Disentangling Model and Human Data Uncertainty in Apparent Facial Age Estimation

Age estimation from facial images typically relies on training data that includes images of minors, a practice that raises serious ethical, legal, and privacy concerns. In this work, we propose a generalized zero-shot benchmark for facial age estimation that explicitly excludes children's data during training while still assessing model performance on younger populations. We revisit six widely used datasets and introduce standardized splits with strict age-group separation: samples aged 18-59 for training, validation, and testing; samples under 18 reserved exclusively for zero-shot evaluation; and samples 60+ as an unseen validation set for model selection under distribution shift. For datasets with identity annotations, subject-exclusive splits prevent identity leakage and better reflect real-world deployment conditions. Evaluating nine state-of-the-art age estimation methods under this protocol reveals that all evaluated methods consistently fail to generalize to unseen age groups, suffering substantial performance degradation -- on average 46.4%, and up to 52.8% -- relative to the supervised baseline. Moreover, models do not simply degrade: they systematically anchor predictions for unseen ages to nearby seen classes, a manifestation of the well-known seen-class bias in generalized zero-shot learning. By formalizing age estimation without children's data as a generalized zero-shot benchmark on existing datasets, this work highlights a critical gap between current modeling practices and real-world ethical constraints. Our benchmark provides a principled basis for evaluating models under restricted data regimes and encourages the development of methods that are robust to distribution shift and aligned with responsible data use.

When a neural network estimates someone's age from a photograph, does it process biometric data? The answer depends on whether identity-discriminative representations arise within the network during inference, a question that may seem trivial to ML researchers but triggers consent requirements under GDPR, statutory damages under BIPA, or high-risk AI classification under the EU AI Act. Yet no regulatory guidance addresses it. This position paper provides empirical evidence: 14 models evaluated across 3 face verification benchmarks show age estimators fall orders of magnitude short of identification thresholds. Age estimation models cannot identify individuals. We call on researchers to provide transparency about what systems store and can do, and on regulators to distinguish transient processing from template storage.

Mobile deployment of facial age estimation requires models that balance predictive accuracy with low latency and compact size. In this work, we present MobileAgeNet, a lightweight age-regression framework that achieves an MAE of 4.65 years on the UTKFace held-out test set while maintaining efficient on-device inference with an average latency of 14.4 ms measured using the AI Benchmark application. The model is built on a pretrained MobileNetV3-Large backbone combined with a compact regression head, enabling real-time prediction on mobile devices. The training and evaluation pipeline is integrated into the NN LEMUR Dataset framework, supporting reproducible experimentation, structured hyperparameter optimization, and consistent evaluation. We employ bounded age regression together with a two-stage fine-tuning strategy to improve training stability and generalization. Experimental results show that MobileAgeNet achieves competitive accuracy with 3.23M parameters, and that the deployment pipeline from PyTorch training through ONNX export to TensorFlow Lite conversion - preserves predictive behavior without measurable degradation under practical on-device conditions. Overall, this work provides a practical, deployment-ready baseline for mobile-oriented facial age estimation.