibility and induces above-noise shifts in per-instance hard-constraint violations on matched instances. Among the tested isolated axes, constraint reordering yields the clearest above-noise sensitivity.