Subgrid-Scale Parameterization in Burgers' Equation Using Structure-Preserving Neural Networks and Entropy Variables

Neural spectral PDE solvers often learn an entire unresolved vector field even when an inexpensive approximate model can already capture most of the trajectory. Here we introduce Perturbative-NeuSA, a residual formulation that decomposes the target solution into a low-fidelity background and a high-resolution perturbation, so that only the unresolved dynamics is learned. Starting from the exact perturbation equation, the method combines a fixed spectral operator, a background-dependent correction, the background defect in the target PDE, and an optional neural closure. This construction makes the roles of physical structure and neural closure separately measurable. Across 2D Burgers, Klein-Gordon, and heterogeneous 2D wave equations, the deterministic structured solver outperforms the trained NeuSA baseline while requiring no neural-network training. The largest gains occur on Burgers, where the deterministic correction reduces training and extrapolation errors by factors of 24 and 44, respectively. In addition, a Klein-Gordon sweep over seven background resolutions shows that the effect of the closure is conditional: it improves a poor background by 3.6 times, becomes neutral at intermediate resolutions, and degrades a well-resolved background. For the wave equation, however, the closure provides an additional 18% reduction when the remaining residual is interface-localized. Multi-initial-condition diagnostics further show that the useful closure regime depends on the initial-condition spectrum and can disappear in extrapolation when structured correction already captures the dominant Burgers dynamics. Perturbative-NeuSA therefore reframes neural closure as a conditional, diagnosable correction governed by background fidelity, residual organization, and compatibility with the closure model.

Hyperbolic conservation laws govern a wide range of transport-driven dynamics featuring shocks, contact discontinuities, and complex wave interactions, posing distinct challenges for deep-learning-based surrogate modeling. While classical numerical methods provide robust and physically admissible solutions, their computational cost restricts applicability in many-query tasks such as parametric studies and design optimization. Conversely, existing neural surrogates offer rapid inference but often fail to respect intrinsic PDE structures, leading to non-physical artifacts, rollout instability, and poor generalization. We present an interpretable, structure-preserving graph neural solver that bridges classical numerical principles with graph neural networks (GNNs). The network is designed as a learned reconstruction-and-flux operator rather than a black-box state updater, thereby inherently preserving key properties such as local conservation and upwinding. Inspired by Arbitrary high-order DERivatives schemes, we further recast message-passing GNNs as high-order space-time predictors, enabling conservative and stable neural updates with large time steps. Evaluation is performed on challenging supersonic flow benchmarks spanning broad parametric variations in geometry, initial/boundary conditions, and flow regimes. The neural solver achieves superior long-horizon rollout stability and accuracy compared with strong surrogate baselines, outperforms low-order discretizations, and delivers orders-of-magnitude runtime speedups over high-resolution simulations.

Neural network subgrid stress models often have a priori performance that is far better than the a posteriori performance, leading to neural network models that look very promising a priori completely failing in a posteriori Large Eddy Simulations (LES). This performance gap can be decreased by combining two different methods, training data augmentation and reducing input complexity to the neural network. Augmenting the training data with two different filters before training the neural networks has no performance degradation a priori as compared to a neural network trained with one filter. A posteriori, neural networks trained with two different filters are far more robust across two different LES codes with different numerical schemes. In addition, by ablating away the higher order terms input into the neural network, the a priori versus a posteriori performance changes become less apparent. When combined, neural networks that use both training data augmentation and a less complex set of inputs have a posteriori performance far more reflective of their a priori evaluation.