TriA Pipeline: A Large-Scale Automatic Audio Annotation Pipeline For Audio Classification In Specific Scenarios

Existing audio question answering benchmarks largely emphasize sound event classification or caption-grounded queries, often enabling models to succeed through shortcut strategies, short-duration cues, lexical priors, dataset-specific biases, or even bypassing audio via metadata and captions rather than genuine reasoning Thus, we present AUDITA (Audio Understanding from Diverse Internet Trivia Authors), a large-scale, real-world benchmark to rigorously evaluate audio reasoning beyond surface-level acoustic recognition. AUDITA comprises carefully curated, human-authored trivia questions grounded in real-world audio, designed to stress robust auditory reasoning through challenging distractors and long-range temporal dependencies, using probing queries that cannot be answered from isolated text or sound cues alone. Human average accuracy of 32.13% shows both the challenge of the task while demonstrating meaningful comprehension of the audio. In stark contrast, state of-the-art audio question answering models perform poorly, with average accuracy below 8.86%. Beyond raw accuracy, we apply Item Response Theory (IRT) to estimate latent proficiency, question difficulty, and expose systematic deficiencies of the models and data.

Weakly labeled datasets such as AudioSet have driven recent progress in audio tagging. However, annotation quality varies across sound classes. Labels may be incomplete, ambiguous, or unreliable, which introduces class-dependent supervision bias during optimisation. The issue becomes harder as real and generated audio are increasingly mixed in training, and generated samples do not always match their intended semantic labels. Prior work mainly addressed unreliable supervision from missing-positive labels, while this paper targets three other sources of unreliable supervision: spurious additions, misassignments between similar classes, and weakened label evidence. These effects introduce class-dependent optimisation bias that is not explicitly modeled by most existing methods. To bridge this gap, the paper proposes a Class-wise Supervision Unreliability (CSU) framework that controls supervision strength at the class level during training. CSU learns a separate unreliability parameter for each class and down-weights less reliable supervision without changing the model architecture or inference process. To support evaluations, this paper also introduces ESC-FreeGen50, a manually verified benchmark of 50 sound classes that combines real and generated audio. Experiments on controlled benchmarks and AudioSet show that CSU improves robustness across different architectures and different sources of supervision unreliability. The results indicate that explicit class-wise modeling of supervision unreliability is an effective and practical strategy for robust audio tagging under large-scale weakly labeled training. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/Yuanbo2020/CSU

We frame the system as diagnostic data curation for a large audio-language model: before fine-tuning, we probe Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct under normal, empty-audio, and shuffled-audio conditions to identify how the model's answers change when audio evidence is removed or mismatched. These model confusion patterns are used to bucket training samples into text-prior, shuffle-leak, strong audio-dependent, and hard or misleading cases. Our strongest train-only system fine-tunes only on strong-audio items, where the normal audio-question pair is correct but both counterfactual variants fail, plus a small number of empty-audio negatives and a text-only response normalizer for parse-failed generations. On the official development set, the best train-only system reaches 67.27% accuracy after response normalization, compared with 65.90% for our local Qwen3-Omni baseline. Final submissions additionally include models trained using train+development splits and a three-model ensemble.