How Far is Too Far? Defining the Distance Threshold for Verification Siamese Networks

Verification of model outputs is rapidly emerging as a key primitive for both training and real-world deployment of large language models (LLMs). In practice, this often involves using imperfect LLM judges and reward models since ground truth acquisition can be time-consuming and expensive. We introduce Fully Unsupervised Score Ensembling (FUSE), a method for improving verification quality by ensembling verifiers without access to ground truth correctness labels. The key idea behind FUSE is to control conditional dependencies between verifiers in a manner that improves the unsupervised performance of a class of spectral algorithms from the ensembling literature. Despite requiring zero ground truth labels, FUSE typically matches or improves upon semi-supervised alternatives in test-time scaling experiments with diverse sets of generator models, verifiers, and benchmarks. In particular, we validate our method on both conventional academic benchmarks such as GPQA Diamond and on frontier, unsaturated benchmarks such as Humanity's Last Exam and IMO Shortlist questions.

The advent of foundation models have enabled a new era in zero-shot classification. Yet, key challenges persist. Despite their impressive generalization power that leverages the immense pre-training knowledge, both foundation models for image and text as well as vision-text hybrids lack the representational power needed for fine-grained, minutiae-based class separation that some real-world tasks require. To address the current gaps in the literature, we propose VeriCam, a pipeline designed to learn highly specialized features that enable classification of unknown classes in unseen data. VeriCam works by leveraging the representation power of image models trained for the verification task, where the model develops an intricate feature space that incorporates fine-grained details. By training a model to discriminate between pairs of images from the same and different classes, a relational graph is constructed, representing the class relationships between data points. We then present two approaches for graph clustering: a naive algorithm and a specific setup for the Leiden graph clustering algorithm. The pipeline is validated on the LPLCv2 dataset, which comprises real-world traffic surveillance images. We show that the dataset carries an inherent capture device bias that is posed as a generalization challenge for downstream License Plate recognition tasks such as OCR. As such, we dynamically identify capture devices with a label-agnostic approach, enabling the construction of a fair and unbiased benchmark. In the cross-device scenario, our pipeline reaches an F1-Score of 93.45 in the verification baseline and a V-Measure score of 80.13 in the clustering step. All code is publicly available at https://github.com/lmlwojcik/VeriCam

Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in general visual reasoning, yet their applicability to rigorous biometric tasks remains unexplored. This work presents an exploratory study evaluating the zero-shot performance of state-of-the-art VLMs (GPT-5.2 and Gemini 2.5 Pro) on the Signature Verification Challenge (SVC) benchmark. To enable visual processing, raw kinematic time-series are converted into static images, encoding pressure information into stroke opacity whenever available in the source data. Furthermore, we introduce a scoring protocol that extracts latent token probabilities to compute robust biometric scores. Experimental results reveal a significant performance dichotomy dependent on signal quality and forgery type. In random forgery scenarios, the zero-shot VLM achieves exceptional discrimination, with GPT-5.2 reaching an Equal Error Rate of 0.32% in mobile tasks, outperforming supervised state-of-the-art systems. Conversely, in skilled forgery scenarios, where the task is more challenging because both signatures are almost identical, the results are significantly worse, and a critical "Rationalization Trap" emerges: chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning degrades performance as the model produces kinematic hallucinations to justify forgery artifacts as natural variability.