physics.ao-phJul 6, 2026

Integrating GNSS-Derived Zenith Wet Delay into a Weather Foundation Model Improves Precipitation Forecasting

Authors: Leonardo TrentiniFanny LehmannLaura CrocettiBenedikt Soja

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), best known for positioning, also serve weather science, as atmospheric water vapour delays their signals. This delay, the Zenith Wet Delay (ZWD), is a direct, all-weather measure of column moisture. Although assimilated into numerical weather prediction for decades, ZWD is not yet used by leading machine learning weather models (MLWM), despite addressing a known deficiency: the underestimation of severe precipitation. Here we present the first integration of GNSS-derived ZWD into Aurora, a state-of-the-art weather foundation model. Our extended Aurora learns ZWD with skill comparable to its pretrained variables. More importantly, including ZWD systematically improves forecasts when fine-tuning for six-hour accumulated precipitation. Gains grow with severity, reaching an 8.8% increase in Equitable Threat Score at the 99th percentile, while the precipitation power spectrum becomes more realistic at synoptic and planetary scales. Direct GNSS observations therefore encode information that MLWM can exploit for high-impact precipitation.

Explore similar work

Date pendingphysics.ao-ph

Improving precipitation forecasts in an AI weather model using observational data

Artificial intelligence weather prediction systems now surpass state-of-the-art physical models for medium-range forecasting. However, because these models are trained almost exclusively on historical climate reanalyses, they inherit pervasive structural biases, particularly for precipitation. Here we fine-tune a global graph-transformer architecture directly on high-resolution, satellite-derived precipitation observations. The resulting model reduces global medium-range probabilistic forecasting errors by up to 19% and improves extreme rainfall prediction accuracy by 57% over current operational models. It additionally demonstrates superior skill for tropical storms and drizzle events, though a physics-based operational model remains more reliable for the heaviest precipitation events. Our results demonstrate that incorporating observation-based data directly into training can substantially improve precipitation forecasts.
Julian F. Schmitt, Bertrand Delorme, Robert C. King +4
Sep 3, 2026cs.LG

WeatherNext 3: Increasing resolution and performance of global weather models with raw observations

State-of-the-art AI weather models have shown impressive medium-range forecast skill and computational efficiency, but suffer two key shortcomings: their forecasts have lower spatial and temporal resolution than the best physics-based models and they are exclusively initialized with and trained on analysis data. As a result, they cannot directly make use of observations, and any biases in the analysis are inherited by the forecast. WeatherNext 3 addresses these shortcomings and establishes a new state-of-the-art for probabilistic medium-range forecasting skill. First, WeatherNext 3 generates new forecasts every hour (rather than every 6 hours like traditional global models) by ingesting low-latency geostationary satellite data. Second, WeatherNext 3's temporal and spatial resolution are on par with physics-based global models, with hourly time steps and 0.1 degree resolution for single-level variables, including solar radiation and cloud cover. Third, WeatherNext 3 moves beyond traditional analysis variables by learning to predict satellite-derived precipitation estimates, as well as tropical cyclone and station observations. Modelling sparse station data allows WeatherNext 3 to make 2m temperature and dewpoint predictions at any location and time, conditioned on local geographical features, with substantially lower error than competing global models, even when evaluated against unseen stations. Together, WeatherNext 3's capabilities move operational AI-based weather forecasting beyond emulating the traditionally distinct stages of data assimilation, forecasting and post-processing, which helps to further push the frontier of performance and granularity for global weather prediction.
Stephan Rasp, Boris Babenko, Dominic Masters +22
Sep 15, 2026cs.LG

IRENE: A Convolutional GRU Ensemble Model for Radar Precipitation Nowcasting over Italy

We present IRENE (Italian Radar Ensemble Nowcasting Experiment), a deep learning model for probabilistic short-range precipitation nowcasting over the Italian domain at \SI{1}{km} spatial and 5 min temporal resolution. IRENE adopts an encoder--forecaster architecture built on multi-scale Convolutional Gated Recurrent Units (ConvGRUs), trained on the national radar composite produced by the Italian Civil Protection Department (DPC). An importance-sampling scheme focuses training on precipitation-relevant events, while the almost-fair Continuous Ranked Probability Score (afCRPS) is adopted as the primary probabilistic loss function. Two additional training configurations are proposed: an adversarial (GAN) variant, IRENE-GAN, designed to improve the spatial sharpness of the generated forecasts, and a spectrally constrained variant, IRENE-GAN-RAPSD, in which the adversarial objective is complemented by an explicit penalty on the radially averaged power spectral density. The three configurations are evaluated against the stochastic extrapolation method STEPS and the pre-trained deep learning model DGMR. All IRENE configurations attain a lower Continuous Ranked Probability Score than both benchmarks at every lead time and rank histograms closer to uniformity, indicating better probabilistic skill and ensemble calibration. In terms of ensemble-mean mean absolute error the advantage is confined to the first 90 min, beyond which the strongly damped DGMR fields and, to a lesser extent, STEPS become competitive. Spectral analysis shows that the adversarial training removes the progressive loss of small-scale variance exhibited by IRENE, at the cost of an excess of fine-scale power at long lead times that the spectral penalty only partially controls.
Alessandro Camilletti, Gabriele Franch, Elena Tomasi +1