cs.CVJul 14, 2026

Traceback Translators Against Forgetting in Continual Fake Speech Detection

Authors: Enrico GottardisMattia TamiazzoSimone Milani

Organizations: Department of Information Engineering · University of Padova · Padova, Italy

Abstract

Fake speech detectors are increasingly challenged by the development of new and more accurate generative models. To cope with this problem, continual learning techniques are nowadays widely considered feasible strategies for updating models to new datasets, but they also lead to decreased performance on previously seen samples (catastrophic forgetting). In this work, we propose a forgetting-resilient solution based on the adoption of domain translators within a frozen detector, which remaps the new feature spaces into the original ones by means of a traceback translator network. Experimental results show that this strategy enables the achievement of high detection rates with respect to traditional retraining, while minimizing the computational effort and preserving the detection accuracy on previous data.

Explore similar work

Sep 15, 2026eess.AS

Language Orthogonalization for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Audio Deepfake Detection

Audio deepfake detectors need to transfer to languages absent from training, as multilingual speech synthesis outpaces labeled anti-spoofing resources. While detectors increasingly rely on self-supervised speech models (S3Ms), these backbones encode language-dependent structure that confounds spoof cues. We address this confound through language orthogonalization, a target-free ridge map that removes S3M variation projected onto continuous language-identification (LID) embeddings. Across six languages, six S3M backbones, and all Leave-N-Out settings, it consistently reduces EER across unseen languages. Cross-lingual EER correlates with LID-space distance, where orthogonalization yields larger gains for more distant transfers.
Minu Kim, Ji Sub Um, Hoirin Kim
Jun 22, 2026cs.SD

The Watermark Shortcut: How Provenance Marking Sabotages Audio Deepfake Detection

Provenance watermarking is increasingly treated as a safeguard for synthetic speech, whether built directly into speech-generation models such as Chatterbox, provided through dedicated techniques such as AudioSeal, or deployed by commercial platforms such as ElevenLabs. We identify a previously uncharacterized liability: when synthetic speech is watermarked and human speech is not, detectors trained alongside latch onto the watermark as a spurious "watermark => fake" shortcut. This single feature yields three coupled failures: generalization degradation (model performance deteriorates on unseen data), strip-to-evade (a watermarked fake escapes once unwatermarked), and mark-to-frame (watermarking a real voice flags it as fake). In a controlled white-box experiment, a watermark-trained detector shows all three (for example, mark-to-frame lifts Equal Error Rate from 16% to 75%). In a black-box test of a commercial API, we show that adding a watermark to real speech disguises it as fake. However, this shortcut is fixable: retraining with the watermark on both classes decorrelates it and restores clean behavior. We release experiment data as a paired clean-versus-watermarked corpus (WASP).
Nicolas M. Müller, Pascal Debus
Jun 17, 2026cs.SD

FlowFake: Liquid Networks for Audio Deepfake Detection

Audio deepfakes generated by neural text-to-speech and voice-cloning systems threaten speaker verification and public discourse at scale. The core challenge is cross-dataset generalization: detectors trained on one synthesis pipeline collapse on unseen forgeries. We argue that this failure is primarily because of structural synthetic speech artifacts which are multi-timescale trajectory anomalies. Though every existing detector aggregates a fixed-window frame statistics, this misaligns the architecture with the signal. We propose FlowFake, a Liquid Time-Constant (LTC) architecture whose hidden state evolves via a learned ODE, with per-neuron adaptive time constants simultaneously resolving spectral (10ms) and prosodic (2s) cues. At only 34K parameters FlowFake achieves formal BIBO stability and O(dt^4) integration error. On a four-dataset cross domain benchmark (ASVspoof2019-LA, FakeOrReal, InTheWild, MLAAD), FlowFake reaches 75.29% on ASVspoof2019 trained only on FakeOrReal and 79.97% trained only on MLAAD. It outperforms RawGAT-ST and Whisper-DF on every evaluated pair and matching SSL Wav2vec2 (300x larger) at 0.01% of its parameter count. The source code is available on : https://github.com/GhostRider2023/FlowFake
Shivaay Dhondiyal, Divyansh Sharma, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma