Self-supervised Speech Comparison for L2 Phone, Rhythm, and Intonation Scoring
Authors: Stephen McIntosh, Reuben Smit, Daisuke Saito, Nobuaki Minematsu, Herman Kamper
Organizations: The University of Tokyo, Japan · Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Abstract
L2 speech assessment has traditionally focused on phonetic assessment, leaving the scoring of suprasegmental features such as rhythm and intonation underexplored. Moreover, assessment methods often require training with labeled L2 speech data, making them difficult to apply in low-resource settings. We investigate whether DTW over self-supervised WavLM representations can provide a text-free framework for assessing phonetic accuracy, rhythm, and intonation in English and Japanese L2 speech. Results show that a basic DTW-based approach that compares learner speech to native templates exceeds human agreement on holistic and sentence-level phonetic scoring. For rhythm, we introduce methods that measure the degree of warping in the DTW alignment path; our best method approaches human-level performance. For intonation, we combine DTW distance over prosodic residuals with pitch and intensity features, but performance remains more modest on some tasks. Our results point to self-supervised representations as a promising, text-free basis for multi-aspect pronunciation assessment.
Automated Speaking Assessment of non-native speech must effectively evaluate prosody, including speech rhythm, to align with human perception. However, commonly employed rhythm metrics rely on segmental duration, requiring an additional alignment step, which is error-prone in non-native speech containing disfluencies and mispronunciations. We propose an acoustics-based assessment approach that employs a convolutional neural network to extract rhythm features directly from the speech amplitude envelope, motivated by evidence linking low-frequency modulations to rhythm perception. The proposed models are trained on a proficiency score regression task using the speechocean762 dataset and compared against duration-based models. Our results show that a model using the amplitude envelope's first derivative achieves the highest correlation with human-assigned scores on the Fluency and Prosody dimensions, producing significantly lower errors than one using segment durations among less fluent speakers. The findings support acoustic envelope features as robust, alignment-free alternatives for L2 rhythm assessment. Code is released publicly.
Training automated pronunciation assessment often relies on labeled learner errors or non-native corpora that are costly to collect. We propose a lightweight framework trained only on native speech resources, operating unsupervised or lightly calibrated with a small set of scored utterances. At inference, learner speech is discretized with an SSL encoder and a K-means codebook. A token language model trained on native sequences computes surprisal where higher surprisal indicates phonotactic deviation. We add a transcript-guided Text2DUnit--DTW module that predicts native token sequences from reference text and aligns them to acoustic tokens to derive error-sensitive features. Surprisal and alignment features are fused via simple regression. On SpeechOcean762, PCC improves from 0.60 to 0.66 with transcript guidance, near supervised baselines. Cross-dataset evaluation on L2-ARCTIC shows consistent gains.
Automated L2 speech assessment can assign proficiency labels, but often lacks interpretability. We propose a rubric-guided SpeechLLM for multi-aspect, multi-granular assessment, trained with a hybrid objective combining supervised fine-tuning and Bounded Direct Preference Optimization. The model jointly predicts ordinal labels at the sentence-level (accuracy, fluency, prosody), word/phoneme-level accuracy, and generates a natural-language rationale in the same response. On SpeechOcean762, our approach matches or outperforms single-granularity models while remaining competitive with prior approaches. We analyze rationale reliability along two axes: self-consistency with model predictions and alignment with ground-truth labels, using sentiment consistency (plausibility) and mention-based agreement (faithfulness). Rationales are plausible at the sentence level, but faithfulness degrades at the word/phoneme level: references are sparse and weakly aligned with token-level labels.