The Anatomy of Implicit Bias: Information Allocation in Neural Network Training

Hessian spectral properties are a standard tool in analysing neural-network training, with eigenvalues linked to sharpness, generalization, and optimization dynamics. Eigenvalues quantify curvature magnitude, while eigenvectors identify which parameters generate that curvature. In this work, we study how the leading Hessian eigenvectors evolve during training and how they affect the learning trajectories. We track the training dynamics of multilayer perceptrons on a classification problem and measure eigenvector dynamics through two complementary statistics: (i) displacement over time, inspired by analyses of glassy systems, and (ii) localization via the inverse participation ratio. The metrics are compared against a random null model of the Hessian induced by the architecture. Our results reveal clear optimizer-dependent behaviour. SGD leads to progressively more stable leading curvature directions, while Adam exhibits substantially stronger reorganization of eigenvectors throughout training. We also observe a localization phenomenon under Adam, where a small subset of parameters contributes disproportionately to the leading curvature directions. These results suggest that Hessian eigenvector dynamics capture key differences in optimizer behaviour and the resulting training trajectories.

Many neural networks operations have a multiplicative nature rather than additive: halving or doubling a norm are analogous relatively but require unequal optimization distances when taking linear steps. Adaptive optimizers such as Adam normalize updates per coordinate, but update steps remain additive; weights with very different magnitudes receive similarly sized absolute changes, producing very different relative perturbations. We introduce \textbf{\method} (\textbf{\methodshort}), a weight reparameterization for neural networks that combines a sign-aware symmetric-exponential pathway with an identity-like linear pathway. The symmetric-exponential pathway is near-linear for small raw weights but increasingly curved at larger magnitudes. Additive updates in logarithmic space map to magnitude-proportional changes in effective weight space. The linear pathway provides a direct route through the transform that we hypothesize stabilizes optimization, while learnable scale, curvature, and offset parameters control balance between pathways and the curvature of the exponential pathway. These components create a curved parameter-space geometry that empirically improves speed of loss descent over standard linear parameterization. We also identify a useful \emph{mismatched initialization}: raw weights are chosen so a symmetric version of the transform matches Xavier statistics, but training uses an asymmetric forward transform that leaves positive weights at full strength while making negative weights smaller in magnitude; in small-model ablations, this improves early optimization and may act as a form of symmetry breaking. We train transformers on OpenWebText over nine width$\times$depth configurations, \methodshort reaches matched validation loss in 1.32--1.49$\times$ fewer training steps, with the largest widths seeing the biggest gains.

Preconditioned optimizers are central to language model training, but their stochastic update rules are usually treated as direct approximations to population preconditioned descent. We show that this view misses two finite-sample biases. First, the gradient and preconditioner are typically estimated from the same minibatch, introducing gradient--preconditioner coupling bias. Second, even when the preconditioner estimate is unbiased, its inverse or inverse-root is generally biased because inversion is nonlinear. We propose a single-batch bias-correction framework that addresses both effects: cross-fitted preconditioning estimates the numerator and preconditioner from independent microbatch groups, while variance-corrected inversion uses microbatch variability to subtract the leading delta-method bias term. The framework applies to diagonal moment, diagonal curvature, and matrix preconditioning methods, instantiated in AdamW, Sophia, and Shampoo. Bias correction reduces held-out pretraining loss on Qwen2.5-0.5B by $0.15$, $0.07$, and $0.11$ nats, respectively; the effects on mixed-quality pretraining and downstream instruction tuning are consistently neutral-to-positive. Together, these results establish bias correction as a practical mechanism for reducing finite-sample update bias and improving the performance of preconditioned optimizers.