Abstract
Researchers need to answer ad-hoc questions about the contents of domain-specific archives but often lack the expertise to write structured queries on the metadata. We show that when domain vocabulary and semantics are captured in a well-designed Web Ontology Language (OWL) ontology, Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate accurate structured queries zero-shot, without task-specific fine-tuning, retrieval augmentation, or multi-agent orchestration. We present the Natural Language Knowledge Graph Query (NLKGQ) system, a framework and development process that enables natural language access to metadata in such archives. The framework includes a web interface that helps researchers pose natural language questions, which a domain-agnostic harness translates to SPARQL via an LLM and executes against a knowledge graph. The development process begins with capturing domain vocabulary and semantics in a formal OWL ontology. Domain-specific code then extracts metadata from archive sources and imports it into a knowledge graph defined by the ontology. Both are designed for reuse across domains. We demonstrate the system on metadata derived from a large-scale neuroimaging research archive, evaluating multiple LLMs and ontology representations. The best configurations achieve 100% accuracy on a 21-question competency and regression test set developed with domain experts. An ablation study across eight ontology representations reveals that readable entity names and semantic annotations are the dominant factors in accuracy, more significant than model choice or prompt engineering. We also compare SPARQL to an auto-generated SQL database as query backends, showing that OWL's structural features provide a substantial advantage over SQL DDL for LLM-driven query generation. Our demonstration domain requires local LLMs on modest institutional hardware to address privacy concerns for human subject data.
Explore similar work
Sep 12, 2026cs.AI
We present EXYGEN (EXplore Your Graphs ENgine), a framework for knowledge graph (KG) understanding that enables conversational access to KGs at scale. We address two questions in sequence. First, how effectively can LLMs perform text-to-SPARQL generation given only automatically derived structured metadata and small graph samples, rather than task-specific fine-tuning? We integrate VoID descriptions and ShEx schemas into a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline and ablate KG-derived context on the SciQA benchmark. Our best configuration -- combining ShEx schemas, retrieved triples, and example question-query pairs -- reaches an exact match of 0.419 on execution results without any LLM fine-tuning. We further find that lexical metrics such as F1 poorly predict query correctness, and that larger general-purpose LLMs can outperform smaller code-specialized ones once given sufficient context. Second, we ask how to generate the structured metadata that this method relies on from very large KGs, where KG metadata generation becomes computationally intractable. We introduce a predicate-coverage-aware parallel graph sampling strategy that preserves structural diversity while remaining computationally tractable. On OpenCitations Meta and GESIS, it retains high predicate coverage with minimal triple loss and reduces runtime by over 80x; on ORKG, sampling is not just faster but the only tractable path to obtain complete metadata. Together, these results show that structured schema context and lightweight prompting can substantially reduce reliance on fine-tuning for scalable conversational access to KGs, though closing the remaining gap to fully fine-tuned approaches will likely require reducing dependence on curated question-query exemplars -- whether through synthetic generation or an execution-feedback-driven approach -- and validating these findings beyond a single benchmark.
Harshdeep Singh, Yurui Zhu, Giovanni Colavizza +1
Jul 7, 2026cs.IR
Dataset search depends heavily on metadata, making LLM-generated metadata a consequential form of synthetic content in retrieval systems. We study six metadata-generation settings for RDF datasets, ranging from simple rewriting to profile-grounded and agentic graph-based generation, and evaluate them jointly for retrieval effectiveness and faithfulness. Unconstrained metadata rewriting delivers the strongest retrieval gains over the original metadata, but it is also the least faithful, showing that search improvements can be driven by unsupported semantic expansion. More grounded settings substantially improve faithfulness, and profile-grounded rewriting provides the most balanced trade-off between retrieval effectiveness and grounding. These findings position synthetic metadata as a system-level IR problem in which effectiveness, provenance, and trust must be evaluated together.
Riccardo Terrenzi, Serkan Ayvaz
Apr 10, 2026cs.CL
Many disciplines pose natural-language research questions over large document collections whose answers typically require structured evidence, traditionally obtained by manually designing an annotation schema and exhaustively labeling the corpus, a slow and error-prone process. We introduce ScheMatiQ, which leverages calls to a backbone LLM to take a question and a corpus to produce a schema and a grounded database, with a web interface that lets steer and revise the extraction. In collaboration with domain experts, we show that ScheMatiQ yields outputs that support real-world analysis in law and computational biology. We release ScheMatiQ as open source with a public web interface, and invite experts across disciplines to use it with their own data. All resources, including the website, source code, and demonstration video, are available at: www.ScheMatiQ-ai.com
Shahar Levy, Eliya Habba, Reshef Mintz +3