cs.CVJul 9, 2026

VEGAS: Human-Aligned Video Caption Evaluation via Gaze

Authors: Shenghui ChenPo-han LiXimeng SunShijia YangEmad BarsoumZicheng LiuSandeep ChinchaliUfuk Topcu

Organizations: The University of Texas at Austin · AMD

Abstract

Vision-language models excel at video captioning, yet typically generate descriptions that fail to capture individual viewers' attention. We propose VEGAS (Video caption Evaluation via GAze Score), a training-free metric that leverages test-time gaze to sample personalized, attention-aligned text. It is a cross-modal, information-theoretic metric that quantifies how well a candidate caption matches a viewer's focus. To evaluate VEGAS, we curate a dataset of egocentric activities and instructional slides paired with synchronized gaze and reference annotations. We then select captions based on VEGAS via rejection sampling without model retraining. Experiments show that VEGAS-selected captions align significantly better with human focus and improve downstream caption-to-video retrieval, demonstrating the practical utility of incorporating viewer attention during inference.

Explore similar work

May 23, 2025cs.CV

VIBE: Annotation-Free Video-to-Text Information Bottleneck Evaluation for TL;DR

Many decision-making tasks, where both accuracy and efficiency matter, still require human supervision. For example, tasks like traffic officers reviewing hour-long dashcam footage or researchers screening conference videos can benefit from concise summaries that reduce cognitive load and save time. Yet current vision-language models (VLMs) often produce verbose, redundant outputs that hinder task performance. Existing video caption evaluation depends on costly human annotations and overlooks the summaries' utility in downstream tasks. We address these gaps with Video-to-text Information Bottleneck Evaluation (VIBE), an annotation-free method that scores VLM outputs using two metrics: grounding (how well the summary aligns with visual content) and utility (how informative it is for the task). VIBE selects from randomly sampled VLM outputs by ranking them according to the two scores to support effective human decision-making. Human studies on LearningPaper24, SUTD-TrafficQA, and LongVideoBench show that summaries selected by VIBE consistently improve performance-boosting task accuracy by up to 61.23% and reducing response time by 75.77% compared to naive VLM summaries or raw video.
Shenghui Chen, Po-han Li, Sandeep Chinchali +1
Sep 9, 2026cs.CV

Putting Captions to the Test: Evaluating Video Caption Quality through Multiple-Choice Question Answering

Evaluating video captioning remains a critical challenge for Visual Large Language Models (VLLMs). Existing metrics primarily rely on matching generated text against ground-truth references. This paradigm suffers from the ``one-to-many'' nature of video description, where high-quality captions are often penalized for lexical mismatches or valid shifts in visual focus. Furthermore, such assessments are typically one-dimensional, failing to provide a fine-grained analysis of caption quality. To address this, we redefine caption quality through the lens of information fidelity: A caption must maximize the coverage of salient visual information while ensuring strict factuality. We introduce CapQuiz, a novel reference-free benchmark that assesses captions based on their utility in answering human-verified, fine-grained, multiple-choice questions derived from the video. CapQuiz features a hierarchical taxonomy of 10 question types (spanning Descriptive and Inferential categories) across 24 diverse video domains. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CapQuiz correlates significantly better with human judgments than existing metrics and offers interpretable insights into model performance.
Zizhen Wang, Bo Feng, Zhengfeng Lai +5
Jul 22, 2026cs.CV

PercepCap: Video Captioner with Structured Spatio-Temporal Perception

Video captioning requires fine-grained spatio-temporal understanding of videos, including spatial perception of where objects are located and temporal perception of when events occur. Existing MLLMs usually generate captions directly from video inputs without exposing the perceptual evidence behind descriptions. As a result, mistakes in spatiotemporal perception are only observed in the final caption, making it difficult to identify the underlying perceptual errors directly. To address these issues, we present PercepCap, a perception-aware video captioning framework that makes perceptual evidence explicit before producing the final caption. Specifically, PercepCap follows a perceive-describe generation chain, where the model first produces a spatiotemporal perception trace comprising object trajectories and temporal events, and then generates the final caption conditioned on the perceived evidence. To support this, we design a two-stage training strategy. Perceive-then-Describe Supervised Fine-tuning adapts the model from caption-only generation to the proposed perceive-describe chain, while Perception-Grounded Reinforcement Learning optimizes perception trace and caption quality with joint rewards over perception chain and the final caption. To support our two-stage training, we introduce Caption-Anchored Perception Data Construction. This pipeline builds the SFT and RL training data by first generating a caption-only description, extracting the objects and events it mentions, and grounding them back in the video with boxes and timestamps. This yields caption-aligned perception data that provides solid training ground truth, ensuring that the explicit perception trace and final caption refer to the same objects and events. Across direct caption and caption-to-QA evaluation, PercepCap consistently improves upon the Qwen3-VL baseline and demonstrates leading caption quality.
Yifan Xu, Zihao Wang, Zhixiao Wang +6