cs.LGJul 17, 2026

Publicly-Verifiable Certificates for Statistical Algorithms

Authors: Michael NgoMichael P. Kim

Organizations: MIT · Research completed while at Cornell University, supported by the Bowers Undergraduate Research Experience (BURE) and the Dean Archer Undergraduate Research Program. · Cornell University

Abstract

Following Goldwasser, Rothblum, Shafer, and Yehudayoff, who defined a framework for interactive proofs of learning [ITCS'21], we initiate the study of non-interactive proofs of learning. We define and study a new notion: Publicly-Verifiable Certificates of Statistical Validity (pvCSVs), which allow for public, distributionally-robust certification that the result of a learning algorithm is valid. In a pvCSV, a learner publishes a hypothesis hh and corresponding certificate ππ; then, any user, who holds a user-specific distribution, can read the pair (h,π)(h,π) and determine efficiently whether the hypothesis is valid according to the user-specific distribution. We construct pvCSVs in the context of Adaptive Statistical Query (SQ) Algorithms. To certify SQ algorithms that makes kk adaptive queries, we construct pvCSVs where the sample complexity scales with O(logk)O(\log k), whereas the sample complexity of the best learning algorithms scale with O~(k)\tilde{O}(\sqrt{k}). More generally, we study proof systems for learning in the SQ model, demonstrating the model's strengths as well as its limitations.

Explore similar work

Oct 31, 2024quant-ph

Interactive proofs for verifying (quantum) learning and testing

We consider the problem of testing and learning from data in the presence of resource constraints, such as limited memory or weak data access, which place limitations on the efficiency and feasibility of testing or learning. In particular, we ask the following question: Could a resource-constrained learner/tester use interaction with a resource-unconstrained but untrusted party to solve a learning or testing problem more efficiently than they could without such an interaction? In this work, we answer this question both abstractly and for concrete problems, in two complementary ways: For a wide variety of scenarios, we prove that a resource-constrained learner cannot gain any advantage through classical interaction with an untrusted prover. As a special case, we show that for the vast majority of testing and learning problems in which quantum memory is a meaningful resource, a memory-constrained quantum algorithm cannot overcome its limitations via classical communication with a memory-unconstrained quantum prover. In contrast, when quantum communication is allowed, we construct a variety of interactive proof protocols, for specific learning and testing problems, which allow memory-constrained quantum verifiers to gain significant advantages through delegation to untrusted provers. These results highlight both the limitations and potential of delegating learning and testing problems to resource-rich but untrusted third parties.
Matthias C. Caro, Jens Eisert, Marcel Hinsche +3
May 13, 2026stat.ML

What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable?

Valiant's 1984 paper is widely credited with introducing the PAC learning model, but it, in fact, introduced a different model: unlike PAC learning, the learner receives only positives, may issue membership queries, and must output a hypothesis with no false positives. Prior work characterized variants, including the case without queries. We revisit Valiant's original model and ask: Which classes are learnable in it? For every finite domain, including Valiant's Boolean-hypercube setting, we show that a class is learnable if and only if every realizable positive sample can be certified by a poly-size adaptive query-compression scheme. This is a new variant of sample compression where the learner certifies samples via a short interaction with the membership oracle. Our characterization shows that learnability in Valiant's model is strictly sandwiched between learnability in the PAC model and the variant of Valiant's model without membership queries. This is one of the rare cases where introducing membership queries changes the set of learnable classes, and not just the sample or computational complexity. Next, we study the natural extension of the model to arbitrary domains. While we do not obtain an exact characterization, our techniques readily generalize and show that the same strict sandwiching persists. Finally, we show that dd-dimensional halfspaces, which are not learnable without queries, are learnable with queries: we give a poly(d)O~(1/ε)\mathrm{poly}(d) \tilde{O}(1/ε) sample and poly(d)polylog(1/ε)\mathrm{poly}(d) \mathrm{polylog}(1/ε) query algorithm, and prove that at least Ω(d)Ω(d) samples or queries are necessary. To our knowledge, this is the first algorithm for halfspaces in Valiant's model. Together, these results uncover a surprisingly rich theory behind Valiant's original notion of learnability and introduce ideas that may be of independent interest in learning theory.
Steve Hanneke, Anay Mehrotra, Grigoris Velegkas +1
May 17, 2026cs.DS

Iterative Chow Filtering for Learning with Distribution Shift

Recent work due to Goel et al. gave the first efficient algorithms for learning with distribution shift in the challenging PQ framework. In this setting, a learner receives labeled training examples, unlabeled test examples, and must make correct predictions on the test set but is allowed to abstain from predicting on out-of-distribution points. Their results rely on L2{\cal L}_2 sandwiching approximations, a strong requirement that leads to poor bounds for several basic function classes such as DNF formulas. Here, we show that the weaker notion of L1{\cal L}_1 sandwiching suffices for efficient PQ learning. As a consequence, we obtain the first quasipolynomial-time PQ learning algorithm for DNFs under the uniform distribution and essentially match the guarantees known for ordinary PAC learning. More broadly, our bounds provide exponential improvements for several classes including constant depth circuits and constant degree polynomial threshold functions. Our main technical ingredient is Iterative Chow Filtering, a new procedure that uses low-degree Chow parameters to identify and remove test points incompatible with the training distribution.
Gautam Chandrasekaran, Georgios Gkrinias, Adam R. Klivans +2