Can a model be identified from one experiment? We study analytic systems that are linearly parameterized by a combination of prescribed dictionary terms, such as partial differential operators and dynamical systems. For a single input-response pair, recovery is possible exactly when the evaluated dictionary terms are linearly independent. We prove a sharp zero-one law: either no input uniquely determines the coefficients, or almost every random input sampled from a nondegenerate Gaussian measure does. This dichotomy reduces one-shot system identification to a question about degenerate inputs and provides an a posteriori certificate for any recovered model. Numerical examples recover dynamical systems, nonlinear partial differential equations, and structured matrix families from single trajectory data, while also detecting when an extra probe is necessary.
Learning governing dynamics from data is a common goal across the sciences, yet it is only well-posed when the underlying mechanisms are identifiable. In practice, many data-driven methods implicitly assume identifiability; when this assumption fails, estimated models can yield spurious predictions and invalid mechanistic conclusions. Classical identifiability guarantees for controlled linear time-invariant (LTI) systems provide sufficient conditions -- controllability and persistent excitation -- but leave open whether identifiability holds when these conditions fail, and which parts of the system remain identifiable without full identifiability. We show that the experimental setup, i.e., the realized initial state and control input, dictates a fundamental limit on the information recoverable from the observed trajectory. We develop a geometric characterization of this limit and derive a closed-form description of all systems consistent with the experimental setup. Crucially, we prove that even when the full system is not identifiable, the restricted dynamics on the subspace reachable by the experiment remain uniquely determined.
We present a physics-informed framework for system identification based on randomized stable atomic features. Impulse responses are represented as random superpositions of stable atoms, namely damped complex exponentials associated with poles sampled inside a prescribed disk. Identification is then cast as a convex regularized least-squares problem with optional linear, second-order-cone, and KYP constraints. The approach generalizes random Fourier and random Laplace features to the damped, nonstationary regime relevant to engineering systems while retaining modal interpretability and scalable finite-dimensional computation. The main analytic point is an operator-theoretic Disk-Bochner viewpoint: positive measures over stable poles generate positive-definite kernels with a radius-dependent shift defect, while a converse scalar disk moment representation for an arbitrary kernel is characterized by subnormality of the canonical shift. We prove this statement, establish an RKHS-to-l1 embedding, show that sampled poles induce a valid finite atomic gauge, discuss random-feature convergence, and state sparse-recovery guarantees conditionally on the restricted-eigenvalue properties of the realized disk-Vandermonde or input-output design matrix. We also connect the normalized transfer function problem to Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation and LFT set-membership. The framework directly encodes stability margins, modal localization, DC-gain bounds, monotonicity, passivity, relative degree, settling-time targets, and time/frequency-domain error bounds. Numerical comparisons illustrate how physically meaningful priors can compensate for poor excitation and improve constrained impulse-response recovery in an under-informative data setting.
Learning governing equations from observed solution data is a fundamental challenge in scientific machine learning, yet the theoretical conditions under which a ground-truth ODE can be uniquely and stably identified from multiple solution observations remain largely undeveloped, and no quantitative analysis of the sample complexity of such learning tasks exists in the literature. To address this gap, we introduce the Hausdorff distance on solution sets as the natural metric for comparing differential equations, since it captures the worst-case separation between two equations over all admissible initial conditions and thus encodes the minimax structure of the identification problem. We establish identifiability bounds for governing ODEs across a wide class of structure equations--ranging from linear ODEs to nonlinear classes with Lipschitz (Hölder)-continuous vector fields--characterizing precisely when two distinct equations can be distinguished from solution data. Using this metric, we derive metric entropy estimates for the relevant ODE classes and analyze sample complexity bounds, quantifying how many solution observations are needed to reliably recover the governing equation.