Process industries have accumulated validated specialist models, yet sensor drift, feedstock variation, and regime switching cause these models to degrade systematically in new scenarios. Collecting new labeled data and retraining is costly, while continuing with the original model incurs persistent bias. Existing adaptation methods require modifying model parameters with sufficient labeled data, making rapid response on deployed systems difficult. Using LLMs as direct predictors risks hallucinations and uncontrollable outputs. Such predictors also cannot incorporate unstructured scenario knowledge from the field. To address these limitations, this article proposes Reasoning-Driven Open Adaptation for Specialist Models (ROAM), a framework that uses LLM world knowledge and reasoning to adapt frozen specialist models to unseen scenarios without retraining. ROAM confines all corrections to a low-dimensional, semantically interpretable latent space. LLM-generated scenario judgments and online observations are fused under a unified probabilistic framework. A risk-constrained mechanism suppresses corrections under unreliable LLM evidence or abrupt scenario shifts and falls back to the original frozen model when evidence is insufficient. Experiments on a mineral thickening process and the public IndPenSim penicillin fermentation dataset show that ROAM reduces MAE by over 20% in major shift settings such as hidden shifts with only 839 additional parameters and under 0.02,ms per-step overhead. These results indicate that LLM reasoning can be turned into a conservative adaptation signal for industrial models already in service.
Manufacturing consumes one third of global energy and still has significant room for improvement in terms of energy efficiency. Optimal process control is essential for this purpose. However, synthesizing mathematical optimization models from messy, real-world industrial specifications requires bridging unstructured natural language and spatial diagrams with rigorous mathematical syntax. This poses a profound challenge for general-purpose Large Language Models (LLMs), which may introduce invalid constraints when tasked with modeling continuous multi-physics dynamics. To address this, we introduce little m, an AI agent designed to assist the formulation of industrial process control models. Combining a domain-specific knowledge repository with LLM-driven interaction, the proposed framework formulates real-world optimization problems as mathematical models. For systematic evaluation, we introduce the Industrial Process Control Benchmark (IPC-Bench), a novel multimodal dataset of 50 canonical scenarios requiring joint reasoning over text and process diagrams. Through comprehensive automated structural assessments and double-blind human evaluation, little m substantially outperforms state-of-the-art LLMs, generating semantically correct models. These evaluations assess formulation quality rather than solver feasibility, formal physical validity, or closed-loop industrial performance. The implementation of little m and the IPC-Bench dataset are available at https://github.com/yeyongchao/process-modeling-benchmark.
Continual learning capability is critical for Industrial LLMs, as deployed models must be continuously updated to meet evolving requirements and environments, rather than repeatedly retrained from scratch. However, most existing research focuses on improvements on static benchmarks, failing to capture real industrial needs. In this survey, we reformulate Industrial Continual Learning (ICL) for LLMs as a closed-loop update-and-release problem in a versioned ecosystem, where updates propagate hierarchically to industrial, application-specific models and LLM-powered applications, with capability inheritance and transfer across versions and model families. From this ecosystem perspective, we identify three core challenges: repeated adaptation erodes model plasticity, foundation-model upgrades break capability inheritance, and long-term sustainability is constrained by deployment requirements. We then organize the technical landscape of ICL around five lifecycle design principles: preserving plasticity headroom, treating upgrades as capability transfer, enabling trustworthy continual reinforcement learning, making training recipes self-optimizing, and building accountability as a base layer for long-term iteration. For each principle, we synthesize representative technical directions. Finally, we evaluate the maturity of each principle and its technical components via an evidence-based lens, identify key gaps hindering real-world deployment, and outline a practical ICL deployment blueprint and a pathway for feeding industrial realities back into academic research.
Large Language Models (LLMs) generalize across tasks through reusable representations and flexible reasoning, yet remain brittle in real deployment when faced with evolving tasks and continual distribution shift. While test-time adaptation addresses this by updating models with unsupervised objectives on test data, prevailing methods are fundamentally limited by their neglect of source knowledge preservation and adaptation signal reliability. Inspired by how Drosophila orchestrates memory update by balancing retroactive and proactive interference via Rac1 and MAPK pathways, we design Synapse Consolidation (SyCo) with two core components: a Rac1-inspired plasticity confiner and a MAPK-inspired update controller. The former dynamically confines plasticity to a tail-gradient subspace that is less critical for source knowledge, enabling rapid specialization while preserving source representations. The latter uses a tiered controller to suppress noisy updates and consolidate useful adaptations under non-stationary streams. To further model real deployments with multiple sources and continually emerging tasks, we introduce Multi-source Open-set Adaptation (MOA) setting, where a model is trained on multiple labeled source tasks and then adapts on open, non-stationary unlabeled test streams mixing seen and unseen tasks with partial overlap in label and intent space. Across 18 NLP datasets under the MOA setting, SyCo consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving 78.31% on unseen-task adaptation and 85.37% versus unseen-data shifts, setting a new state-of-the-art.